Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71983693
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71983685
[Test build #26299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26299/consoleFull)
for PR 4260 at commit
[`73466c1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71983353
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71983349
[Test build #26298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26298/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`dc7dcd7`](https://gith
Github user cleaton commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3868#issuecomment-71982990
Thank you for the comments @tdas . I think the diff file for this PR has
become a bit misleading. It looks like there is more change than there actually
is. This is a sum
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#issuecomment-71982832
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-71982680
Hey so in case it's not clear, the issue is that because Akka makes no
guarantees whatsoever about compatibility, we need to define our own protocol
if we want the stand
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71982547
is the problem partitionsRDD transient?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71982365
[Test build #26301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26301/consoleFull)
for PR 4264 at commit
[`ba716cb`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71982373
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71982263
@rxin The ALS join code is much easier to read now:) I hope UDFs can be
used as functions instead of an argument of `callUDF`. Besides, it would be
nice to interpret strin
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4214#discussion_r23750788
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -53,8 +79,10 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4214#discussion_r23750759
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -113,12 +129,12 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(con
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71981965
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71981959
[Test build #26302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26302/consoleFull)
for PR 3798 at commit
[`80fd6ae`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#discussion_r23750711
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -133,13 +123,14 @@ class ALSModel private[ml] (
}
}
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4261#discussion_r23750587
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -397,6 +397,11 @@ object TestSettings {
testOptions += Tests.Argument(TestFrameworks.JUnit, "-v", "-a"),
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#discussion_r23750396
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -133,15 +132,14 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[ml]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71981094
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user viper-kun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71981089
[Test build #26300 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26300/consoleFull)
for PR 4263 at commit
[`e097b4d`](https://gith
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4214#discussion_r23750085
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -163,9 +179,6 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4234#issuecomment-71979899
Adding `count()` calls would be good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4059#issuecomment-71978609
[Test build #26303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26303/consoleFull)
for PR 4059 at commit
[`2e14d82`](https://githu
Github user FlytxtRnD commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4059#issuecomment-71978435
The PR is updated according to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4088
which modifies GaussianMixtureModel to expose instances of MutlivariateGaussian
rather than se
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4257#issuecomment-71976462
15/01/26 22:38:37 INFO SparkContext: RDD.toDebugString:
(12) MappedRDD[13] at map at dagPrint.scala:26 []
| MappedRDD[12] at map at dagPrint.scala:25 []
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71975825
[Test build #26301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26301/consoleFull)
for PR 4264 at commit
[`ba716cb`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71975810
[Test build #26302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26302/consoleFull)
for PR 3798 at commit
[`80fd6ae`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71975823
[Test build #26300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26300/consoleFull)
for PR 4263 at commit
[`e097b4d`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71975805
[Test build #26298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26298/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`dc7dcd7`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71975787
[Test build #26299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26299/consoleFull)
for PR 4260 at commit
[`73466c1`](https://githu
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71975259
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71975294
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71975278
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71975308
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71975248
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71975286
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71975091
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71975011
i will kick this off again once i restart jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71975104
i will kick this off again once i restart jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71975061
i will kick this off again once i restart jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71975044
i will kick this off again once i restart jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71975031
i will kick this off again once i restart jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23748806
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/kafka/OffsetRange.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71974801
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71974799
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71974805
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71973865
[Test build #26293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26293/consoleFull)
for PR 4262 at commit
[`84250a8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71973870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71972580
Great!
The offset range is the one which is still tricky. Lets brainstorm on it a
bit more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23747942
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/kafka/OffsetRange.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71972191
I'm thinking it would be useful for a separate PR to add some information
about how many nodes of the cluster are up during a cluster launch like this:
```
W
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4257#issuecomment-71972197
You can print the same details by calling rdd.toDebugString in your program
?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264#issuecomment-71971852
[Test build #26297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26297/consoleFull)
for PR 4264 at commit
[`ba716cb`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#issuecomment-71971690
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#issuecomment-71971685
[Test build #26290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26290/consoleFull)
for PR 4068 at commit
[`d9cf8fd`](https://gith
GitHub user ScrapCodes opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4264
[SPARK-5475][CORE] Java 8 tests are like maintenance overhead.
Having tests that validate the same code compatible with java 8 and java 7
is like asserting that java 8 is backward compatible with
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71971574
> FWIW I actually found the dots useful to figure out how long the script
was going to wait before trying again
I find this useful too, but it doesn't work when
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4261#issuecomment-71971280
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4261#issuecomment-71971275
[Test build #26288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26288/consoleFull)
for PR 4261 at commit
[`41647ef`](https://gith
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71971288
The idea of printing the error message sounds good to me. FWIW I actually
found the dots useful to figure out how long the script was going to wait
before trying again -
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#discussion_r23747469
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -285,11 +285,22 @@ class Analyzer(catalog: Catalog,
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23747450
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/kafka/KafkaCluster.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4248#issuecomment-71970984
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4248#issuecomment-71970979
[Test build #26289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26289/consoleFull)
for PR 4248 at commit
[`4aedc06`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71970610
[Test build #26296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26296/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`dc7dcd7`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263#issuecomment-71970609
[Test build #26295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26295/consoleFull)
for PR 4263 at commit
[`e097b4d`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71970562
[Test build #26287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26287/consoleFull)
for PR 4260 at commit
[`d31fcd2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71970566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4263
[SPARK-5474][Build]curl should support URL redirection in build/mvn
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark SPARK-5474
Altern
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#discussion_r23746914
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -285,11 +285,22 @@ class Analyzer(catalog: Catalog,
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71969718
cc @shivaram @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71969716
[Test build #26294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26294/consoleFull)
for PR 4260 at commit
[`fab3ccc`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262#issuecomment-71969386
[Test build #26293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26293/consoleFull)
for PR 4262 at commit
[`84250a8`](https://githu
GitHub user nchammas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4262
[EC2] Expose SSH failures after status checks pass
If there is some fatal problem with launching a cluster, `spark-ec2` just
hangs without giving the user useful feedback on what the problem is.
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-71968759
packaging, makes sense
method name, agreed, named it createNewStream for now
offset range, see my explanation of the interface above. I think this is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71968586
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71968583
[Test build #26292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26292/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`a29`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71968285
[Test build #26291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26291/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`5b75cda`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71968286
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23746360
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/kafka/KafkaCluster.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71968251
[Test build #26292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26292/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`a29`](https://githu
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23746302
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ abstract class KafkaStreamSuiteBase
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23746262
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
createStre
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4259#issuecomment-71967929
[Test build #26291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26291/consoleFull)
for PR 4259 at commit
[`5b75cda`](https://githu
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23746235
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/kafka/OffsetRange.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4057#issuecomment-71967465
@yhuai Thanks for your comments! I'll modify this PR accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4068#issuecomment-71967503
[Test build #26290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26290/consoleFull)
for PR 4068 at commit
[`d9cf8fd`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4248#issuecomment-71966791
[Test build #26289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26289/consoleFull)
for PR 4248 at commit
[`4aedc06`](https://githu
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4248#issuecomment-7199
I was confused here whether to use manual clock or system clock ? Since
system clock made the test considerably faster. P.S. Test failures seems to
be unrelated(
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4248#issuecomment-71966684
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4261#issuecomment-71966019
[Test build #26288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26288/consoleFull)
for PR 4261 at commit
[`41647ef`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71965288
[Test build #26287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26287/consoleFull)
for PR 4260 at commit
[`d31fcd2`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4254#issuecomment-71965185
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4254#issuecomment-71965181
[Test build #26282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26282/consoleFull)
for PR 4254 at commit
[`c12dfc8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4258#issuecomment-71964178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4260#issuecomment-71963928
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4261#issuecomment-71964600
[Test build #26286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26286/consoleFull)
for PR 4261 at commit
[`a09eeac`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4261#issuecomment-71964607
[Test build #26286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26286/consoleFull)
for PR 4261 at commit
[`a09eeac`](https://gith
1 - 100 of 718 matches
Mail list logo
