Re: Issue 3001 in reviewboard: Session cookies are stored imporperly

2013-06-17 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3001 by mechaneka: Session cookies are stored imporperly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3001 Thank you for reply, I've got your point. The idea of too-long sessions is coming from the project security polices -- we have ldap-authorization in our

Re: Issue 3001 in reviewboard: Session cookies are stored imporperly

2013-06-14 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: ThirdParty Comment #3 on issue 3001 by chip...@gmail.com: Session cookies are stored imporperly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3001 All session management is handled by Django. Short of duplicating all their work and rewriting it, there's not

Re: Issue 3001 in reviewboard: Session cookies are stored imporperly

2013-06-13 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3001 by mechaneka: Session cookies are stored imporperly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3001 Yep. From my experience I can guess that session cookies never expires. I mean, we've got session opened long ago, we've reconfigured the virtual host, and

Issue 3001 in reviewboard: Session cookies are stored imporperly

2013-06-11 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3001 by mechan...@gmail.com: Session cookies are stored imporperly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3001 *** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *** If you have a patch,

Re: Issue 3001 in reviewboard: Session cookies are stored imporperly

2013-06-11 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 3001 by trowb...@gmail.com: Session cookies are stored imporperly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3001 I'm really not quite sure what you're reporting. Can you rephrase? -- You received this message because this