> On June 23, 2015, 2:12 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> > Would this RR be still relevant after https://reviews.apache.org/r/35766/?
No, this would be superseded by 35766 and actually fixing the problem that I
was doc'ing the workaround for :)
Thanks!
- Roger
--
> On June 23, 2015, 5:39 a.m., Marco Massenzio wrote:
> > Can you please add one of the committers as a reviewer?
>
> Till Toenshoff wrote:
> Did we document such requirement somewhere?
er... I was being economical with words here: I don't know if Roger is a
committer himself, because if h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35763/#review88974
---
Would this RR be still relevant after https://reviews.apache.org/r/
> On June 23, 2015, 5:39 a.m., Marco Massenzio wrote:
> > Can you please add one of the committers as a reviewer?
Did we document such requirement somewhere?
- Till
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https:/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35763/#review88925
---
Can you please add one of the committers as a reviewer?
- Marco Mas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35763/#review88924
---
Ship it!
Thanks for this.
A couple of minor formatting nits.
doc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35763/#review88915
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [35763]
All tests passed.
- M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35763/
---
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-1856
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
