---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55105/#review166465
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David McLaughlin
On Jan. 28, 2017, 9:15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/#review166455
---
Ship it!
Master (98eb99a) is green with this patch.
./build-s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/#review166450
---
@ReviewBot retry
- Dmitriy Shirchenko
On Feb. 22, 2017, 10:35 p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56690/#review166430
---
This is only a very partial review. My brain was not capable of mo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/#review166435
---
Master (98eb99a) is red with this patch.
./build-support/jenkins
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/#review166434
---
@ReviewBot retry
- Dmitriy Shirchenko
On Feb. 22, 2017, 10:35 p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/
---
(Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 10:35 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Mehrdad Nurolahz
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/#review166432
---
This patch does not apply cleanly against RB#56690 (98eb99a), do y
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56691/
---
(Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 10:19 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Mehrdad Nurolahz
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55105/#review166427
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Stephan Erb
On Jan. 28, 2017, 10:15 p.m., M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56935/
---
(Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 11:34 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin
> On Feb. 22, 2017, 10:27 a.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> > Could you please add to the RB description on what methodology you used to
> > determine this and what are the results of this patch?
> >
> >
> > Further, do you have any ideas on how we can prevent regressions?
Short-term, we need to in
> On Feb. 22, 2017, 10:07 a.m., Reza Motamedi wrote:
> > Mehrdad, do you also have some stats on how much these changes reduced the
> > object creation rate?
The object allocation rate dropped from of 25 M/s on average to 15-20 M/s. But,
as I indicated above these numbers are not representativ
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56935/#review166387
---
Could you please add to the RB description on what methodology you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56935/#review166385
---
Mehrdad, do you also have some stats on how much these changes red
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56935/#review166380
---
Ship it!
Master (98eb99a) is green with this patch.
./build-s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56395/#review166376
---
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/Configura
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56935/
---
Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Zameer Manji.
Repository: auror
18 matches
Mail list logo
