> On Oct. 12, 2017, 4:21 p.m., Gaston Kleiman wrote:
> > This is great, thanks!
Ah, I missed your comments. Let me submit a separate patch to address them!
- Gilbert
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/#review187894
---
FAIL: Failed to apply the current review.
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/#review187891
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
This is great, thanks!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/
---
(Updated Oct. 12, 2017, 4:14 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/#review183786
---
docs/mesos-containerizer.md
Lines 67 (patched)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/#review183265
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
docs/mesos-containerizer.md
Lines 79
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/#review183014
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
docs/mesos-containerizer.md
Lines 79
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/#review183011
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [61675]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61675/
---
Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, Gastón Kleiman, Greg Mann, Jie Yu,
