Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#discussion_r29026826
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -96,9 +99,27 @@ class WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRD
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5676#issuecomment-95822131
This looks like a duplicate of SPARK-6954 (PR #5536)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-95821459
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-95821427
[Test build #30916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30916/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`d3c63c8`](https://gith
Github user aniketbhatnagar commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-95819955
+1 from my side. having a consistent httpclient version would be so much
better!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5680#issuecomment-95819308
[Test build #30920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30920/consoleFull)
for PR 5680 at commit
[`28d668f`](https://githu
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5680
[SPARK-7112][Streaming] Add a DirectStreamTracker to track the direct
streams
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jerryshao/apach
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-95817298
[Test build #30919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30919/consoleFull)
for PR 5668 at commit
[`b4651fd`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-95813823
[Test build #30918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30918/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`b09d0c5`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95811201
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95811180
[Test build #30914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30914/consoleFull)
for PR 5645 at commit
[`d7cd15b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5679#issuecomment-95810737
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user stevencanopy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5679
SPARK-7103: Fix crash with SparkContext.union when RDD has no partitioner
Added a check to the SparkContext.union method to check that a partitioner
is defined on all RDDs when instantiating a
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5245#issuecomment-95810160
@mengxr I do some tests on these two versions, here is the result log: (You
can see my code
[here](https://github.com/yinxusen/spark/blob/PerformanceTest-5894/mllib/src/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5604#issuecomment-95809888
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5604#issuecomment-95809882
[Test build #30917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30917/consoleFull)
for PR 5604 at commit
[`5b96e2a`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5604#issuecomment-95809470
[Test build #30917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30917/consoleFull)
for PR 5604 at commit
[`5b96e2a`](https://githu
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#issuecomment-95806853
LGTM except some minor inline comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024766
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/GBTExample.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024771
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressor.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024769
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifier.scala
---
@@ -85,18 +82,16 @@ final class DecisionTreeClassifier
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024757
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/JavaGBTClassifierSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024748
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/impl/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -296,5 +299,194 @@ private[ml] trait TreeRegressorParams extends Params {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024762
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024737
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024743
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95806380
[Test build #30913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30913/consoleFull)
for PR 5645 at commit
[`1a32a4b`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024756
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/JavaGBTClassifierSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024746
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/impl/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -296,5 +299,194 @@ private[ml] trait TreeRegressorParams extends Params {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95806388
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024741
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5675#discussion_r29024715
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
@@ -40,32 +40,46 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
*/
@Develop
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#discussion_r29024688
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/AllJobsPage.scala ---
@@ -17,17 +17,172 @@
package org.apache.spark.ui.jobs
-import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5677#issuecomment-95805563
[Test build #30911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30911/consoleFull)
for PR 5677 at commit
[`ebadaa9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5677#issuecomment-95805571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5675#discussion_r29024422
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
@@ -40,32 +40,46 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
*/
@De
GitHub user vinodkc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5678
[SPARK-7103][Spark Core]Verify patitionors are available in all RDDs used
in PartitionerAwareUnionRDD
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5678#issuecomment-95805275
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5647#issuecomment-95805052
[Test build #30912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30912/consoleFull)
for PR 5647 at commit
[`9903837`](https://gith
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4474#issuecomment-95805067
I'd be happy to have a patch that kills the JVM when this occurs, with a
warning message logged. I didn't realize in your original submission that this
was actually just
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5647#issuecomment-95805062
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5643#discussion_r29024298
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastLeftSemiJoinHash.scala
---
@@ -32,36 +32,69 @@ case class BroadcastLef
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5665#issuecomment-95804784
`newPredicate(condition.getOrElse(Literal(true)), left.output ++
right.output)`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#discussion_r29024275
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/AllJobsPage.scala ---
@@ -17,17 +17,172 @@
package org.apache.spark.ui.jobs
-impor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5637#issuecomment-95804369
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5637#issuecomment-95804360
[Test build #30906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30906/consoleFull)
for PR 5637 at commit
[`ab38c71`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-95803737
[Test build #30916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30916/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`d3c63c8`](https://githu
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5626#discussion_r29024038
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5643#issuecomment-95800072
[Test build #30905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30905/consoleFull)
for PR 5643 at commit
[`d29f9a6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5643#issuecomment-95800074
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5613#issuecomment-95799955
[Test build #30907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30907/consoleFull)
for PR 5613 at commit
[`abaf02e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5613#issuecomment-95799978
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4015#issuecomment-95799659
@marmbrus Any more comment on this before merging? It will be great
appreciated if you merge this soon, as I did take lots of time in rebase again
and again. :)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-95799433
[Test build #30915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30915/consoleFull)
for PR 5354 at commit
[`0eefe4d`](https://githu
Github user calvinjia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-95799161
@srowen
I appreciate the feedback, and I've cleaned up the httpclient versions as
you suggested.
Do you have any other comments? Thanks.
---
If your project
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5671
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5671#issuecomment-95798871
Thank you @rxin, closing since it's merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95798479
[Test build #30909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30909/consoleFull)
for PR 5645 at commit
[`e0d19fb`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95798495
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95798520
[Test build #30914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30914/consoleFull)
for PR 5645 at commit
[`d7cd15b`](https://githu
Github user phatak-dev commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5654#issuecomment-95798250
Added for other methods also.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95798234
[Test build #30913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30913/consoleFull)
for PR 5645 at commit
[`1a32a4b`](https://githu
Github user tsudukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5227#issuecomment-95798208
I was checking about the `SparkLauncherSuite` on Windows as vanzin's
comment, and faced some trouble. It seems not to related with this PR, but I'm
not sure yet. Please
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5676#issuecomment-95797914
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user shroffpradyumn commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5547#issuecomment-95797940
Thank you all for your feedback, and I apologize for my late reply (itâs
been a rough week of midterms).
@pwendell - Iâve addressed all your inline com
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5676#issuecomment-95797907
[Test build #30908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30908/consoleFull)
for PR 5676 at commit
[`1693b54`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5675
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667#issuecomment-95797532
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667#issuecomment-95797525
[Test build #30903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30903/consoleFull)
for PR 5667 at commit
[`9d2295e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5675#issuecomment-95797394
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5675#issuecomment-95797389
[Test build #30902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30902/consoleFull)
for PR 5675 at commit
[`0f31856`](https://gith
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5662#discussion_r29022546
--- Diff:
repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/SparkIMain.scala ---
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ class SparkIMain(@BeanProperty val factory:
Scri
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5665#issuecomment-95792030
/cc @rxin @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5647#issuecomment-95791867
[Test build #30912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30912/consoleFull)
for PR 5647 at commit
[`9903837`](https://githu
Github user FlytxtRnD commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5647#issuecomment-95791587
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5671#issuecomment-95791377
Can you close the PR? Since it was not merged into master, github won't
close this automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5674
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5674#issuecomment-95791355
Thanks. I've merged this in master & branch-1.3.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5677#issuecomment-95790916
[Test build #30911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30911/consoleFull)
for PR 5677 at commit
[`ebadaa9`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5628#issuecomment-95789973
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5677#issuecomment-95789809
i will try to add a test case for this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5628#issuecomment-95789945
[Test build #30899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30899/consoleFull)
for PR 5628 at commit
[`046bc9e`](https://gith
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5677
[SPARK-7109] [SQL] Push down left side filter for left semi join
Now in spark sql optimizer we only push down right side filter for left
semi join, actually we can push down left side filter.
You can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5547#issuecomment-95789435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5547#issuecomment-95789429
[Test build #30910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30910/consoleFull)
for PR 5547 at commit
[`5c3a2a6`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5547#issuecomment-95789315
[Test build #30910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30910/consoleFull)
for PR 5547 at commit
[`5c3a2a6`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5663#issuecomment-95789182
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5663#issuecomment-95789176
[Test build #30898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30898/consoleFull)
for PR 5663 at commit
[`cf80049`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5542#issuecomment-95788877
[Test build #30901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30901/consoleFull)
for PR 5542 at commit
[`71f1bd5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5542#issuecomment-9573
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#issuecomment-95788717
[Test build #30909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30909/consoleFull)
for PR 5645 at commit
[`e0d19fb`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5676#issuecomment-95787694
[Test build #30908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30908/consoleFull)
for PR 5676 at commit
[`1693b54`](https://githu
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5609#issuecomment-95787561
BTW I have tested on my cluster with setting
>export SPARK_DAEMON_MEMORY=m
export SPARK_DAEMON_JAVA_OPTS=" -Dx=y "
in spark-env.sh.
Before
GitHub user ArcherShao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5676
[SPARK-6891] Fix the bug that ExecutorAllocationManager will request
negative number executors
In ExecutorAllocationManager, executor allocate schedule at a fix
rate(100ms), it will call the met
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5613#issuecomment-95786756
[Test build #30907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30907/consoleFull)
for PR 5613 at commit
[`abaf02e`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5637#issuecomment-95786710
[Test build #30906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30906/consoleFull)
for PR 5637 at commit
[`ab38c71`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4015#issuecomment-95786382
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4015#issuecomment-95786341
[Test build #30897 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30897/consoleFull)
for PR 4015 at commit
[`81a731f`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5671#issuecomment-95785614
Thanks. I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zhzhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5637#issuecomment-95784598
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 647 matches
Mail list logo
