Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1872#issuecomment-51707226
I'm going to merge this one since the test failure is independent of this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1872
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1867
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1873
[SPARK-2953] Allow using short names for io compression codecs
Instead of requiring org.apache.spark.io.LZ4CompressionCodec, it is
easier for users if Spark just accepts lz4, lzf, snappy.
You can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1873#issuecomment-51707622
QA tests have started for PR 1873. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18273/consoleFull
---
Github user scwf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1385
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51708105
QA results for PR 1871:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1873#issuecomment-51708328
QA results for PR 1873:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1874
[PySpark] [SPARK-2954] [SPARK-2948] [SPARK-2910] [SPARK-2101] Python 2.6
Fixes
- Modify dev/run-tests to test with Python 2.6
- Use unittest2 when running on Python 2.6.
- Fix issue with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1874#issuecomment-51708413
QA tests have started for PR 1874. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18274/consoleFull
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1874#issuecomment-51708455
Jenkins, test this please.
I installed `unittest2` on Jenkins, so hopefully these tests should now
pass with `python2.6`.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1874#issuecomment-51708493
QA tests have started for PR 1874. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18275/consoleFull
---
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1870#issuecomment-51708496
Yeah that and the `DriverSuite`. Not sure what the reason is yet, but I
noticed that it started happening after #1777 went in...
---
If your project is set up for
GitHub user roji opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1875
Support executing Spark from symlinks
The current scripts (e.g. pyspark) fail to run when they are executed via
symlinks. A common Linux scenario would be to have Spark installed somewhere
(e.g.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1875#issuecomment-51708965
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1632#issuecomment-51709077
In #1758 @JoshRosen fixed ConnectionManager to handle the case remote
executor return error message.
But, the case remote executor hangs up is not handled so if
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1874#issuecomment-51709195
QA results for PR 1874:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1876
Remove extra semicolon in Task.scala
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark remove_semicolon_in_Task_scala
Alternatively
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1876#issuecomment-51710376
QA tests have started for PR 1876. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18276/consoleFull
---
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1869#issuecomment-51710728
Looks great!! +1 on this being useful.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1872#issuecomment-51710872
If case class then does it still need to be Externalizable ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1876#issuecomment-51711239
QA results for PR 1876:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1853#discussion_r16030631
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
val SHUFFLE_PARTITIONS =
Github user mubarak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1723#issuecomment-51712229
@tdas
I have removed 'name' from DStream and addressed your review comments. Can
you please review? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51712712
QA tests have started for PR 1871. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18277/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51712724
QA results for PR 1871:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1853#issuecomment-51712859
QA tests have started for PR 1853. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18278/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51713377
QA tests have started for PR 1871. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18279/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1856#issuecomment-51714336
QA tests have started for PR 1856. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18280/consoleFull
---
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1856#issuecomment-51714349
The reason of the timeout occurred in build failure is unknown due to
lacking of necessary logs (maybe something's wrong in the test suites, or maybe
it's just running
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51714618
QA results for PR 1871:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1856#issuecomment-51715928
QA results for PR 1856:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass CliSuite
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1877
[WIP][SPARK-2947] DAGScheduler resubmit the stage into an infinite loop
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark SPARK-2947
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1877#issuecomment-51717429
QA tests have started for PR 1877. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18281/consoleFull
---
Github user critikaled commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1372#issuecomment-51718206
hey this change has not been included in 1.0.2 release. any heads up on the
version in which this will be reflected ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user roji commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1465#issuecomment-51718343
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1877#issuecomment-51718834
QA results for PR 1877:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1465#issuecomment-51719921
I think there's already a mechanism to set this by using `local[N,
maxFailures]` to create your SparkContext:
```scala
// Regular expression for local[N,
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#discussion_r16032164
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaPairRDD.scala
---
@@ -133,68 +133,64 @@ class JavaPairRDD[K, V](val rdd: RDD[(K, V)])
*
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#discussion_r16032165
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaPairRDD.scala
---
@@ -133,68 +133,64 @@ class JavaPairRDD[K, V](val rdd: RDD[(K, V)])
*
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#discussion_r16032166
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -197,33 +197,57 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
*
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#discussion_r16032170
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -556,6 +519,97 @@ class PairRDDFunctionsSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#discussion_r16032172
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -556,6 +519,97 @@ class PairRDDFunctionsSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user erikerlandson commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1839#issuecomment-51720727
Jenkins still not getting the memo. How strict is Jenkins with commands?
Is 'okay' same as 'ok'?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#issuecomment-51720797
LGTM except inline comments. Thanks for keeping APIs consistent across
languages!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1862#issuecomment-51720829
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51720842
@Ishiihara Did you compare the speed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1849#issuecomment-51722636
@mengxr By the way, I actually realized that copying sparse to dense
vectors would be useful for me (in an example I wrote for the stats API check).
I wanted it for
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878
[SPARK-2850] [mllib] MLlib stats examples + small fixes
Added examples for statistical summarization:
* Scala: StatisticalSummary.scala
** Tests: correlation, MultivariateOnlineSummarizer
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-51723114
Q: Is the Python SparseVector.toDense() function too big an API update?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-51723167
QA tests have started for PR 1878. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18283/consoleFull
---
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1872#issuecomment-51724118
It is using some custom serialization to reduce serialization overhead.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1876#issuecomment-51724140
Thanks. I've merged this in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user Ishiihara commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51724432
@mengxr Some benchmark result
Environment: OSX 10.9, 8G memory, 2.5G i5 CPU, 4 threads
startingAlpha = 0.0025
vecterSize = 100
Driver memory 2g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1869
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1842#issuecomment-51725452
I've merged this into `master` and `branch-1.1`. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1842
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1879
SPARK-2955 [BUILD] Test code fails to compile with mvn compile without
install
(This is the corrected follow-up to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2903)
Right now, `mvn compile
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1879#issuecomment-51725678
QA tests have started for PR 1879. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18284/consoleFull
---
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033181
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileServerHandler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033193
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033197
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033207
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileClient.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033208
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileClient.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#issuecomment-51726479
Just had a couple minor issues with the translation, LGTM
functionality-wise. Did not do a thorough diff check, though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033275
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileClient.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r16033305
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileClient.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1865#discussion_r1601
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/FileClient.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1880
[SPARK-2650] Build column buffers in smaller batches
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark columnBatches
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1879#issuecomment-51727806
QA results for PR 1879:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1880#issuecomment-51727834
QA tests have started for PR 1880. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18285/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1880#issuecomment-51727923
QA results for PR 1880:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1799#discussion_r16033699
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkEnv.scala ---
@@ -246,8 +250,13 @@ object SparkEnv extends Logging {
.
}
-
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1372#issuecomment-51728995
It will be in 1.1. I guess we can also backport it to branch-1.0 -- how bad
is the issue, does it cause some problems or is it just annoying?
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1852#issuecomment-51729257
QA tests have started for PR 1852. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18287/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1880#issuecomment-5173
QA results for PR 1880:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1880#issuecomment-51730127
QA tests have started for PR 1880. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18288/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#issuecomment-51730126
QA tests have started for PR 1866. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18289/consoleFull
---
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1877#issuecomment-51730277
@witgo can you explain how this happens and why the fix works, and add a
unit test for it? We can't really merge something like this without a test.
---
If your project
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1875#issuecomment-51730319
@roji mind opening a JIRA issue for this on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK and adding it in the pull request's
title?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1873#discussion_r16034012
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -373,12 +373,12 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
/tr
tr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1875#issuecomment-51730388
QA tests have started for PR 1875. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18290/consoleFull
---
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1874#discussion_r16034056
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -905,8 +911,9 @@ def createFileInZip(self, name, content):
pattern = re.compile(r'^ *\|', re.MULTILINE)
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#issuecomment-51730672
Looks good, I also prefer separating this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51730712
Just FYI, mutable.HashMap can be pretty inefficient in space usage,
compared e.g. to java.util.HashMap or to Spark's AppendOnlyMap. In this case it
will depend on how
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871#issuecomment-51730738
Even better might be Spark's PrimitiveKeyOpenHashMap here. Again, if there
are lots of keys.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1813#discussion_r16034129
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/com/google/common/base/Optional.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 The Guava Authors
--- End diff
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1759#issuecomment-51730914
@marmbrus how do you intend this to work with things like Hive or JDBC? We
won't know the types at compile time there, but we might still want a solution
that checks the
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1791#issuecomment-51731037
BTW leaving TODOs in the Python code would also be okay, if you want to see
this in the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1791#issuecomment-51731023
I also actually prefer leaving out the non-implemented ones instead of
putting them in with NotImplementedError. Especially when working in an IDE or
something similar,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1813#discussion_r16034200
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/com/google/common/base/Optional.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 The Guava Authors
--- End diff
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#issuecomment-51731068
Merged into both master and branch-1.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1852#issuecomment-51731096
QA results for PR 1852:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1866#issuecomment-51731332
QA results for PR 1866:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-51731530
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-51731591
QA tests have started for PR 1878. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18291/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1875#issuecomment-51731609
QA results for PR 1875:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1880#issuecomment-51731948
QA results for PR 1880:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user GrahamDennis commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1827#issuecomment-51732795
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
