Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72893619
[Test build #26763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26763/consoleFull)
for PR 3798 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72893647
Here's a solution for subclassing ConsumerConfig while still silencing the
warning.
My son is doing ok(ish) now, thanks for the concern.
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72884442
[Test build #26759 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26759/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72884625
[Test build #26759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26759/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72884631
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-72883811
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72886402
[Test build #26762 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26762/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3725#issuecomment-7237
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3725#issuecomment-7226
[Test build #26755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26755/consoleFull)
for PR 3725 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4369#issuecomment-72896935
[Test build #26757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26757/consoleFull)
for PR 4369 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4369#issuecomment-72896945
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4060#discussion_r24102921
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -231,6 +241,32 @@ private [sql] case class CreateTempTableUsing(
Github user deeppradhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72886835
The error file says that a particular line contains a tab, but I have
removed it. The error log says the same thing again. What does this mean?
---
If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3631#issuecomment-72903283
The first step would be to see whether upgrading to 0.8.2 passes the
inbuilt unit-tests or not (including the new Kafka stuff).
In addition, is there are
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72904323
[Test build #26765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26765/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72886585
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72885420
[Test build #26761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26761/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4249#issuecomment-72888527
[Test build #26754 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26754/consoleFull)
for PR 4249 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4249#issuecomment-72888537
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72886581
[Test build #26762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26762/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-72884418
[Test build #26760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26760/consoleFull)
for PR 4334 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72885611
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72885605
[Test build #26761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26761/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72902696
That's a nifty solution :) I like it.
Lets merge this as soon as the tests pass. Smaller changes like docs, etc.
, we can do it in the next PR.
@jerryshao I will
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-72899091
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-72899074
[Test build #26760 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26760/consoleFull)
for PR 4334 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72902389
Glad to hear that your son is doing ok, hope he gets better (okish--
great) real real soon. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4060#issuecomment-72902442
[Test build #26764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26764/consoleFull)
for PR 4060 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72808101
[Test build #26732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26732/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72808109
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4359#issuecomment-72808727
[Test build #26736 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26736/consoleFull)
for PR 4359 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4360#issuecomment-72809706
[Test build #26738 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26738/consoleFull)
for PR 4360 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72813069
Have you checked the GraphX example
https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/graphx-programming-guide.html#pregel-api?
It implemented single source shortest path.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72813240
[Test build #26741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26741/consoleFull)
for PR 4358 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4357#issuecomment-72820430
[Test build #26735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26735/consoleFull)
for PR 4357 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4360#issuecomment-72820259
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4360#issuecomment-72820245
[Test build #26738 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26738/consoleFull)
for PR 4360 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-72826762
[Test build #26744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26744/consoleFull)
for PR 4363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-72826767
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24068977
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +173,22 @@ trait Column extends DataFrame {
}
/**
+ *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24068994
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dsl.scala ---
@@ -177,6 +181,23 @@ object Dsl {
cols.toList.toSeq
}
+ /**
+
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4361
[SPARK-3619] Part 2. Upgrade to Mesos 0.21 to work around MESOS-1688
- MESOS_NATIVE_LIBRARY become deprecated
- Chagned MESOS_NATIVE_LIBRARY to MESOS_NATIVE_JAVA_LIBRARY
You can merge this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72811818
[Test build #26731 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26731/consoleFull)
for PR 4358 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72811846
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72811827
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72812747
[Test build #580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/580/consoleFull)
for PR 4358 at commit
Github user jeanlyn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4356#discussion_r24067924
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -207,13 +219,21 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
* If `filterOpt` is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24068933
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -2077,9 +2077,9 @@ def dtypes(self):
Return all column names and their data types as a list.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24068970
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -2651,6 +2650,16 @@ def approxCountDistinct(col, rsd=None):
jc =
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24068962
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -2593,6 +2553,45 @@ def _(col):
return staticmethod(_)
+class UserDefinedFunction(object):
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72809286
[Test build #26737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26737/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72810958
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72810950
[Test build #26733 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26733/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72812439
Merging this in master branch-1.3.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72817937
[Test build #26742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26742/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72817939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72817931
[Test build #26742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26742/consoleFull)
for PR 4362 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4361#issuecomment-72828002
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#discussion_r24072691
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -596,7 +597,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72806615
[Test build #26734 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26734/consoleFull)
for PR 4308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72808682
[Test build #577 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/577/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4360
[Minor] Fix incorrect warning log
The warning log looks incorrect. Just fix it.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/viirya/spark-1
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72810144
Thanks! I have merged this.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:30 PM, UCB AMPLab notificati...@github.com
wrote:
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3903#discussion_r24069478
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterActor.scala ---
@@ -52,11 +52,7 @@ class BlockManagerMasterActor(val isLocal: Boolean,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4361#issuecomment-72810794
[Test build #26739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26739/consoleFull)
for PR 4361 at commit
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4227#issuecomment-72819162
May AmplabJenkins test this please ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4357#issuecomment-72806869
[Test build #26730 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26730/consoleFull)
for PR 4357 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4357#issuecomment-72806876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72807964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72807954
[Test build #26727 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26727/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4357#issuecomment-72820443
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user shenh062326 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363
Add expireDeadHosts in HeartbeatReceiver
If a blockManager has not send heartBeat more than 120s,
BlockManagerMasterActor will remove it. But coarseGrainedSchedulerBackend can
only remove
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4361#issuecomment-72827994
[Test build #26739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26739/consoleFull)
for PR 4361 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4357#issuecomment-72808169
[Test build #26735 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26735/consoleFull)
for PR 4357 at commit
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4359
[SQL] support select/filter by SQL expression
```
df.select('a + 1', 'abs(age)')
df.filter('age 3')
df[ df.age 3 ]
df[ ['age', 'name'] ]
```
You can merge this pull request
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4359#issuecomment-72808387
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user deeppradhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72812228
What does that mean?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:27 PM, UCB AMPLab notificati...@github.com wrote:
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
Github user deeppradhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72813447
Yes, I have checked it out. This one is on pure Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4227#issuecomment-72819767
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-72826620
[Test build #26744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26744/consoleFull)
for PR 4363 at commit
Github user shenh062326 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-72826509
add [SPARK-5529]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user deeppradhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72826587
Do I need to add the license headers in the file?
The one which is there within /*Licensed to..under the license*/
in every file in the Spark examples?
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3903#discussion_r24069744
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterActor.scala ---
@@ -52,11 +52,7 @@ class BlockManagerMasterActor(val isLocal: Boolean,
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4360#issuecomment-72811276
Good catch. Merging this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72812838
[Test build #581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/581/consoleFull)
for PR 4358 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4227#issuecomment-72819908
[Test build #26743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26743/consoleFull)
for PR 4227 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72822646
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4308#issuecomment-72822582
[Test build #26734 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26734/consoleFull)
for PR 4308 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72822525
[Test build #577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/577/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4360
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user deeppradhan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362
Create SparkAPSP.scala
The input to the program is an edge list file. The format should be the
following, where each pair is an edge src_id dest_id
1 2
2 1
2 3
2 4
3 2
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4359#issuecomment-72811529
LGTM. Can you update the pr description to replace select with selectExpr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72812596
[Test build #579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/579/consoleFull)
for PR 4358 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72812543
[Test build #578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/578/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72812507
[Test build #26740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26740/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4362#issuecomment-72814864
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72907051
[Test build #26766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26766/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
1 - 100 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
