Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11520055
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/WebUI.scala ---
@@ -17,53 +17,134 @@
package org.apache.spark.ui
-import
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40173436
This is a really nice re-factoring! Unfortunately I just had time to look
at some of it due to running into a weird performance issue. For some reason
the pages were
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40173668
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40173673
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/341#issuecomment-40174483
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40174456
@tdas there are some binary compatiblity checks here that need to be fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/341#issuecomment-40174484
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14049/
---
If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11520596
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/WebUI.scala ---
@@ -17,53 +17,134 @@
package org.apache.spark.ui
-import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40174782
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40174791
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40174857
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14051/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40174856
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user CrazyJvm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/389
update spark.default.parallelism
actually, the value 8 is only valid in mesos fine-grained mode :
code
override def defaultParallelism() =
sc.conf.getInt(spark.default.parallelism, 8)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/389#issuecomment-40175755
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40177717
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40177723
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40177788
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14052/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#issuecomment-40177786
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40177915
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40177916
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14050/
---
If your project
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/344#issuecomment-40178755
Merging this into master.
@tgravescs, @pwendell if this is relevant to 1.0, please do merge into that
branch too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/344
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user baishuo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/390
Update WindowedDStream.scala
update the content of Exception when windowDuration is not multiple of
parent.slideDuration
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391
SPARK-1426: Make MLlib work with NumPy versions older than 1.7
Currently it requires NumPy 1.7 due to using the copyto method
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40190567
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user abhishekkr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/392
pyspark need Py2 to work, graceful and helping fail if system default is Py3
it failed on mine thus noticed
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/392#issuecomment-40193401
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#discussion_r11528081
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/LBFGS.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#discussion_r11528087
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/LBFGSSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/353#discussion_r11528239
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/LBFGSSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40196304
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40196347
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40196355
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40198985
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14053/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40198984
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/339#issuecomment-40199289
Hi, @kayousterhout , mind reviewing this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/391#issuecomment-40206521
@techaddict Is it the only place that requires numpy 1.7? If so, please
also remove the check in
`/Users/meng/src/spark-mengxr/python/pyspark/mllib/__init__.py` and run
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/362#discussion_r11536291
--- Diff:
yarn/stable/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala
---
@@ -347,8 +347,8 @@ class ApplicationMaster(args:
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/362#discussion_r11536569
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -627,6 +627,13 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Number of
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/344#issuecomment-40216406
I pulled this into branch-1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332#issuecomment-40221509
How to let Jenkins to run the test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/303#discussion_r11539966
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -424,29 +408,110 @@ object ClientBase {
}
}
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/379#issuecomment-40224441
@andrewor14
I don't speak english well. On weekends, I will write a document.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/339#issuecomment-40224832
sure, take your time
I notified you just because you're the original reporter of the issue and I
want to ensure I understand the issue correctly
---
If your
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40227452
@marmbrus I think we'd better remove either
`HiveInMemoryCompatabilitySuite` or `HiveCompatabilitySuite`. Travis complains
that the build time is too long ( 50 min). I
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40229263
Okay, that's a good point. Why don't you just move the before and after
functions that turn on caching into hive compatibility and remove the in
memory sub class.
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/266#issuecomment-40232250
Ah looks like this is not merging cleanly. Any chance you could bring it up
to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/266#issuecomment-40232019
Okay this looks good, thanks @srowen!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/390#issuecomment-40232810
good catch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/390#issuecomment-40232681
Jenkins test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/390#issuecomment-40233622
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/390#issuecomment-40233557
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11543991
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11544206
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/375#issuecomment-40238010
Ok, maybe it's not a bug per se. But I think it somewhat breaks the user's
expectations.
Let's say that given a user's configuration, the default fs is hdfs; I'd
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40238090
OK, merged these two giant suites, hope both Travis and Jenkins are happy
with this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40238344
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40238325
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11545457
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40238429
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11545501
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingJobProgressListener.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40238430
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14055/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/390#issuecomment-40238669
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14054/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/360#issuecomment-40238811
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11545788
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingJobProgressListener.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40239515
@ahirreddy could you make a spark JIRA for this? Seems like a large enough
feature that we'd want to track it. Add the component as SQL.
---
If your project is set up
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11546093
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -67,19 +154,23 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils {
type=text/css /
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11546163
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11546175
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/382
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40241016
Hmm, this failure seems to be related to the new Python Spark SQL API
(which isn't even part of this PR). I will investigate.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11546692
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11546746
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingJobProgressListener.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40241301
There already is a JIRA :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1374
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#discussion_r11546882
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingJobProgressListener.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/363#issuecomment-40241427
Also, I think this PR is breaking jenkins by leaving files around that are
making RAT fail. I don't think its the fault of this PR, but a problem with
the RAT code.
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/354#issuecomment-40241700
@rxin @mateiz PTAL
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/346#issuecomment-40241825
@haosdent Mind closing this PR if we aren't going to merge it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/354#discussion_r11547314
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SchemaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -62,4 +65,43 @@ trait SchemaRDDLike {
def registerAsTable(tableName:
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/364#issuecomment-40242267
Thanks Xiangrui! Merged into both master and branch-1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40242411
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40242398
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40242484
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40242487
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14057/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/360#issuecomment-40242736
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14056/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/360#issuecomment-40242735
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40242857
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40242872
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40243023
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40243025
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14058/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40243853
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40243869
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/290#issuecomment-40247442
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14059/
---
If your project
GitHub user pwendell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/393
HOTFIX: Ignore python metastore files in RAT checks.
This was causing some errors with pull request tests.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/374#issuecomment-40248604
@marmbrus thanks for catching this I've submitted #393 to fix it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/394
Yarn: do not set local IP in remote process environment.
Without this, remote processes won't launch when you set SPARK_LOCAL_IP for
your driver.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/375#issuecomment-40248807
Commit that implements what I'm suggesting, if you're interested:
https://github.com/vanzin/spark/commit/15c4d1e7961d2ea4f89f889f2caa5211bbe7d0de
I haven't
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/394#issuecomment-40248929
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/393#issuecomment-40248931
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/393#issuecomment-40248944
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
