Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/438#issuecomment-41009317
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/450#issuecomment-41009229
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/450#issuecomment-41009230
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14319/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/467#issuecomment-41008424
I merged this. @andrewor14 this PR is actually into branch 0.9 so it's not
possible to remove the commnet.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41008412
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41008416
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41008347
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#issuecomment-41008236
`(math.random * 1000).toInt` can only produce 1000 values, which is very
few. You should use a much bigger number than 1000, e.g. `1e12`, and then do
`toLong`. Or you can c
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11840079
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rddsampler.py ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
import random
class RDDSampler(object):
-def __init__(self, withReplacement,
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11840059
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rddsampler.py ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
import random
class RDDSampler(object):
-def __init__(self, withReplacement,
Github user advancedxy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11840021
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rddsampler.py ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
import random
class RDDSampler(object):
-def __init__(self, withReplacem
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/473#issuecomment-41007764
Jenkins, test this please. Thanks for the clean-up! Looks good to me,
pending tests...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user smartnut007 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11839813
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -465,7 +465,13 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user smartnut007 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11839800
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rddsampler.py ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
import random
class RDDSampler(object):
-def __init__(self, withReplace
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/478#issuecomment-41007441
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
GitHub user prabinb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/478
[SPARK-1550] Fixed - Successive creation of spark context fails in pyspark,
if the previous initialization of spark context had failed.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runn
Github user advancedxy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#issuecomment-41007103
```seed: Int = (math.random * 1000).toInt)```
hi, @mateiz should we use Long instead of Int to avoid collision.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/450#issuecomment-41007019
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11839631
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rddsampler.py ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
import random
class RDDSampler(object):
-def __init__(self, withReplacement,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/450#issuecomment-41007015
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#discussion_r11839619
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -465,7 +465,13 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#issuecomment-41006940
Hey, FYI, it's not a good idea to use System.nanoTime as the seed because
multiple RDDs created at the same time (which can easily happen due to lazy
evaluation) would have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/375#issuecomment-41006943
Thanks, I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#issuecomment-41006955
Same thing applies in Python, don't use the current time, call their random
function.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/465#issuecomment-41006929
@srowen
I'm sorry, I submitted a modified on the
sql/catalyst/pom.xml,sql/hive/pom.xml,sql/core/pom.xml (Four spaces formatted
into two spaces).
---
If your project
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/450#issuecomment-41006843
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/476#issuecomment-41006728
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14318/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/476#issuecomment-41006725
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41006583
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14317/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41006582
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/467#issuecomment-41005988
(you could also remove it in this PR)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user smartnut007 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#issuecomment-41005731
@advancedxy If consistency is important then I could set default of
long(time.time() * 1e9) in RDDSampler (python api) constructor like you
suggested.
---
If your p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user smartnut007 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/462
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user smartnut007 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/462#issuecomment-41005398
new PR against master instead of 1.0
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/470
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477#issuecomment-41005327
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
GitHub user smartnut007 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/477
SPARK-1438 RDD.sample() make seed param optional
copying form previous pull request https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/462
Its probably better to let the underlying language implementat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/476#issuecomment-41005124
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/476#issuecomment-41005119
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user yinxusen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/476
JIRA issue: [SPARK-1405](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1405)
Gibbs sampling based Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for MLlib
(This PR is based on a joint work done with @liancheng fou
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/470#issuecomment-41004962
Thanks I'm merging this - there is an issue with the binary checker for
sql... we'll need to fix it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#discussion_r11838597
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +236,21 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Retu
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#discussion_r11838553
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +236,21 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Retu
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/457#issuecomment-41003865
Okay I tested this locally and I'm going to merge it. One thing I noticed
is that in catalyst/hive a ton of things are exposed that we might want to
either make package-p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41003059
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41003054
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41003027
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-41002706
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-41002708
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14314/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41002705
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41002707
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14315/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-41002344
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14316/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-41002343
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-41002278
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-41002274
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user coderxiang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-41002133
@yinxusen Just sent the data/code to you. For the running time, from the
web UI, it appears to be just (nIter * average reduce/aggregate), . The
aggregate time for SGD
GitHub user manishamde opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475
SPARK-1544 Add support for deep decision trees.
etrain and I came with a PR for arbitrarily deep decision trees at the cost
of multiple passes over the data at deep tree levels.
To summa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41001038
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14313/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-41001037
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41000213
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474#issuecomment-41000208
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-41000185
Cool, could you share your data-generator code to me, and let me take care
of the `Nan` problem? Besides, could you provide the total running time of SGD
and ADMM when th
GitHub user CodingCat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/474
[HOTFIX] SPARK-1399: move outdated comments
as the original PR was merged before this mistake is foundfix here,
Sorry about that @pwendell, @andrewor14, I will be more careful next tim
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/467#issuecomment-40999877
@andrewor14 , ah, sorry about that, I will submit a "hotfix",
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-40999182
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-40999175
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user coderxiang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-40997859
@etrain that's a good point if ADMM implementations of other algorithms are
going to be added in MLlib. Fortunately, for lasso, ridge regression and sparse
logistic reg
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/459#issuecomment-40997571
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/459#issuecomment-40997572
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14312/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user coderxiang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-40997301
@mengxr @yinxusen Here are some comparison results between ADMM and SGD.
These results are just for these particular parameter settings and data sets
and no over-gene
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-40996991
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-40996982
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-40996994
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/300#issuecomment-40996870
Thanks - I've merged this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user advancedxy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/462#discussion_r11835682
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -466,6 +466,12 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-40996418
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-40996419
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14311/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/473#issuecomment-40994587
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-40994380
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/469#issuecomment-40994383
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14310/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
GitHub user izendejas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/473
Minor optimizations. Use safer take, tail methods.
Per an email thread I initiated and after feedback and clearing my ICLA,
I'm requesting some minor changes be pulled to use the more readable and
Github user etrain commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-40994263
Hey, this looks awesome! One high-level issue I see is that the ADMM
optimizer has embedded in it knowledge of the loss function it's trying to
minimize. ADMM is much more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/470#issuecomment-40993649
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/470#issuecomment-40993650
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14309/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/459#issuecomment-40993061
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/459#issuecomment-40993057
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/459#issuecomment-40992985
sorry, my bad. Updated "java.lang.BigDecimal" => "java.math.BigDecimal"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-40992799
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/446#issuecomment-40992792
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user coderxiang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-40992367
@yinxusen Thanks for the comments. I'm running some comparison between SGD
and ADMM right now and will try to post them later. It would also be great if
you could prov
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#issuecomment-40991905
@coderxiang It is better to have a detailed test, just like what @mengxr
said. I can do a favor on testing if you need.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/186#discussion_r11833395
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -678,7 +530,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
* We run the operation in a s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/472#issuecomment-40991777
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#discussion_r11833298
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/LassoSuite.scala ---
@@ -44,8 +44,11 @@ class LassoSuite extends FunSuite with LocalSparkCont
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#discussion_r11833315
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/LassoSuite.scala ---
@@ -113,9 +116,100 @@ class LassoSuite extends FunSuite with
LocalSpark
GitHub user chu11 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/472
SPARK-693
If SPARK_CONF_DIR environment variable is specified, use spark-env.sh
specified in $SPARK_CONF_DIR when starting daemons.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#discussion_r11833279
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/Lasso.scala ---
@@ -189,3 +230,70 @@ object LassoWithSGD {
sc.stop()
}
}
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/458#discussion_r11833249
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/Lasso.scala ---
@@ -189,3 +230,70 @@ object LassoWithSGD {
sc.stop()
}
}
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
