Re: Review Request 33676: Always require slave checkpointing.

2015-04-29 Thread Bill Farner
> On April 29, 2015, 9:50 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > Actually I may have jumped the gun here - can you verify that mesos will > > behave sanely when we flip frameworkInfo.checkpoint from false to true (as > > everyone who has been using the defaults in 0.7.0 will encounter when they > > at

Re: Review Request 33676: Always require slave checkpointing.

2015-04-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33676/#review82040 --- Actually I may have jumped the gun here - can you verify that mesos

Re: Review Request 33676: Always require slave checkpointing.

2015-04-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33676/#review82038 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Sweeney On April 29, 2015, 8:04 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 33676: Always require slave checkpointing.

2015-04-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33676/#review81994 --- The upstream ticket referenced was fixed in 0.22.0 - should we wait

Re: Review Request 33676: Always require slave checkpointing.

2015-04-29 Thread Aurora ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33676/#review81967 --- Master (e311dbe) is green with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins

Review Request 33676: Always require slave checkpointing.

2015-04-29 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33676/ --- Review request for Aurora and Kevin Sweeney. Bugs: AURORA-716 https://issue