GitHub user ravipesala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2456
[SPARK-3536][SQL] SELECT on empty parquet table throws exception
It return null metadata from parquet if querying on empty parquet file
while calculating splits.So added null check and returns
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903#issuecomment-56140430
Thanks! Merged into master and branch-1.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1903
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user nishkamravi2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1391#issuecomment-56142506
@sryza Thanks Sandy. Will do.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#issuecomment-56144570
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#issuecomment-56144582
this is ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2378#issuecomment-56147622
@davies Does `PickleSerializer` compress data? If not, maybe we should
cache the deserialized RDD instead of the one from `_.reserialize`. They have
the same storage. I
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2446#issuecomment-56151121
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user gvramana opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2457
[SPARK-3268][SQL] DoubleType, FloatType and DecimalType modulus support
Supported modulus operation using % operator on fractional datatypes
FloatType, DoubleType and DecimalType
Example:
Hm deleteOnExit should at least not hurt and I thought it will delete dirs
if they are empty, which may be so if temp files inside never existed or
were cleaned up themselves. But yeah always delete explicitly in the normal
execution path even in the event of normal exceptions.
On Sep 19, 2014
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2453#issuecomment-56152819
Sorry for asking - but have you tested this on a real cluster?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2453#issuecomment-56152843
Oh and thanks for doing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2439#issuecomment-56153581
@jegonzal you should take a look :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ravipesala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2456#issuecomment-56157072
Please review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2458
[SPARK-3598][SQL]cast to timestamp should be the same as hive
this patch fixes timestamp smaller than 0 and cast int as timestamp
select cast(1000 as timestamp) from src limit 1;
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/791#issuecomment-56164031
Hi @liyezhang556520 , thanks for pointing this out! I have updated my PR,
please review @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/791#discussion_r17781184
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -239,18 +250,18 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(blockManager:
Github user mattf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#issuecomment-56172067
+1 lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mattf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17782052
--- Diff: sbin/slaves.sh ---
@@ -67,20 +69,26 @@ fi
if [ $HOSTLIST = ]; then
if [ $SPARK_SLAVES = ]; then
-export
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1391#issuecomment-56174217
@mridulm any comments?
I'm ok with it if its a consistent problem for users. One thing we
definitely need to do is document it and possibly look at including
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17785127
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -37,154 +36,106 @@ import
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17786319
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -415,41 +381,153 @@ trait ClientBase extends Logging {
GitHub user rnowling opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2459
[MLLib] Fix example code variable name misspelling in MLLib Feature
Extraction guide
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17786722
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientDistributedCacheManager.scala
---
@@ -19,29 +19,24 @@ package
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#issuecomment-56183509
This mostly looks good. A couple minor comments is all. I do also still
want to run through some tests on alpha.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rnowling commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2439#issuecomment-56183914
@ankurdave I'd be a bit concerned about how that affects the correctness of
the algorithm. Especially since this will round every value down when maybe
you only one to
Github user brndnmtthws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2453#issuecomment-56184849
I did indeed test it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user gss2002 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2241#issuecomment-56185334
We have been using this fix for a few weeks now against Hive 13. The only
outstanding issue I see and this could be something larger is the fact that
Spark Thrift
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17788554
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -415,41 +381,153 @@ trait ClientBase extends Logging {
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1297#discussion_r17790219
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/IndexedRDDLike.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1297#discussion_r17791303
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ImmutableLongOpenHashSet.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mattf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2313#issuecomment-56197446
for some additional input, @pwendell - do you think requiring numpy for
core would be acceptable?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user patmcdonough commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#discussion_r17794069
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,23 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1297#issuecomment-56199798
This looks great! my comments are minor.
I know its early to be discussing example docs, but I just wanted to
mention that I can see caching being an area of
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#issuecomment-56202513
@anantasty: If you could look through the code and mark places where you're
like What the heck is going on here, it would be easier for me to write up
proper comments.
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2440#issuecomment-56206573
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2453#issuecomment-56206744
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2456#issuecomment-56206732
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2457#issuecomment-56206727
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#discussion_r17796741
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -83,6 +83,15 @@ trait FutureAction[T] extends Future[T] {
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#issuecomment-56206738
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#discussion_r17796804
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureActionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#issuecomment-56207066
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20573/consoleFull)
for PR 2379 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-56207059
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20575/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2454#issuecomment-56207072
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20570/consoleFull)
for PR 2454 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2440#issuecomment-56207056
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20572/consoleFull)
for PR 2440 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#issuecomment-56207061
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20574/consoleFull)
for PR 2401 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2378#issuecomment-56207099
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20576/consoleFull)
for PR 2378 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2446#issuecomment-56207128
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20571/consoleFull)
for PR 2446 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2379#issuecomment-56207390
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20573/consoleFull)
for PR 2379 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2458#issuecomment-56207035
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20569/consoleFull)
for PR 2458 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#issuecomment-56207872
It would be good to test the complex case with multiple job ids, but
overall looks good. @rxin you added this interface - can you take a look (this
is a very small
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#discussion_r17797122
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -171,6 +179,8 @@ class ComplexFutureAction[T] extends FutureAction[T] {
// is
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56208207
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447#issuecomment-56208954
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20577/consoleFull)
for PR 2447 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2378#issuecomment-56210084
@mengxr PickleSerializer do not compress data, there is CompressSerializer
can do it using gzip(level 1). Compression can help for small range of double
or repeated
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2378#issuecomment-56211052
@mengxr In this PR, I just tried to avoid other changes except
serialization, we could change the cache behavior or compression later.
It's will be good to have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17798663
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientDistributedCacheManager.scala
---
@@ -19,29 +19,24 @@ package
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2440#issuecomment-56211203
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17798689
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -415,41 +381,153 @@ trait ClientBase extends Logging {
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17798769
--- Diff: sbin/slaves.sh ---
@@ -67,20 +69,26 @@ fi
if [ $HOSTLIST = ]; then
if [ $SPARK_SLAVES = ]; then
-export
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/151
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/726
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17799143
--- Diff: sbin/slaves.sh ---
@@ -67,20 +69,26 @@ fi
if [ $HOSTLIST = ]; then
if [ $SPARK_SLAVES = ]; then
-export
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#discussion_r17799162
--- Diff: .gitignore ---
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ conf/*.sh
conf/*.properties
conf/*.conf
conf/*.xml
+conf/slaves
--- End diff --
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2444#issuecomment-56212658
Made some comments. We need to guard this with a config parameter because
otherwise it will regress behavior on large clusters where serial vs parallel
ssh makes a big
Github user zhzhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2241#issuecomment-56212828
This patch does not include thrift patch, which will be fixed by other
jiras, because I don't want the scope is too big.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2450#discussion_r17799318
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -872,7 +872,12 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2350#discussion_r17799322
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -37,154 +36,106 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2440#issuecomment-56213954
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20572/consoleFull)
for PR 2440 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2458#issuecomment-56214025
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20569/consoleFull)
for PR 2458 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2450#discussion_r17799792
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -478,6 +482,15 @@ class PairRDDFunctionsSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2450#discussion_r17799890
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -478,6 +482,15 @@ class PairRDDFunctionsSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2453#issuecomment-56214417
There is a related PR #1940
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2453#issuecomment-56214347
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2450#discussion_r17800209
--- Diff: examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/AwsTest.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2450#issuecomment-56214986
Thanks for sending this. The approach seems solid. I made some small
comments in a few places.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2460
SPARK-3605. Fix typo in SchemaRDD.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sryza/spark sandy-spark-3605
Alternatively you can review and
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#discussion_r17800470
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureActionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2460#issuecomment-56215386
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20580/consoleFull)
for PR 2460 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2440#issuecomment-56215397
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20581/consoleFull)
for PR 2440 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#discussion_r17800549
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -171,6 +179,8 @@ class ComplexFutureAction[T] extends FutureAction[T] {
// is
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17800692
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -57,13 +250,709 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
* @param
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17800664
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -57,13 +250,709 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
* @param
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2461
[Docs] Fix outdated docs for standalone cluster
This is now supported!
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/andrewor14/spark
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17800699
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -57,13 +250,709 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
* @param
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17800687
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -37,11 +44,197 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17800735
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -57,13 +250,709 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
* @param
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2459#issuecomment-56216041
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20568/consoleFull)
for PR 2459 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2337#issuecomment-56216044
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20583/consoleFull)
for PR 2337 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#issuecomment-56216271
So, I'm a little disappointed that this doesn't at least follow the Yarn
model of one setting that defines the overhead. Instead, it has two settings,
one for a fraction
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17801072
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -37,11 +44,197 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2454#issuecomment-56216397
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20570/consoleFull)
for PR 2454 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#issuecomment-56216573
Could the methods be ordered in the file (grouped by public,
private[mllib], private, etc.?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#discussion_r17801264
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -57,13 +250,709 @@ trait Matrix extends Serializable {
* @param
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2451#issuecomment-56216806
Also, is it odd that the user can't access the matrix data, except via
toArray (or maybe side effects of the function given to map)?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#issuecomment-56216747
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20574/consoleFull)
for PR 2401 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-56216738
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20575/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2378#issuecomment-56216817
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/20576/consoleFull)
for PR 2378 at commit
Github user brndnmtthws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#issuecomment-56216904
I thought there was some desire to have the same thing also #1391?
Furthermore, from my experience writing frameworks, I think a much better
model is the
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
