Re: Review Request 36810: Don't check protobuf jar in libprocess.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36810/#review94175 --- Ship it! Seems reasonable to me. I haven't run a build personally

Re: Review Request 36810: Don't check protobuf jar in libprocess.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36810/#review93565 --- Ship it! LGTM. Any build experts want to take a look? @tstclair,

Re: Review Request 36810: Don't check protobuf jar in libprocess.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36810/#review93317 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [36810] All tests passed. -

Re: Review Request 36810: Don't check protobuf jar in libprocess.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36810/#review93239 --- Did you test this with java enabled as well? What about without

Review Request 36810: Don't check protobuf jar in libprocess.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36810/ --- Review request for mesos and Niklas Nielsen. Bugs: MESOS-2480

Re: Review Request 36810: Don't check protobuf jar in libprocess.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36810/ --- (Updated July 25, 2015, 8:21 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Niklas