Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5328#issuecomment-88779434
[Test build #29593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29593/consoleFull)
for PR 5328 at commit
[`aaefb19`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5319#issuecomment-88779113
@vanzin do you mind making a PR for 1.2 branch for this fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user tsudukim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5328
[SPARK-6673] spark-shell.cmd can't start in Windows even when spark was
built
added equivalent script to load-spark-env.sh
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5324#issuecomment-88778174
[Test build #29592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29592/consoleFull)
for PR 5324 at commit
[`e5a51a2`](https://githu
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-88776457
Since the behavior is undefined in Scala, I think it is ok to return
anything, as I stated in comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r27635442
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r27635315
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -144,6 +145,12 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable {
ge
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r27635297
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JoinSuite.scala ---
@@ -75,9 +76,9 @@ class JoinSuite extends QueryTest with BeforeAndAfterEach
{
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-88772266
@adrian-wang I leave some comments, but I need some more time in review the
code of `SortMergeJoin`, will keep add more comments later. BTW, can you double
check i
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3247#issuecomment-88771801
Is it not possible to create that simple patch that removes DISTINCT
aggregation expressions?
We only add `distinct` as a field value in `AggregateExpresion`, and then
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5326#issuecomment-88771516
[Test build #29591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29591/consoleFull)
for PR 5326 at commit
[`b4cbabd`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5326#issuecomment-88771528
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5303#issuecomment-88770278
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5303#issuecomment-88770218
[Test build #29586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29586/consoleFull)
for PR 5303 at commit
[`9dc32d1`](https://gith
GitHub user pchanumolu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5327
Add status command to spark-daemon
SPARK-6671
Currently using the spark-daemon.sh script we can start and stop the spark
demons. But we cannot get the status of the daemons. It will be nice t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5327#issuecomment-88769600
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r27635035
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apach
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r27634876
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JoinSuite.scala ---
@@ -75,9 +76,9 @@ class JoinSuite extends QueryTest with BeforeAndAfterEach
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5326#issuecomment-88762001
[Test build #29591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29591/consoleFull)
for PR 5326 at commit
[`b4cbabd`](https://githu
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r27634669
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -144,6 +145,12 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable {
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5326
[SPARK-3862] [SQL] [WIP] MultiWayBroadcastJoin for LeftSemi & Inner JOIN
Assume we have table `x`, `y`, `z`, and the `x` is the fact table with
large mount of data, and `y`, `z` are dimension
Github user tsudukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5227#issuecomment-88761331
Ah @vanzin, I didn't understand your suggestion. `CommandBuilderUtils`
needs modified to escape comma.
But I think we still need to modify `spark-class2.cmd` as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5227#issuecomment-88759471
[Test build #29590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29590/consoleFull)
for PR 5227 at commit
[`0d4dc41`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5324#issuecomment-88759230
[Test build #29589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29589/consoleFull)
for PR 5324 at commit
[`7977c2f`](https://githu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5320
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5320#issuecomment-88758764
Thanks. Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5297#issuecomment-88756937
[Test build #29588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29588/consoleFull)
for PR 5297 at commit
[`f0bc54f`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88752957
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88752937
[Test build #29585 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29585/consoleFull)
for PR 5286 at commit
[`c71fbc7`](https://gith
Github user Sephiroth-Lin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5305#issuecomment-88752700
Jenkins, retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5325#issuecomment-88750778
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5320#issuecomment-88750863
[Test build #633 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/633/consoleFull)
for PR 5320 at commit
[`1667604`](https://githu
GitHub user colinmjj opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5325
spark-6106:Support user group mapping and groups in view, modify and admin
acls
Add following configuration:
spark.security.group.acls.enable: true|false to enable/disable
group acl c
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5324#issuecomment-88746568
After testing for a while, it seems that the retry does not work, but the
timeout on client side can help:
```
15/04/01 22:42:14 WARN PythonRDD: Timed out after 4 s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5324#issuecomment-88739450
[Test build #29587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29587/consoleFull)
for PR 5324 at commit
[`b838f35`](https://githu
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5324
[SPARK-6667] [PySpark] retry after timeout to accept
This is a small chance that the socket server will timed out after 3
seconds, but client had connected to it, then the Python process will hang.
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5324#issuecomment-88738373
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-88735424
cc @marmbrus @liancheng @yhuai @chenghao-intel
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5303#issuecomment-88734217
[Test build #29586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29586/consoleFull)
for PR 5303 at commit
[`9dc32d1`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-88733710
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-88733696
[Test build #29583 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29583/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`e85e9aa`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-88732886
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-88732869
[Test build #29584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29584/consoleFull)
for PR 5208 at commit
[`7a869c5`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5316#issuecomment-88732387
Thanks! I've merged this to master and branch-1.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5316
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3247#issuecomment-88730386
@maropu Glad to know you're interested with the refactoring!
Ideally, we'd better create a branch for a big code change, and then we can
break down the task in
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-88730450
@jkbradley, thank you for your quick replying. I understand you are waiting
for @freeman-lab 's review. I am making an example and writing the
documentation in parallel n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88729705
[Test build #29585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29585/consoleFull)
for PR 5286 at commit
[`c71fbc7`](https://githu
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#discussion_r27632117
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/HierarchicalClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,610 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#discussion_r27632107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/HierarchicalClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,610 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88728689
/cc @brennonyork - this is giving me strange dependency messages even
though the patch doesn't touch any pom files.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88728572
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5320#issuecomment-88725778
[Test build #633 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/633/consoleFull)
for PR 5320 at commit
[`1667604`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5316#issuecomment-88723687
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5316#issuecomment-88723655
[Test build #29582 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29582/consoleFull)
for PR 5316 at commit
[`53b627a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5266#issuecomment-88721458
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5266#issuecomment-88721453
[Test build #29581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29581/consoleFull)
for PR 5266 at commit
[`03fbecb`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5297#issuecomment-88717858
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5297#issuecomment-88717855
[Test build #29580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29580/consoleFull)
for PR 5297 at commit
[`ba9b22b`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-88712992
[Test build #29584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29584/consoleFull)
for PR 5208 at commit
[`7a869c5`](https://githu
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3247#issuecomment-88711084
@chenghao-intel I'm also with your refactoring idea though, it's too big to
merge into the master in bulk.
ISTM this patch is better to split into some small ones.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-88709309
[Test build #29583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29583/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`e85e9aa`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5316#issuecomment-88708875
[Test build #29582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29582/consoleFull)
for PR 5316 at commit
[`53b627a`](https://githu
Github user Sephiroth-Lin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5294#issuecomment-88708773
@tgravescs @srowen @sryza As i have retest again, if we don't populate
hadoop classpath, then in all case it dosen't work. This PR cann't solve this
issue, i will c
Github user Sephiroth-Lin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5294
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user chetmancini commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5316#issuecomment-88708808
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5323#issuecomment-88708786
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5266#discussion_r27629781
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/IDF.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) un
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5266#issuecomment-88708429
[Test build #29581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29581/consoleFull)
for PR 5266 at commit
[`03fbecb`](https://githu
GitHub user wangzhonnew opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5323
[SPARK-6639]Create a new script to start multiple masters
start-slaves.sh script is able to read from slaves file and start slaves
node in multiple boxes.
However in standalone mode if I wan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88705534
**[Test build #632 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/632/consoleFull)**
for PR 5318 at commit
[`0f66ec2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5320#issuecomment-88703996
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4735#discussion_r27628773
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LabelIndexer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5297#issuecomment-88700590
[Test build #29580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29580/consoleFull)
for PR 5297 at commit
[`ba9b22b`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5322#issuecomment-88700805
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5322#issuecomment-88700765
[Test build #29579 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29579/consoleFull)
for PR 5322 at commit
[`351c9f3`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5306#discussion_r27628404
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiver.scala ---
@@ -71,12 +75,22 @@ private[spark] class HeartbeatReceiver(sc:
SparkContext, schedu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5319
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5319#issuecomment-88684054
Merging in 1.3 and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88682995
Merged into master. The failed test is an unrelated yarn test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5319#issuecomment-88682365
LGTM too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5319#issuecomment-88680357
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5319#issuecomment-88680354
[Test build #29574 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29574/consoleFull)
for PR 5319 at commit
[`7c62a64`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5315#issuecomment-88679205
[Test build #29572 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29572/consoleFull)
for PR 5315 at commit
[`c29e03b`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5322#issuecomment-88679219
[Test build #29579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29579/consoleFull)
for PR 5322 at commit
[`351c9f3`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5315#issuecomment-88679212
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5322
[SQL] Lock metastore client in analyzeTable
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark lockAnalyze
Alternatively you can r
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88676039
[Test build #29575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29575/consoleFull)
for PR 5318 at commit
[`0f66ec2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88676050
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88675476
[Test build #632 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/632/consoleFull)
for PR 5318 at commit
[`0f66ec2`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88674477
[Test build #29573 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29573/consoleFull)
for PR 5318 at commit
[`ad8c42f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5318#issuecomment-88674482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88674434
[Test build #29576 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29576/consoleFull)
for PR 5286 at commit
[`f36edd5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5286#issuecomment-88674441
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4735#discussion_r27625124
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LabelIndexer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5206
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5320#issuecomment-88673311
[Test build #29578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29578/consoleFull)
for PR 5320 at commit
[`1667604`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5206#issuecomment-88673324
LGTM, so I'm going to merge this into `master` (1.4.0) and `branch-1.3`
(1.3.1). Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
1 - 100 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
