Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#discussion_r23283721
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn
import sc
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70799955
We should warn about this in standalone mode and mesos coarse grained mode
as well, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4133#issuecomment-70800435
[Test build #25880 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25880/consoleFull)
for PR 4133 at commit
[`77678fe`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4133#issuecomment-70800443
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23284115
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -238,6 +245,10 @@ case class InputMetrics(readMethod:
DataReadMethod.Value) {
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23284154
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -317,4 +338,9 @@ class ShuffleWriteMetrics extends Serializable {
* Tim
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23284162
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ import org.apache.spark._
import org.apache.spark.annotation.Develo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3821#issuecomment-70801020
[Test build #25881 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25881/consoleFull)
for PR 3821 at commit
[`a9b78d3`](https://gith
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23284264
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/BlockStoreShuffleFetcher.scala
---
@@ -82,7 +82,15 @@ private[hash] object BlockStoreShuffleFetcher
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3821#issuecomment-70801024
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#discussion_r23284251
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/BlockStoreShuffleFetcher.scala
---
@@ -82,7 +82,15 @@ private[hash] object BlockStoreShuffleFetcher
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#issuecomment-70801372
[Test build #25879 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25879/consoleFull)
for PR 3921 at commit
[`9da56f8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#issuecomment-70801376
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user tolgap commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-70801697
@avulanov How many neurons does the output layer have in this case? 1 or
10? Because my current implementation has an output layer of 10 neurons, e.g:
```scala
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4134
[SPARK-4654][CORE] Clean up DAGScheduler getMissingParentStages /
stageDependsOn methods
This is a follow up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3515 with some
minor fix.
@JoshRosen do yo
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70802105
@sryza
In standalone and mesos mode it is a bit different. JIRA is
here:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5337
Seems like @CodingCat has created
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4134#issuecomment-70802189
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70802269
What if app.coresLeft < app.desc.coreNumPerTask?
And should we fix the same issue in mesos mode in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4107#issuecomment-70803084
@yhuai @marmbrus It would be great if you can help reviewing this when you
have time. This is not super urgent though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user jackylk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70803953
Please run the test again. I tested all sql and hive test case locally, and
no error is reported. I am not sure why online test fails
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4133#issuecomment-70804009
Spark.testing should already be set for all tests. Is that needed ? What is
the problem briefly and what does this fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135
[SPARK-5205][Streaming]:Inconsistent behaviour between Streaming job and
others, when click kill link in WebUI
The "kill" link is used to kill a stage in job. It works in any kinds of
Spark job bu
Github user uncleGen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4008#issuecomment-70804703
@JoshRosen Since my local branch is out of date and this PR contains merge
conflicts, I will open a [new PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135)
and close this fi
Github user uncleGen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4008
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70805185
[Test build #25882 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25882/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`c90a288`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70805248
[Test build #25882 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25882/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`c90a288`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70805253
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70805768
[Test build #25883 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25883/consoleFull)
for PR 4123 at commit
[`d03d6fa`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70806362
[Test build #25884 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25884/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`fc3be2c`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3821#issuecomment-70806372
[Test build #25885 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25885/consoleFull)
for PR 3821 at commit
[`f3709f4`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70806543
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70806538
[Test build #25884 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25884/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`fc3be2c`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70807559
[Test build #25886 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25886/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`d85dede`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70808154
[Test build #25887 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25887/consoleFull)
for PR 4123 at commit
[`9632d3a`](https://githu
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70808340
Actually when cluster has not enough cores, the driver will also hang up. I
made a trivial change here and hope it would not make much noise for this pr.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70814056
[Test build #25883 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25883/consoleFull)
for PR 4123 at commit
[`d03d6fa`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70814065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3821#issuecomment-70814842
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3821#issuecomment-70814836
[Test build #25885 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25885/consoleFull)
for PR 3821 at commit
[`f3709f4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70816298
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-70816290
[Test build #25886 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25886/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`d85dede`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70817246
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70817239
[Test build #25887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25887/consoleFull)
for PR 4123 at commit
[`9632d3a`](https://gith
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70823105
Hiï¼ @WangTaoTheTonic , if app.coresLeft < app.desc.coreNumPerTask, we
should not assign more cores to the executor...as those cores will just be
wasted since we canno
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70825357
just upload the fix for Mesos...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70825694
[Test build #25888 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25888/consoleFull)
for PR 4129 at commit
[`619c8b9`](https://githu
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4134#discussion_r23294907
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -349,34 +349,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
private def
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4013#issuecomment-70830314
Oh? Should I close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3890#issuecomment-70832740
[Test build #25889 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25889/consoleFull)
for PR 3890 at commit
[`020a9e2`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70833826
[Test build #25888 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25888/consoleFull)
for PR 4129 at commit
[`619c8b9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70833836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299327
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -541,17 +541,17 @@ private[spark] class Master(
// in the qu
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299355
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -567,10 +567,12 @@ private[spark] class Master(
} else {
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299503
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,7 +78,11 @@ private[spark] class SparkD
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299588
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,7 +78,11 @@ private[spark] class SparkD
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299681
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,7 +78,11 @@ private[spark] class SparkDeployS
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299757
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -87,7 +89,12 @@ private[spark] class
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23299862
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -87,7 +89,12 @@ private[spark] class Coarse
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r2332
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,7 +78,11 @@ private[spark] class SparkD
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23300122
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -78,7 +78,11 @@ private[spark] class SparkDeployS
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#discussion_r23300256
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -87,7 +89,12 @@ private[spark] class Coarse
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3890#issuecomment-70843031
[Test build #25889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25889/consoleFull)
for PR 3890 at commit
[`020a9e2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3890#issuecomment-70843039
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#discussion_r23303748
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala ---
@@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Array[St
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3999#issuecomment-70850713
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-70851442
Sorry its not clear to me, by pyspark I meant the interactive /bin/pyspark,
is this intended to make the interactive python shell work or just batch mode
specify the py
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3916#discussion_r23305535
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/SparkLauncher.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3916#discussion_r23306196
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/AbstractLauncher.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,461 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70858064
@tgravescs Updated as you said. Perhaps we should do the same change in
`ExecutorAllocationManager`, but I am not familiar with that future, so let's
leave it wit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70858047
[Test build #25890 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25890/consoleFull)
for PR 4123 at commit
[`6c9676a`](https://githu
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3916#issuecomment-70857354
At some point we should put some documentation in the .md files about the
library and how to use it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70859826
I agree, the text was that way in ExecutorAllocationManager so lets leave
it for now.
This looks good. Thanks @WangTaoTheTonic
---
If your project is set up
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4136
[SPARK-5351][GraphX] Do not use Partitioner.defaultPartitioner as a
partitioner of EdgeRDDImp...
If the value of 'spark.default.parallelism' does not match the number of
partitoins in EdgePartition(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4136#issuecomment-70867791
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3765#issuecomment-70869778
looks good. Thanks @sryza
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user tpanningnextcen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4137
[SPARK-5176] The thrift server does not support cluster mode
Output an error message if the thrift server is started in cluster mode.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3765
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4137#issuecomment-70870989
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#discussion_r23312771
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -193,17 +193,21 @@ class HadoopRDD[K, V](
override def getPartitions: Array[
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#discussion_r23313017
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70871880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4123#issuecomment-70871868
[Test build #25890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25890/consoleFull)
for PR 4123 at commit
[`6c9676a`](https://gith
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#discussion_r23313220
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#issuecomment-70872378
So are you trying to add security such that spark cluster would run as one
superuser who would have to be configured as proxy user on the hadoop cluster
and then each j
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#issuecomment-70874289
[Test build #25891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25891/consoleFull)
for PR 3610 at commit
[`a2ebbd3`](https://githu
Github user gzm0 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4130#discussion_r23314675
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +91,14 @@ class ExecutorClassLoader(conf: SparkConf, classUri:
String
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4089
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4103#discussion_r23318708
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/configuration/BoostingStrategy.scala
---
@@ -88,4 +88,25 @@ object BoostingStrategy {
Github user gzm0 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4130#issuecomment-70878284
Just added a JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3200#discussion_r23319267
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3975#issuecomment-70897863
@mengxr I agree that setup is simplest, in that it makes users consciously
handle all re-labeling explicitly. I'm OK with it if we add data validation at
the start of
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3200#discussion_r23318868
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#issuecomment-70881554
I think you can use `describe formatted ` to get the
information of a table. You should be able to find `InputFormat` and
`OutputFormat` in the output. We can just double c
Github user rnowling commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-70887128
@leahmcguire The updated patch looks great to me. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4129#issuecomment-70884543
[Test build #25893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25893/consoleFull)
for PR 4129 at commit
[`9f2a8be`](https://githu
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4013#issuecomment-70879610
Yes, please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23322992
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-70897566
[Test build #25894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25894/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
[`0313c0c`](https://gith
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4106#discussion_r23320905
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
