> On Oct. 18, 2016, 4:50 p.m., Sid Wagle wrote:
> > 1. Agree with SUmit on increasing timeout to 5 sicne we are killing the
> > thread.
> > 2. Instead of cryptic way of kill is there a graceful way to stop using
> > separate Stoppable Thread extension which can be called from the parent ?
>
>
> On Oct. 18, 2016, 4:50 p.m., Sid Wagle wrote:
> > 1. Agree with SUmit on increasing timeout to 5 sicne we are killing the
> > thread.
> > 2. Instead of cryptic way of kill is there a graceful way to stop using
> > separate Stoppable Thread extension which can be called from the parent ?
>
>
> On Oct. 18, 2016, 4:50 p.m., Sid Wagle wrote:
> > 1. Agree with SUmit on increasing timeout to 5 sicne we are killing the
> > thread.
> > 2. Instead of cryptic way of kill is there a graceful way to stop using
> > separate Stoppable Thread extension which can be called from the parent ?
1. S
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52989/#review153113
---
1. Agree with SUmit on increasing timeout to 5 sicne we are killin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52989/#review153097
---
ambari-agent/src/main/python/ambari_agent/ActionQueue.py (line 24
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52989/#review153095
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vitalyi Brodetskyi
On Жов. 18, 2016, 3:0
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52989/
---
Review request for Ambari and Dmitro Lisnichenko.
Bugs: AMBARI-18629
https:
