Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4373
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4373#issuecomment-73308129
Thanks! Merged to master and 1.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4424#issuecomment-73308025
[Test build #26938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26938/consoleFull)
for PR 4424 at commit
[`6dd8bee`](https://githu
GitHub user staslos opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4434
[SPARK-5657][Examples][PySpark] Add PySpark Avro Output Format example
There is an Avro Input Format example that shows how to read Avro data in
PySpark, but nothing shows how to write from PySpark
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4249#issuecomment-73307633
Thanks! Merged to master and 1.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4424#issuecomment-73307280
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4414#issuecomment-73307326
Btw, did you mean 1.2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4427#issuecomment-73307227
I don't think this is valid. You use backticks to escape cases where you
have invalid characters like `.` in your identifiers.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4414#issuecomment-73307181
Thanks for the review @JoshRosen. I'll tag the JIRA issue for backport.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4397
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4397#issuecomment-73306881
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4397#issuecomment-73306120
[Test build #26928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26928/consoleFull)
for PR 4397 at commit
[`f819b6c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4397#issuecomment-73306129
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3986#issuecomment-73305908
[Test build #26927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26927/consoleFull)
for PR 3986 at commit
[`13e257d`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4371#issuecomment-73305923
[Test build #26937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26937/consoleFull)
for PR 4371 at commit
[`af3ba14`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3986#issuecomment-73305913
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-73305737
[Test build #26931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26931/consoleFull)
for PR 4188 at commit
[`8e91cc3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#issuecomment-73305769
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#issuecomment-73305760
[Test build #26932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26932/consoleFull)
for PR 3233 at commit
[`3f768e3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-73305744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4371#issuecomment-73305408
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4432#issuecomment-73305358
Looks good, but not too familiar with this class
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4405#issuecomment-73305341
In this case, you are only running SparkSubmit as the proxy user. Should we
not have the executor code also run as the proxy user, so any writes from the
app to H
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4405#issuecomment-73305254
[Test build #26930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26930/consoleFull)
for PR 4405 at commit
[`b6c947d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4405#issuecomment-73305261
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4432#discussion_r24268769
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/JavaStreamingLinearRegressionSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4403#issuecomment-73305089
LGTM pending Jenkins; thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4431
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4431#issuecomment-73304864
Thanks! Merged to master and 1.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4426
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4426#issuecomment-73304622
Thanks! Merged to master and 1.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4162#issuecomment-73304383
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4414#issuecomment-73304352
Actually, I'm going to hold off on the `branch-1.2` (1.2.2) commit for now,
since there's a bit of divergence in that branch and I don't want to break
anything.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4162#issuecomment-73304375
[Test build #26924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26924/consoleFull)
for PR 4162 at commit
[`01ed464`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4414
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4414#issuecomment-73303739
LGTM. I'm going to pull this into `master` (1.4.0) and `branch-1.3`
(1.3.0). I'll also commit it to `branch-1.2` (1.2.2), but for that I'll update
the version number
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#issuecomment-73303658
[Test build #26936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26936/consoleFull)
for PR 4067 at commit
[`bd919be`](https://githu
Github user mingyukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4420#issuecomment-73303667
Can you elaborate on the "memory size as an additional heuristic" idea?
This is consistently causing OOMs in one of our workflows, which is exactly
what spilling to dis
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24268035
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -179,121 +182,190 @@ object KafkaUtils {
errs =
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24268021
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/OffsetRange.scala
---
@@ -19,16 +19,35 @@ package org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4311#issuecomment-73303308
In this particular case we might actually need separate PRs for 1.2 and the
Master because the event logs are produced differently there. I wonder if this
also applies
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4067#issuecomment-73303194
Jenkins, test this please. This LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4311#issuecomment-73303249
[Test build #26935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26935/consoleFull)
for PR 4311 at commit
[`5d9eedf`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4311#issuecomment-73303253
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4311#discussion_r24267784
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala
---
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(ar
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4403#issuecomment-73303027
[Test build #26934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26934/consoleFull)
for PR 4403 at commit
[`94c014e`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4311#issuecomment-73302969
[Test build #26935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26935/consoleFull)
for PR 4311 at commit
[`5d9eedf`](https://githu
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24267609
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -179,121 +182,190 @@ object KafkaUtils {
errs => thr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4433#issuecomment-73302682
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4433#issuecomment-73302672
[Test build #26929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26929/consoleFull)
for PR 4433 at commit
[`a604816`](https://gith
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24267569
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -179,121 +182,190 @@ object KafkaUtils {
errs => thr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4431#issuecomment-73302546
[Test build #26923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26923/consoleFull)
for PR 4431 at commit
[`c5da21e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4431#issuecomment-73302558
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4350
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4311#issuecomment-73302414
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4231#issuecomment-73302432
I'll do my best to look at it today---I hope!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4403#issuecomment-73302426
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4422#discussion_r24267412
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/recommendation/MatrixFactorizationModel.scala
---
@@ -136,3 +147,69 @@ class MatrixFactorizationModel
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4412#discussion_r24267365
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkEnv.scala ---
@@ -93,6 +93,14 @@ class SparkEnv (
// actorSystem.awaitTermination()
Github user cenyuhai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4398#discussion_r24267316
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ object BindReferences extends Log
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3959#issuecomment-73302243
[Test build #26933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26933/consoleFull)
for PR 3959 at commit
[`5425314`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4350#discussion_r24267256
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ Most of the configs are the same for Spark on YARN as
for other deployment modes
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4350#discussion_r24267242
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ Most of the configs are the same for Spark on YARN as
for other deployment modes
Github user haoyuan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4418#issuecomment-73301858
Thanks @viper-kun
Agree w/ @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4428#issuecomment-73301647
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4428#issuecomment-73301632
[Test build #26925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26925/consoleFull)
for PR 4428 at commit
[`ec18465`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/899#issuecomment-73301694
Hey @zeodtr I believe this is fixed in #3924 would you mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4418#issuecomment-73301472
I think we should create a JIRA for this, if only to help us keep track of
where this change is committed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4392#issuecomment-73301321
Hey @kasjain can you open this against the master branch next time? It will
be easier for us to back port stuff from there
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3959#issuecomment-73301377
yes, the tests are still not passing I believe, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3225
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user cenyuhai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4398#discussion_r24266591
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/dataTypes.scala ---
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
ob
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-73300317
To fix the YARN issue maybe we should do something specific there, like
escaping the double quotes before passing them to YARN?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4231#issuecomment-73300352
ping @jkbradley ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4422#discussion_r24266304
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/recommendation/MatrixFactorizationModel.scala
---
@@ -136,3 +147,69 @@ class MatrixFactorizationModel(
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-73299916
Hey @srowen it seems like this will break existing behavior though. What if
I want to run an application with the following arguments
```
a "b c" d
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-73299811
[Test build #26931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26931/consoleFull)
for PR 4188 at commit
[`8e91cc3`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4405#issuecomment-73299786
[Test build #26930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26930/consoleFull)
for PR 4405 at commit
[`b6c947d`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#issuecomment-73299761
[Test build #26932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26932/consoleFull)
for PR 3233 at commit
[`3f768e3`](https://githu
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#discussion_r24266009
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1283,6 +1291,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
if (inWord || i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4432#issuecomment-73298114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4432#issuecomment-73298105
[Test build #26922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26922/consoleFull)
for PR 4432 at commit
[`1f662b3`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#discussion_r24265176
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1283,6 +1291,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
if (inWord
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24265028
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -36,14 +36,12 @@ import kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4433#issuecomment-73297460
[Test build #26929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26929/consoleFull)
for PR 4433 at commit
[`a604816`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3225#discussion_r24264861
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -630,7 +634,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
SparkStatusAPI wit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3225#issuecomment-73296838
I think it's safe to say that we won't implement the alternative behavior
that @JoshRosen suggested by the release. For this reason I think we should at
least document
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4433#issuecomment-73296645
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4429#issuecomment-73296580
Merged into master and branch-1.3. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3225#discussion_r24264456
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -242,7 +242,11 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
SparkStatusAPI wit
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4385#issuecomment-73295741
@florianverhein This is looking good. Have you tested this against a fork
named `spark-ec2` as well as a fork named something else?
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4433#issuecomment-73295691
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4397#issuecomment-73295760
[Test build #26928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26928/consoleFull)
for PR 4397 at commit
[`f819b6c`](https://githu
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4385#discussion_r24264051
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -1007,6 +1023,11 @@ def real_main():
print >> stderr, "ebs-vol-num cannot be greater than 8"
sys.e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4397#issuecomment-73295369
ok to test @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
GitHub user mbittmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4433
[SPARK-5656] Fail gracefully for large values of k and/or n that will ex...
...ceed max int.
Large values of k and/or n in EigenValueDecomposition.symmetricEigs will
result in array initi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4334#issuecomment-73295273
I'm merging this into `master` (1.4.0) and `branch-1.3` (1.3.0).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
