GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2592
[SQL] Prevents per row dynamic dispatching and pattern matching when
inserting Hive values
Builds all wrappers at first according to object inspector types to avoid
per row costs.
TODO:
Github user Ishiihara commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2470#issuecomment-57274044
@rxin I looked through Roaring bitmap and that is a highly compressed
bitmap compared with other bitmap implementations. I will start working on this
and keep you updat
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18201286
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -787,31 +791,110 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
/**
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18201230
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -787,31 +791,110 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
/**
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18201208
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -787,31 +791,110 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
/**
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18201177
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -787,31 +791,110 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
/**
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18201113
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18201102
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r1820
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18201096
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18201085
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2241#issuecomment-57273157
Hey @zhzhan I've published a modified version of Hive 0.13 that we can link
against. A few benefits is:
1. I fixed the hive-exec jar so it only contains hive pac
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18201011
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#discussion_r18200976
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/ApplicationId.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under on
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200937
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2586
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57272803
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/207/consoleFull)
for PR 2529 at commit
[`4c18c29`](https://github.com/
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2586#issuecomment-57272762
LGTM. Merging into master and 1.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200872
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/python/PythonDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2330#issuecomment-57272680
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21025/consoleFull)
for PR 2330 at commit
[`0dae310`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2563#issuecomment-57272666
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/210/consoleFull)
for PR 2563 at commit
[`03da3ec`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2591#issuecomment-57272501
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57272306
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21020/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
[`f6af132`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57272310
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#issuecomment-57272298
Awesome! I just started working on this last weekend and you've already got
done :) Left some minor comments. This generally LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#issuecomment-57272266
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/209/consoleFull)
for PR 2590 at commit
[`ba26cd1`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57272186
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21022/consoleFull)
for PR 2588 at commit
[`6dab2e3`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57272188
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57272107
It worked because askSlaves was true and the driver always queries the
slaves in your afterUnpersist test. The problem is with regard to reporting,
not whether the block its
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2591#issuecomment-57271920
We should also cherrypick this into branch-1.0.
Master branch has been fixed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57271851
Actually, I took a look, it does test that. So I am not sure how it was
passing earlier some of the times.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2591
[SPARK-3709] Executors don't always report broadcast block removal properly
back to the driver (for branch-1.1)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#discussion_r18200542
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user ypwais commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1890#issuecomment-57271841
Any chance this might make it into v1.2? I'd love to use custom
{Input,Output}Formats (e.g. Parquet) and I personally spent almost a day after
getting bitten by this clas
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/771#issuecomment-57271768
Because they were private spark. It is very inconvenient for someone to
write his/her own recovery mode with all that private spark. + This felt like
developer facing A
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57271603
Yes - can you submit one? I'm going to merge this because it has been
blocking a lot of other patches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#discussion_r18200443
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57271368
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/208/consoleFull)
for PR 2529 at commit
[`4c18c29`](https://github.com/a
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57271331
Isnt there a way to augment the existing tests to make sure that the state
in the driver (blockmanagermaster) is cleared after removing tests?
---
If your project is set up
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#discussion_r18200397
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContext.scala ---
@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ class LocalHiveContext(sc: SparkContext) extends
HiveCo
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18200328
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -787,31 +791,110 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
/**
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#discussion_r18200330
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#discussion_r18200319
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57270939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#discussion_r18200306
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18200286
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +112,9 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
MetadataCleanerType
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2366#discussion_r18200248
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -787,31 +791,110 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
/**
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200194
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ def __ne__(self, other):
def __repr__(self):
return "<%s object>" % self.__c
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200181
--- Diff: python/pyspark/accumulators.py ---
@@ -256,3 +256,8 @@ def _start_update_server():
thread.daemon = True
thread.start()
return
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200173
--- Diff: bin/pyspark ---
@@ -87,11 +87,7 @@ export PYSPARK_SUBMIT_ARGS
if [[ -n "$SPARK_TESTING" ]]; then
unset YARN_CONF_DIR
unset HADOOP_CON
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2470#issuecomment-57270495
I also filed a new jira for the compressed bitmap thing:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3740
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2470
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2470#issuecomment-57270302
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200124
--- Diff: python/pyspark/accumulators.py ---
@@ -256,3 +256,8 @@ def _start_update_server():
thread.daemon = True
thread.start()
retu
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57270205
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57270130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57270125
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21019/consoleFull)
for PR 2588 at commit
[`f430686`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2470#issuecomment-57270082
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/206/consoleFull)
for PR 2470 at commit
[`822ff54`](https://github.com/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57270069
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/205/consoleFull)
for PR 2588 at commit
[`f430686`](https://github.com/
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2538#discussion_r18200031
--- Diff: bin/pyspark ---
@@ -87,11 +87,7 @@ export PYSPARK_SUBMIT_ARGS
if [[ -n "$SPARK_TESTING" ]]; then
unset YARN_CONF_DIR
unset HADOOP_C
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2576#issuecomment-57269751
@cloud-fan, has not since #2475 has not merged to master. @marmbrus can you
take a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57269637
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/207/consoleFull)
for PR 2529 at commit
[`4c18c29`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57269335
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57269222
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21022/consoleFull)
for PR 2588 at commit
[`6dab2e3`](https://github.com/ap
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2559#discussion_r18199560
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -74,7 +81,7 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends FunSui
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2529#issuecomment-57268536
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2432#issuecomment-57268365
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21020/consoleFull)
for PR 2432 at commit
[`f6af132`](https://github.com/ap
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#issuecomment-57268296
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2581
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2581#issuecomment-57267027
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266871
@nchammas - would you be interested in submitting a pr to change the qa
script so that the timeout and failure message already prints the commit hash?
---
If your project i
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266877
**[Tests timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/204/consoleFull)**
after a configured wait of `120m`.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266831
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266826
**[Tests timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21014/consoleFull)**
after a configured wait of `120m`.
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590#issuecomment-57266684
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2470#issuecomment-57266700
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/206/consoleFull)
for PR 2470 at commit
[`822ff54`](https://github.com/a
GitHub user ravipesala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2590
[SPARK-3654][SQL] Implement all extended HiveQL statements/commands with a
separate parser combinator
Created separate parser for hql. It preparses the commands like
cache,uncache,add jar etc..
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266321
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/205/consoleFull)
for PR 2588 at commit
[`f430686`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266312
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21019/consoleFull)
for PR 2588 at commit
[`f430686`](https://github.com/ap
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#discussion_r18198828
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerSlaveActor.scala ---
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ class BlockManagerSlaveActor(
SparkEnv.get
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57266259
@aarondav I already merged this actually...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user rxin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2585
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2585#issuecomment-57266183
Replaced by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57265739
Make sure you backport in 0.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2588#issuecomment-57265715
LGTM. Merging into master, branch-1.1, and branch-1.0. Should I also
backport to branch-0.9?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2559#issuecomment-57265653
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21018/consoleFull)
for PR 2559 at commit
[`199a85d`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2589#issuecomment-57265671
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21017/consoleFull)
for PR 2589 at commit
[`5f0d75b`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2559#issuecomment-57265657
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2589#issuecomment-57265675
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2241#issuecomment-57265563
I meant those implicit classes and methods.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zhzhan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2241#discussion_r18198152
--- Diff: sql/hive/pom.xml ---
@@ -119,6 +83,74 @@
+ hive-default
+
+
+ !hive.version
--
Github user zhzhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2241#issuecomment-57264575
@yhuai Can you be more specific regarding the comments: "I think those
implicits are not necessary. Can you change those?"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2589
[SPARK-3739] [SQL] Update the split num base on block size for table
scanning
Source file input split is probably better based on block size of HDFS,
while scanning Hive table, other than th
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2576#issuecomment-57261596
Have you considered cooperate with
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user huifeidemaer commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#discussion_r18197041
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/TopicModeling.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,818 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2570#issuecomment-57261085
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21016/consoleFull)
for PR 2570 at commit
[`4ea462c`](https://github.com/ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57260813
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57260810
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21015/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
[`298c720`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2388#issuecomment-57260729
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21015/consoleFull)
for PR 2388 at commit
[`298c720`](https://github.com/ap
1 - 100 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
