Re: Review Request 38625: Keep clone syscall consistent.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38625/ --- (Updated Sept. 22, 2015, 6:37 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Joris

Re: Review Request 38625: Keep clone syscall consistent.

> On Sept. 22, 2015, 4:51 p.m., Cong Wang wrote: > > Why not introduce a wrapper for clone() to hide the 'stack'? Sure, let me update again. - haosdent --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: Review Request 38625: Keep clone syscall consistent.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38625/#review100012 --- Why not introduce a wrapper for clone() to hide the 'stack'? -

Re: Review Request 38625: Keep clone syscall consistent.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38625/#review1 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [38625] All tests passed. -

Review Request 38625: Keep clone syscall consistent.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38625/ --- Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Joris Van Remoortere, Kapil Arya, Michael