Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5449#discussion_r28217902
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -119,7 +131,27 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
def getN
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4996#issuecomment-92237049
[Test build #30152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30152/consoleFull)
for PR 4996 at commit
[`621c12f`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5290#issuecomment-92237025
[Test build #30151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30151/consoleFull)
for PR 5290 at commit
[`36c8126`](https://githu
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5290#discussion_r28217715
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +381,33 @@ class Analyzer(catalog: Catalog,
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4996#issuecomment-92235526
After doing more search, I just found that because `Average` is a
`PartialAggregate`, we never get a `Average` node when reaching
`HashAggregation` to prepare `GeneratedAg
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5477#issuecomment-92235067
This LGTM as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3438#issuecomment-92231763
[Test build #30143 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30143/consoleFull)
for PR 3438 at commit
[`d6c94da`](https://gith
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5450#discussion_r28217008
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -38,7 +43,63 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.random.X
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3438#issuecomment-92231768
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92231474
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92231465
[Test build #30142 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30142/consoleFull)
for PR 5330 at commit
[`32d409d`](https://gith
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5290#discussion_r28216699
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -36,6 +36,58 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
BeforeAndAfterA
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5290#discussion_r28216651
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +381,33 @@ class Analyzer(catalog: Catalog,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#issuecomment-92230105
[Test build #30150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30150/consoleFull)
for PR 5431 at commit
[`eec2264`](https://githu
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5450#discussion_r28216481
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -38,7 +43,63 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.random.XOR
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5450#discussion_r28216448
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -38,7 +43,63 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.random.XOR
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92228720
[Test build #30149 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30149/consoleFull)
for PR 5486 at commit
[`01683de`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92228230
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92228246
[Test build #30148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30148/consoleFull)
for PR 5486 at commit
[`01683de`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92227423
[Test build #30146 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30146/consoleFull)
for PR 5486 at commit
[`22014fc`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92227425
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92227327
[Test build #30146 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30146/consoleFull)
for PR 5486 at commit
[`22014fc`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3794#issuecomment-92227329
[Test build #30147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30147/consoleFull)
for PR 3794 at commit
[`d5c0e84`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92226907
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92225897
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5282
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5282#issuecomment-92225485
I'm going to merge this now. The resolve thing needs a broader (df-wide)
discussion. That should happen but outside of this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5282#issuecomment-92225181
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5282#issuecomment-92225177
[Test build #30141 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30141/consoleFull)
for PR 5282 at commit
[`4b72434`](https://gith
Github user twinkle-sachdeva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5449#discussion_r28215620
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -94,6 +98,14 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
// Ad
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92224717
[Test build #30140 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30140/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92224747
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user twinkle-sachdeva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5449#discussion_r28215570
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -119,7 +131,27 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5480#issuecomment-92223415
[Test build #30145 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30145/consoleFull)
for PR 5480 at commit
[`0edf568`](https://githu
Github user twinkle-sachdeva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5449#discussion_r28215509
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5196#issuecomment-92220404
Merged into master. Will send a follow-up PR to handle attributes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5196
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4735
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4735#issuecomment-92220115
Merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3000
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92219187
[Test build #30139 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30139/consoleFull)
for PR 5486 at commit
[`5060e6b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92219235
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3000#issuecomment-92219015
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks, and sorry for the long delay!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-92215817
The change LGTM but I'll leave it to @pwendell to OK the pom changes. I'm
not sure if there's a better way to express basically "don't include any of
this guy's transiti
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92215227
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92215221
[Test build #30138 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30138/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`bc04e05`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5310
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5310#issuecomment-92215175
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user saucam commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5298#discussion_r28214791
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -98,12 +98,32 @@ private[parquet] class RowReadSupport extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3438#issuecomment-92214906
[Test build #30143 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30143/consoleFull)
for PR 3438 at commit
[`d6c94da`](https://githu
Github user saucam commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5298#discussion_r28214717
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -98,12 +98,32 @@ private[parquet] class RowReadSupport extends
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92213809
@jkbradley I pushed an update to the same PR. I agree with the observation,
that it would have a much higher impact on evaluateEachIteration, because
during training, p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92213928
[Test build #30142 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30142/consoleFull)
for PR 5330 at commit
[`32d409d`](https://githu
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28214577
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -75,9 +78,15 @@ case class Generate(
outputRows
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92211060
[Test build #30137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30137/consoleFull)
for PR 5330 at commit
[`d542bb0`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92211097
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92209807
Never mind, figured out, it should not take much effort, working on an
update to this PR itself.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92205153
[Test build #30136 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30136/consoleFull)
for PR 5463 at commit
[`e632315`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92205170
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5485#issuecomment-92204896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5485#issuecomment-92204894
[Test build #30135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30135/consoleFull)
for PR 5485 at commit
[`6f731c2`](https://gith
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5484#discussion_r28213874
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializerSuite.scala ---
@@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ class KryoSerializerSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92204156
[Test build #30140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30140/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5282#issuecomment-92204146
[Test build #30141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30141/consoleFull)
for PR 5282 at commit
[`4b72434`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92201987
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92202025
It just doesn't fail when you wanted it to fail!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92198905
Thanks for the tests. I get the gist of what you mean.
I'd be happy to merge this PR and work on this as a future JIRA. If I have
any queries, I shall comment o
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486#issuecomment-92195623
[Test build #30139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30139/consoleFull)
for PR 5486 at commit
[`5060e6b`](https://githu
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5486
[SPARK-6765] Enable scalastyle on test code.
Turn scalastyle on for all test code. Most of the violations have been
resolved in my previous pull requests:
Core: https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5247#issuecomment-92191089
Hi @marmbrus,
first i think this change is not doing query planning because
1 query planning is to convert a logical plan to spark plan (correct me if
i misunderstan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-92189980
[Test build #30131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30131/consoleFull)
for PR 4506 at commit
[`b463f8a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-9219
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92189854
That is it, but I ran some timing tests locally and found essentially no
difference between the two implementations, like you reported. I think the
issue is the overhe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5484#issuecomment-92189397
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5484#discussion_r28213119
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializerSuite.scala ---
@@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ class KryoSerializerSuite extends FunSuite with
Shar
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5484#discussion_r28213105
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/StandaloneRestSubmitSuite.scala
---
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ private class DummyMaster(
exception
Github user DoingDone9 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4995#issuecomment-92189086
Could you tell me how you got this exception? I test with three nodes , and
it works again. Thank you @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-92188010
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-92187993
[Test build #30133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30133/consoleFull)
for PR 4506 at commit
[`0be05f7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-92187601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-92187592
[Test build #30132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30132/consoleFull)
for PR 4506 at commit
[`dd0b3f6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5479#issuecomment-92187267
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5479#issuecomment-92187233
[Test build #30129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30129/consoleFull)
for PR 5479 at commit
[`f775f93`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92186450
[Test build #30134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30134/consoleFull)
for PR 5463 at commit
[`15106ab`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92186454
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92186301
[Test build #30138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30138/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`bc04e05`](https://githu
Github user ilganeli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92185204
All changes pulled in - I think all parties should be happy now :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92184844
[Test build #30137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30137/consoleFull)
for PR 5330 at commit
[`d542bb0`](https://githu
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-92184482
@jkbradley fixed! hopefully that should be it :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28212679
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportConf.java
---
@@ -37,8 +37,11 @@ public boolean preferDirectBufs() {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92183786
[Test build #30136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30136/consoleFull)
for PR 5463 at commit
[`e632315`](https://githu
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28212643
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1011,6 +1014,30 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user ypcat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5042#issuecomment-92183165
@liancheng this DirectParquetOutputCommitter is based on
DirectOutputCommitter in this
[thread](https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-user/201502.mbox/%3ccangvg8q
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28212639
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -611,9 +613,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28212581
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiver.scala ---
@@ -62,14 +62,17 @@ private[spark] class HeartbeatReceiver(sc: SparkContext)
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28212575
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiver.scala ---
@@ -62,14 +62,17 @@ private[spark] class HeartbeatReceiver(sc: SparkContext)
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#discussion_r28212494
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -75,9 +78,15 @@ case class Generate(
outputRows
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92179758
[Test build #30130 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30130/consoleFull)
for PR 5463 at commit
[`29a22a9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5463#issuecomment-92179785
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
