Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024698
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024688
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#issuecomment-51678949
QA tests have started for PR 1866. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18246/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user dorx opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866
[SPARK-2937] Separate out samplyByKeyExact as its own API in PairRDDFunction
To enable Python consistency and `Experimental` label of the
`sampleByKeyExact` API.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1859#issuecomment-51678860
QA results for PR 1859:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1724#issuecomment-51678636
QA tests have started for PR 1724. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18245/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1786#issuecomment-51678638
QA tests have started for PR 1786. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18244/consoleFull
---
If
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1724#issuecomment-51678528
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1786#issuecomment-51678537
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#issuecomment-51678535
QA results for PR 1865:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1525
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1859#issuecomment-51678150
QA tests have started for PR 1859. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18243/consoleFull
---
If
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1525#issuecomment-51678146
Okay cool LGTM too... after some thought I'm okay to leave it in. The name
right now is a bit awkward, but I don't see a better option at this point.
Thanks @kayousterho
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1704#issuecomment-51678131
@ScrapCodes look good to you? I'd like to pull this in soon to the 1.1
branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51678112
QA results for PR 1862:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1859#issuecomment-51678093
Jenkins, test this please. LGTM... pedantry is encouraged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#issuecomment-51677761
QA tests have started for PR 1865. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18242/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865
[SPARK-2936] Migrate Netty network module from Java to Scala
The Netty network module was originally written when Scala 2.9.x had a bug
that prevents a pure Scala implementation, and a subset of the fi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51677448
QA tests have started for PR 1862. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18241/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51677423
QA results for PR 1862:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16024319
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,52 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51676717
QA tests have started for PR 1862. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18240/consoleFull
---
If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1858
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1858#issuecomment-51676330
Thanks. Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1838
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1838#issuecomment-51676244
Thanks. I'm merging this in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16024057
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,57 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024028
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024037
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024031
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024040
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024043
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024030
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024033
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#discussion_r16024027
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/ChiSquaredTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1838#issuecomment-51675161
Could someone merge this? Thanks. @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1845#issuecomment-51674448
QA tests have started for PR 1845. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18239/consoleFull
---
If
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1513#issuecomment-51674336
@pwendell , can you verify this pr? thanks~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51674337
QA results for PR 1862:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1852#issuecomment-51674266
@marmbrus SparkSQLEnv.stop will clean up and shut down the Spark SQL
environments. and it also call sparkContext.stop() method.But maybe more
clean up funcs will in S
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1864#issuecomment-51674246
QA results for PR 1864:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):$FWDIR/bin/spark-submit --c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51674177
QA results for PR 1862:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1820#issuecomment-51673741
QA results for PR 1820:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1863#discussion_r16023500
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala ---
@@ -201,8 +201,9 @@ object ParquetFilters {
(leftFilter,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51673109
QA tests have started for PR 1862. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18238/consoleFull
---
If
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1825#issuecomment-51673034
Thanks for pointing this out @andrewor14, opened #1864 to fix both
`pyspark` and `spark-shell` and added related code to handle the gateway.
@JoshRosen @freeman
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1863#issuecomment-51673008
QA results for PR 1863:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1864#issuecomment-51672988
QA tests have started for PR 1864. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18237/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51672993
QA results for PR 1862:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51672880
QA tests have started for PR 1862. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18236/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1864
[SPARK-2894][Core] Fixes spark-shell and pyspark CLI options
This PR tries to fix SPARK-2894 in a way different from #1825, namely
filtering out all `spark-submit` options from user application op
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023299
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1820#issuecomment-51672440
QA tests have started for PR 1820. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18235/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1858#issuecomment-51672381
QA results for PR 1858:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1820#issuecomment-51672370
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023088
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023077
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023075
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023042
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,22 +76,34 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite exten
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023020
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16023015
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16022998
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16022979
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51671390
QA tests have started for PR 1862. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18234/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51671204
QA results for PR 1862:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1858#issuecomment-51670360
QA tests have started for PR 1858. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18233/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1863#issuecomment-51670364
QA tests have started for PR 1863. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18232/consoleFull
---
If
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1858#issuecomment-51670209
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16022431
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,98 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1863
[WIP][SPARK-2935][SQL]Fix parquet predicate push down bug
TODO:
- [ ] Test case
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/sp
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1836
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1836#issuecomment-51670108
Thanks. Merging this in master and branch-1.1 and branch-1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#discussion_r16022367
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -188,3 +188,98 @@ object LogisticRegressionWithSGD {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51668966
QA tests have started for PR 1862. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18231/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862
[SPARK-2934][MLlib] Adding LogisticRegressionWithLBFGS Interface
for training with LBFGS Optimizer which will converge faster than SGD.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runnin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1849#issuecomment-51668154
QA results for PR 1849:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user freeman-lab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1825#issuecomment-51667756
@JoshRosen @liancheng regarding the iPython options, these are three
setting combos we use frequently (and likely anyone else using notebooks):
``notebook``, ``notebo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1861#issuecomment-51665565
QA results for PR 1861:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1849#issuecomment-51664938
QA tests have started for PR 1849. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18230/consoleFull
---
If
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1857#issuecomment-51664390
Tested linear algebra operations we used in MLlib and everything looks fine
(https://github.com/mengxr/linalg-test) and axpy is faster than 0.7. I'm
merging this into both
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1861#issuecomment-51664302
QA results for PR 1861:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1857
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1749
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#issuecomment-51662596
QA results for PR 1733:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1836#issuecomment-51662493
QA results for PR 1836:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1861#issuecomment-51661731
QA tests have started for PR 1861. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18229/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1849#issuecomment-51661232
QA results for PR 1849:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1819#issuecomment-51660339
QA results for PR 1819:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):case class OutputFaker(outp
Github user chutium commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1861#issuecomment-51660191
maybe ```spark-shell.cmd``` should also be changed?
```cmd /V /E /C %SPARK_HOME%\bin\spark-submit.cmd spark-shell --class
org.apache.spark.repl.Main %*```
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1836#issuecomment-51660220
QA results for PR 1836:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1857#issuecomment-51659952
QA results for PR 1857:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1861#issuecomment-51659955
QA tests have started for PR 1861. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18228/consoleFull
---
If
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1252#discussion_r16016911
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StageTable.scala ---
@@ -88,17 +87,19 @@ private[ui] class StageTableBase(
private def makeDescrip
GitHub user chutium opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1861
[SPARK-2678] Follow-up commit for #1715 #1801, spark-shell is broken
all options are not working...
just run spark-shell with any options, such as --master
```./bin/spark-shell --master local
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1252#discussion_r16016992
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/WebUI.scala ---
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ private[spark] abstract class WebUI(
protected val publicHostName =
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1252#discussion_r16016823
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +102,13 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI(
private[spark] def appUIAddress =
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1724#issuecomment-51657911
test this please...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1733#issuecomment-51657309
QA tests have started for PR 1733. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18226/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1836#issuecomment-51657306
QA tests have started for PR 1836. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18225/consoleFull
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1860#issuecomment-51657125
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
