Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102290820
[Test build #32791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32791/consoleFull)
for PR 6081 at commit
[`617da76`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6176#discussion_r30388717
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/io/CompressionCodec.scala ---
@@ -154,8 +154,53 @@ class SnappyCompressionCodec(conf: SparkConf) extends
Compressi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102290810
[Test build #32790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32790/consoleFull)
for PR 6169 at commit
[`f559226`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102290516
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102290494
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102290515
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102290502
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6176#issuecomment-102290375
@JoshRosen does it make sense to re-enable those flakey tests in this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102290220
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102289632
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6160
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6176#issuecomment-102289609
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102289558
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102289633
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388533
--- Diff:
external/twitter/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/twitter/TwitterUtils.scala
---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ object TwitterUtils {
twitterAu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6081#issuecomment-102289602
[Test build #32775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32775/consoleFull)
for PR 6081 at commit
[`617da76`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102289611
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6176#issuecomment-102289548
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6163
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6160#issuecomment-102289203
Master 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388493
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -111,6 +112,50 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
/* Set
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388453
--- Diff:
external/twitter/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/twitter/TwitterUtils.scala
---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ object TwitterUtils {
twitterAu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102287622
[Test build #32787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32787/consoleFull)
for PR 6175 at commit
[`27b4b88`](https://gith
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6176
[SPARK-7660] Wrap SnappyOutputStream to work around snappy-java bug
This patch wraps `SnappyOutputStream` to ensure that `close()` is
idempotent and to guard against write-after-`close()` bugs. Th
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388400
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -338,6 +370,48 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
}
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6176#issuecomment-102287325
/cc @rxin @pwendell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388389
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDOperationScope.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +87,25 @@ private[spark] object RDDOperationScope {
/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102287085
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102287016
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388347
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/InputDStream.scala
---
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ abstract class InputDStream[T: ClassTag] (@
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102286749
Hi @chenghao-intel , as far as I know, we can only instantiate leaf
expressions which are all case classes. So probably we can design the
`semanticEquals` as how case
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102286704
[Test build #32786 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32786/consoleFull)
for PR 6169 at commit
[`a8054c3`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102286711
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388323
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -111,6 +112,50 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102286707
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6166#issuecomment-102286551
[Test build #32784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32784/consoleFull)
for PR 6166 at commit
[`402e8e4`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102286456
[Test build #32786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32786/consoleFull)
for PR 6169 at commit
[`a8054c3`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102286472
[Test build #32785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32785/consoleFull)
for PR 6173 at commit
[`cc02045`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102285819
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102285753
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6166#issuecomment-102285764
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6166#issuecomment-102285818
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102285758
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102285817
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6139#issuecomment-102285223
That test failure looks kind of valid. I'll look into it...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30388035
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -302,35 +347,22 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
//
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5988#issuecomment-102284514
[Test build #807 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/807/consoleFull)
for PR 5988 at commit
[`37459e1`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102284229
[Test build #32783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32783/consoleFull)
for PR 6175 at commit
[`d8f2444`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6115#issuecomment-102284174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6115#issuecomment-102284136
[Test build #32774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32774/consoleFull)
for PR 6115 at commit
[`87ad3c7`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6115#issuecomment-102284176
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102284091
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175#issuecomment-102284026
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387987
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -111,6 +112,50 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
/* Set
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387910
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <: NewInputF
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6175
[SPARK-7654][SQL] DataFrameReader and DataFrameWriter for input/output API
TODO:
- Documentation update
- Move JDBC into reader / writer?
- Move the generic load interface into reader.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387808
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/InputDStream.scala
---
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ abstract class InputDStream[T: ClassTag] (@transi
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387684
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -338,6 +370,48 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
}
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5395#issuecomment-102276959
@marmbrus Made a mistake to close this pr, so may I make a new pr because I
can't re-open it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6171#issuecomment-102276660
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6171#issuecomment-102276655
[Test build #32773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32773/consoleFull)
for PR 6171 at commit
[`b928cd4`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6171#issuecomment-102276662
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#discussion_r30387349
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,12 @@ abstract class Expression exte
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#discussion_r30387287
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,12 @@ abstract class Expression exte
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102276310
[Test build #32782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32782/consoleFull)
for PR 6174 at commit
[`cf1475a`](https://gith
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387251
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDOperationScope.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +87,25 @@ private[spark] object RDDOperationScope {
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102276122
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102276185
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387164
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDOperationScope.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +87,25 @@ private[spark] object RDDOperationScope {
/**
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#discussion_r30387122
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +105,18 @@ trait CheckAnalysis {
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30387131
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDOperationScope.scala
---
@@ -43,10 +43,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.SparkContext
@JsonPropertyOrder(Ar
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6150#issuecomment-102274611
[Test build #32781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32781/consoleFull)
for PR 6150 at commit
[`37d1738`](https://gith
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6166#issuecomment-102274593
Looks like this can be fixed using `NodeReport` which was available in
Hadoop 2.2. Testing it right now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6172#issuecomment-102274461
[Test build #32780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32780/consoleFull)
for PR 6172 at commit
[`3bfbbde`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6172#issuecomment-102273883
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6172#issuecomment-102274004
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6171#issuecomment-102274457
Testing your PR. Let's see if there is any memory leak tomorrow morning.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5395
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6150#issuecomment-102274075
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6150#issuecomment-102273962
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#discussion_r30387026
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +105,18 @@ trait CheckAnalysis {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102272440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102272443
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102272428
[Test build #32778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32778/consoleFull)
for PR 6174 at commit
[`6541ec4`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102272309
[Test build #32779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32779/consoleFull)
for PR 6173 at commit
[`d7ff8f4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102271340
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102271388
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102271634
[Test build #32778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32778/consoleFull)
for PR 6174 at commit
[`6541ec4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102271389
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174#issuecomment-102271333
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6170#issuecomment-102270852
[Test build #32772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32772/consoleFull)
for PR 6170 at commit
[`07aa72e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6170#issuecomment-102270890
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6170#issuecomment-102270892
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173#issuecomment-102270319
cc @chenghao-intel @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-102270390
@pwendell It's discussed here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6174
[SQL] [Minor] added check analysis rule for union node
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/scwf/spark union
Alternatively you can revi
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6173
[SPARK-7269] [SQL] Incorrect analysis for aggregation(use semanticEquals)
A modified version of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6110, use
`semanticEquals` to make it more efficient.
You can
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102269795
Yes, actually this PR is try to add the missing columns before we extract
window expressions and add `window` node. i will have a try on this way, if we
can not handle it
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6172#issuecomment-102269218
[Test build #32777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32777/consoleFull)
for PR 6172 at commit
[`5e5b2e3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6172#issuecomment-102268909
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 959 matches
Mail list logo
