Re: Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

> On Nov. 14, 2017, 9:07 a.m., Akash Gupta wrote: > > src/tests/containerizer/cpu_isolator_tests.cpp > > Line 251 (original), 270 (patched) > > > > > > Personally, I think it makes sense to increase this time on

Re: Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

> On Nov. 14, 2017, 9:07 a.m., Akash Gupta wrote: > > src/tests/containerizer/cpu_isolator_tests.cpp > > Line 251 (original), 270 (patched) > > > > > > Personally, I think it makes sense to increase this time on

Re: Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63277/#review190964 --- src/tests/containerizer/cpu_isolator_tests.cpp Line 251

Re: Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63277/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2017, 3:19 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Aaron Wood, Akash

Re: Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

> On Oct. 26, 2017, 2:59 p.m., Jeff Coffler wrote: > > src/tests/containerizer/cpu_isolator_tests.cpp > > Lines 120 (patched) > > > > > > Given what we learned about quoting, why not just do: > > > >

Re: Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63277/#review189358 --- src/tests/containerizer/cpu_isolator_tests.cpp Lines 120

Review Request 63277: Windows: Ported CPU and memory isolator tests.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63277/ --- Review request for mesos, Akash Gupta, Jeff Coffler, Jie Yu, John Kordich,