Re: Issue 3474 in reviewboard: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users

2014-07-31 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 3474 by chip...@gmail.com: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3474 Fixed on release-2.0.x (13d52e6). This will go into 2.0.6. -- You received this messa

Re: Issue 3474 in reviewboard: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users

2014-07-31 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: PendingReview Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: Milestone-Release2.0.x Comment #6 on issue 3474 by chip...@gmail.com: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3474 (No com

Re: Issue 3474 in reviewboard: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users

2014-07-11 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3474 by bgaid...@gmail.com: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3474 Just some more input. We actually are two or three people here having been confused by this. None of us thought of

Re: Issue 3474 in reviewboard: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users

2014-07-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3474 by trowb...@gmail.com: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3474 Issue 3454 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 3474 in reviewboard: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users

2014-07-10 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Summary: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users Comment #3 on issue 3474 by trowb...@gmail.com: Single-line inline editors without OK/Cancel are confusing for users http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3474 (No comment was entered fo