GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2690
[SPARK-3829] Make Spark logo image on the header of HistoryPage as a link
to HistoryPage's page #1
There is a Spark logo on the header of HistoryPage.
We can have too many HistoryPages if we run
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2690#issuecomment-58145012
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21369/consoleFull)
for PR 2690 at commit
[`dd87480`](https://github.com/ap
GitHub user mmalohlava opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2691
[SPARK-3270] Spark API for Application Extensions
SPARK-3270: Initial proposal of application extensions.
The change set introduces:
* Spark extension API to implement
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2691#issuecomment-58146366
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2691#issuecomment-58146963
This seems quite heavyweight compared to Patrick's suggestion of just using
a static object. Why the need for custom logic to load classes? (which even
opens up security q
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2689#issuecomment-58148670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2689#issuecomment-58148662
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21367/consoleFull)
for PR 2689 at commit
[`d5b874a`](https://github.com/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-58149038
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21368/consoleFull)
for PR 2624 at commit
[`a69f30c`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624#issuecomment-58149042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2690#issuecomment-58150433
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2690#issuecomment-58150425
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21369/consoleFull)
for PR 2690 at commit
[`dd87480`](https://github.com/a
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692
[SPARK-3831] Filter rule Improvement and bool expression optimization.
If we write the filter which is always FALSE like
SELECT * from person WHERE FALSE;
200 tasks will run. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58178035
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21370/consoleFull)
for PR 2692 at commit
[`8ea872b`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58179115
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21370/consoleFull)
for PR 2692 at commit
[`8ea872b`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58179119
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2030#issuecomment-58183559
We had a build against the spark master on Oct 2, and when ran our
application with data around 600GB, we got the following exception. Does this
PR fix this issue which is
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58186913
@sarutak LGTM. Can you take a look at the failing test?
The log is
```
[info] - NOT (i < 88) *** FAILED ***
[info] 2 did not equal 10 Wrong number of read
Github user shijinkui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2643#issuecomment-58187162
in the intellij IDEA, too much yellow tips to fix.
after changing, the code looks better.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2675#issuecomment-58188701
Hi @liancheng, I think i get the root cause here. In TestHive.scala we
reset the log4j level
```
// HACK: Hive is too noisy by default.
org.apache.log
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58190309
@yhuai Thanks picking this PR up and for your comment!
I'll try soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2693
[SPARK-3832][MLlib] Upgrade Breeze dependency to 0.10
In Breeze 0.10, the L1regParam can be configured through anonymous function
in OWLQN, and each component can be penalized differently. This is re
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2693#issuecomment-58192163
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21371/consoleFull)
for PR 2693 at commit
[`7a0c45c`](https://github.com/ap
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2577#issuecomment-58197006
Thanks @andrewor14. I've merged this into 1.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2577
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2030#issuecomment-58201237
It could be fixed by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2624
It's strange that I can not see this comment on PR #2030.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:28 AM, DB
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2693#issuecomment-58202720
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21371/consoleFull)
for PR 2693 at commit
[`7a0c45c`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2693#issuecomment-58202731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58203345
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21372/consoleFull)
for PR 2692 at commit
[`a11b9f3`](https://github.com/ap
Github user jameszhouyi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2646#issuecomment-58205767
Hi @davies @JoshRosen
Found below errors after add 'time' in run-tests
Running PySpark tests. Output is in python/unit-tests.log.
Testing with Python
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58209751
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2647#issuecomment-58209752
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2520#issuecomment-58209766
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58209763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58210133
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2520#issuecomment-58210179
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58210228
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2647#issuecomment-58210261
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#discussion_r18529676
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/PartitionBatchPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -67,10 +67,11 @@ class PartitionBatchPruningSuite exten
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58210908
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21379/consoleFull)
for PR 2612 at commit
[`b0585da`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2647#issuecomment-58210898
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21377/consoleFull)
for PR 2647 at commit
[`ad1f96e`](https://github.com/ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-5827
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-5823
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21372/consoleFull)
for PR 2692 at commit
[`a11b9f3`](https://github.com/a
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#discussion_r18530534
--- Diff: dev/lint-windows-cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#discussion_r18530666
--- Diff: dev/lint-windows-cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#discussion_r18530699
--- Diff: dev/lint-windows-cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58211878
@yhuai Thanks, it make sense.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2520#issuecomment-58210929
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21380/consoleFull)
for PR 2520 at commit
[`de91bbd`](https://github.com/ap
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58212070
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58212418
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21381/consoleFull)
for PR 2692 at commit
[`23c750c`](https://github.com/ap
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58212737
Thanks @nchammas , I've done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58212936
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58213209
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21382/consoleFull)
for PR 2612 at commit
[`cfaa176`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58214144
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21383/consoleFull)
for PR 2661 at commit
[`8b64bb7`](https://github.com/ap
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2030#issuecomment-58214186
I thought it was a close issue, so I moved my comment to JIRA. I ran into
this issue in spark-shell not the standalone application, does SPARK-3762
apply in this sit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2646#issuecomment-58214253
What shell are you running it in?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2673#issuecomment-58216712
Thanks for the explanation. The issue with the Scala versions makes sense.
What threw me off was the Hadoop example: I've always seen people say that the
Spark API is inde
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2682#issuecomment-58216947
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21384/consoleFull)
for PR 2682 at commit
[`701d4fb`](https://github.com/ap
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1980#discussion_r18532610
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -205,10 +231,74 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
ServerI
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-58218797
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21385/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
[`cb951cc`](https://github.com/ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-58218990
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21385/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
[`cb951cc`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-58218992
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user akopich commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-58220390
Unfortunately, our cluster is unavailable due to some technical issues.
Probably, the problem you report is related to the fact that `backgound :
Array[Float]` in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58220515
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21381/consoleFull)
for PR 2692 at commit
[`23c750c`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58220527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2692#issuecomment-58221944
LGTM
cc @marmbrus.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2693#issuecomment-58221886
@dbtsai Could you check whether there is any dependency change in
breeze-0.10 and the number of files in breeze-0.10 jar? Does it compatible with
both Scala 2.10 and 2.11?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2520#issuecomment-58222074
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2647#issuecomment-58222518
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21377/consoleFull)
for PR 2647 at commit
[`ad1f96e`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2647#issuecomment-58222529
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58222629
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58222616
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21379/consoleFull)
for PR 2612 at commit
[`b0585da`](https://github.com/a
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18534397
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -142,48 +151,56 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18534494
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -142,48 +151,56 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-58222849
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2520#issuecomment-58222059
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21380/consoleFull)
for PR 2520 at commit
[`de91bbd`](https://github.com/a
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18534683
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -142,48 +151,56 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2681#discussion_r18534899
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/TorrentBroadcast.scala ---
@@ -161,6 +178,10 @@ private[spark] class TorrentBroadcast[T: ClassTag](
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2681#discussion_r18534919
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/BroadcastSuite.scala ---
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ class BroadcastSuite extends FunSuite with
LocalSparkConte
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18535127
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -214,29 +231,64 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58224711
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21382/consoleFull)
for PR 2612 at commit
[`cfaa176`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2612#issuecomment-58224721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2650#issuecomment-58224804
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18535195
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -688,41 +691,34 @@ private[spark] class Master(
def rebuildSparkUI(app:
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2649#issuecomment-58225142
Ah so you really mean when using viewFS. You can use federation without
viewfs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2673#issuecomment-58225042
Hi @pwendell, I had a similar issue related to artifacts in Maven Central
and Hadoop versions.
Could you take a look at
[SPARK-3764](https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18535305
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -688,41 +691,34 @@ private[spark] class Master(
def rebuildSparkUI(app:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18535329
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -58,43 +61,79 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener(
p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58225743
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21383/consoleFull)
for PR 2661 at commit
[`8b64bb7`](https://github.com/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-58225756
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/2
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18535605
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ReplayListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -17,74 +17,43 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2650#issuecomment-58226025
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21387/consoleFull)
for PR 2650 at commit
[`0e36be7`](https://github.com/ap
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r18535871
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -128,125 +165,140 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener(
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2649#issuecomment-58227159
No necessarily; this affects HA too, which uses the hdfs protocol, not
viewfs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2688#issuecomment-58227253
This is a little wordy. Throughout Spark the log messages are intentionally
terse. Something like below cuts down on words a lot but has just as much
information.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#discussion_r18536661
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSamplerSuite.scala ---
@@ -18,96 +18,547 @@
package org.apache.spark.util.random
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#discussion_r18536639
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSampler.scala ---
@@ -39,13 +42,46 @@ trait RandomSampler[T, U] extends Pseudorandom with
Clo
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#discussion_r18536657
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSamplerSuite.scala ---
@@ -18,96 +18,547 @@
package org.apache.spark.util.random
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#discussion_r18536653
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSamplerSuite.scala ---
@@ -18,96 +18,547 @@
package org.apache.spark.util.random
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#discussion_r18536673
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSamplerSuite.scala ---
@@ -18,96 +18,547 @@
package org.apache.spark.util.random
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2455#discussion_r18536693
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/RandomSamplerSuite.scala ---
@@ -18,96 +18,547 @@
package org.apache.spark.util.random
1 - 100 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
