Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#discussion_r25582380
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100,
initialWeights=None, regParam=0.01, regType
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-76671073
[Test build #28161 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28161/consoleFull)
for PR 2765 at commit
[`2068255`](https://githu
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4833
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4828#discussion_r25582261
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingTab.scala ---
@@ -29,19 +29,29 @@ import StreamingTab._
*/
private[spark]
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4828#discussion_r25582237
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -20,20 +20,26 @@ package org.apache.spark.streaming.ui
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76669704
[Test build #28158 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28158/consoleFull)
for PR 4821 at commit
[`59abee9`](https://gith
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4654#issuecomment-76669702
Hi, Sorry for taking so much time to get back to this. I want to generate
some random data to write this script using breeze. But I unable to understand
how the random
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76669712
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76668874
[Test build #28157 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28157/consoleFull)
for PR 4821 at commit
[`40e1ff6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76668879
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76667055
[Test build #28160 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28160/consoleFull)
for PR 4789 at commit
[`2453ebe`](https://githu
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#discussion_r25581012
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -850,7 +851,14 @@
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Enhanced+A
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-7392
[Test build #28159 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28159/consoleFull)
for PR 4821 at commit
[`7d6aa61`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-76665998
[Test build #28156 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28156/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`047931c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-7004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4847#issuecomment-76665628
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user peerside opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4847
Refactored Dataframe join comment to use correct parameter ordering
The API signatire for join requires the JoinType to be the third parameter.
The code examples provided for join show JoinType bei
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76663956
[Test build #28158 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28158/consoleFull)
for PR 4821 at commit
[`59abee9`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76663334
As of the latest commit I have removed the Spark version and the metadata.
Please have a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25579983
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ReplayListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -39,10 +39,9 @@ private[spark] class ReplayListenerBus extends
Spa
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25579955
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -322,28 +322,22 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25579899
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -322,28 +322,22 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf
Github user uncleGen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-76663454
@JoshRosen Could you please take a look again, thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25579888
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -322,28 +322,22 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4839#issuecomment-76663135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76663276
[Test build #28157 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28157/consoleFull)
for PR 4821 at commit
[`40e1ff6`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4839#issuecomment-76663130
[Test build #28155 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28155/consoleFull)
for PR 4839 at commit
[`3ab012c`](https://gith
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#discussion_r25579743
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -465,10 +465,14 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends HiveCompariso
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#discussion_r25579694
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -850,7 +851,14 @@
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Enhanced+Aggr
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25579333
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/ApplicationDescription.scala ---
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationDescription(
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4839#issuecomment-76660748
No it was based on the old code. Didn't get a chance to run this on the
cluster yet.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-76660466
[Test build #28156 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28156/consoleFull)
for PR 4135 at commit
[`047931c`](https://githu
GitHub user uncleGen reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135
[SPARK-5205][Streaming]:Inconsistent behaviour between Streaming job and
others, when click kill link in WebUI
The "kill" link is used to kill a stage in job. It works in any kinds of
Spark job
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4828#discussion_r25578794
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingTab.scala ---
@@ -29,19 +29,30 @@ import StreamingTab._
*/
private[spa
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4818#issuecomment-76659139
@vanzin okay so maybe set this to true then? I don't have any opinion, but
would love to get this in as it's one of the only release blockers.
---
If your project is se
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4839#issuecomment-76658178
[Test build #28155 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28155/consoleFull)
for PR 4839 at commit
[`3ab012c`](https://githu
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4839#issuecomment-76657966
@shivaram Fixed this, and @srowen thanks for pointing out the issue with
the GET_RESULT status!! Shivaram, did you run this patch on your cluster? Or
was your comm
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4846#issuecomment-76657370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4846#issuecomment-76657364
[Test build #28154 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28154/consoleFull)
for PR 4846 at commit
[`31aed64`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4826#issuecomment-76655461
A typo in the PR description:
> However, the nullability of `ArrayType(IntegerType, containsNull = true)`
is compatible with that of `ArrayType(IntegerType, con
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76655322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76655313
[Test build #28153 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28153/consoleFull)
for PR 4789 at commit
[`01abcce`](https://gith
Github user uncleGen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user tsingfu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4245#issuecomment-76655144
@sarutak I found #4209 has not solved the problem invalid metric name with
"" which introduced from #3812.
and I have a question: Is there difference between setting
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25577300
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/ApplicationDescription.scala ---
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationDescription(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25577271
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -217,57 +223,67 @@ private[spark] object EventLoggingListener ex
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4799#discussion_r25577265
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -92,6 +92,16 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
private val executorActo
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4812#issuecomment-76652801
@marmbrus, any comment on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4846#issuecomment-76652588
[Test build #28154 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28154/consoleFull)
for PR 4846 at commit
[`31aed64`](https://githu
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4846
[SPARK-6103][Graphx]remove unused class to import in EdgeRDDImpl
Class TaskContext is unused in EdgeRDDImpl, so we need to remove it from
import list.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76650894
[Test build #28153 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28153/consoleFull)
for PR 4789 at commit
[`01abcce`](https://githu
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76650849
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user uncleGen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-76650327
@JoshRosen Could you please take a look again, thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3629#issuecomment-76649122
ping @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4500#issuecomment-76648856
cc @rxin @marmbrus @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4532#issuecomment-76648469
@marmbrus @rxin Can it be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4532#issuecomment-76648238
@marmbrus @Cheng Lian Can it be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76648220
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76648025
@yhuai Can you trigger the test for me?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user larryxiao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2446#issuecomment-76647871
@nchammas
The QA test result is not available now, I'll run the test again tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4838#discussion_r25574579
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
* Remove all b
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76641955
I took a pass on this with some feedback. Overall, it would be good to
really minimize the scope of the changes since this is so late in the game.
There is some clean-up
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4844#issuecomment-76641808
Thanks, @srowen and @JoshRosen ,
So, shall we propogate this change to other classes in the deploy package,
in this PR or a different PR?
e.g.
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25574126
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ case class SparkListenerExecutorRemoved(time: Long,
exec
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#issuecomment-76641038
Merged into master and branch-1.3. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#issuecomment-76640956
Merged into master and branch-1.3. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25573931
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/ApplicationDescription.scala ---
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationDescription(
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25573801
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -217,57 +223,67 @@ private[spark] object EventLoggingListener exte
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25573776
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -217,57 +223,67 @@ private[spark] object EventLoggingListener exte
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4844#issuecomment-76639732
I'm in favor of this change. Even if this class is private within the
deploy package, keeping everything at the minimum visibility is a good
programming practice and m
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4799#discussion_r25573606
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -92,6 +92,16 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
private val executorActor
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2446#issuecomment-76636221
@ankurdave @larryxiao This PR has gone stale.
Do we want to update it, or close and revisit it later?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/792#issuecomment-76636143
This PR has gone stale. Through the discussion here, it seems like we want
this change, contingent on some updates.
@ankurdave @lianhuiwang Do we want to update t
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4833#issuecomment-76635980
@srowen Did something go wrong with the merge script? This PR is still open.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#issuecomment-76629958
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#issuecomment-76627491
[Test build #28151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28151/consoleFull)
for PR 4811 at commit
[`f135dac`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#issuecomment-76627473
[Test build #28152 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28152/consoleFull)
for PR 4834 at commit
[`1cdd7b5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#issuecomment-76627492
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#issuecomment-76627476
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#issuecomment-76627211
[Test build #28150 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28150/consoleFull)
for PR 4831 at commit
[`12db65a`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4841#issuecomment-76627198
Hm, then `actualCoresRequested` is not a good name, since it is not the
number requested. But then how is this different from `coresGranted`? there
seem to be only two val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#issuecomment-76627216
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4841#issuecomment-76626978
`requestedCores` is the core number set by user or as a default value
`Int.MaxValue`, which can be larger than actual cores gotten,
`actualCoresRequested` is the actual
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4837#discussion_r25570563
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/streaming/kafka_wordcount.py ---
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#quickstart
Github user kellrott closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4839#issuecomment-76626501
I'm not familiar enough with the UI code, but one more problem I have
noticed is that when the task is in the getting results stage, the UI shows
the time as execution
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#discussion_r25570059
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/util.py ---
@@ -168,6 +168,64 @@ def loadLabeledPoints(sc, path, minPartitions=None):
return callMLlibFunc("loadLabe
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4697#issuecomment-76623990
Since it has been fixed in master and branch-1.3, it will be great if we
can have the same changes with aa39460d4bb4c41084d350ccb1c5a56cd61239b7 for
branch-1.2.
---
If yo
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#issuecomment-76623656
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#issuecomment-76623530
[Test build #28152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28152/consoleFull)
for PR 4834 at commit
[`1cdd7b5`](https://githu
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#issuecomment-76623459
@mengxr fixed !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#discussion_r25569852
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100,
initialWeights=None, regParam=0.01, regType
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#issuecomment-76623310
[Test build #28151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28151/consoleFull)
for PR 4811 at commit
[`f135dac`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#issuecomment-76623304
[Test build #28150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28150/consoleFull)
for PR 4831 at commit
[`12db65a`](https://githu
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#issuecomment-76623265
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4831#issuecomment-76623257
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#discussion_r25569772
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -115,22 +115,31 @@ used for evaluation and prediction.
Note that the Python API does not yet support model
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4834#discussion_r25569774
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -115,22 +115,31 @@ used for evaluation and prediction.
Note that the Python API does not yet support model
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
