Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#discussion_r30461540
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFilters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102647157
[Test build #32907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32907/consoleFull)
for PR 6194 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102647163
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102647161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102632583
[Test build #32907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32907/consoleFull)
for PR 6194 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#discussion_r30461430
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFilters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#discussion_r30461401
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -143,6 +145,9 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6113#issuecomment-102640597
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6113#issuecomment-102640651
[Test build #32908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32908/consoleFull)
for PR 6113 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6113#issuecomment-102640587
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hardmettle commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-102664453
@BryanCutler Do I have the access to merge your PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#discussion_r30461455
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/package.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6167#issuecomment-102650620
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6167#issuecomment-102650693
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6167#issuecomment-102665298
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6167#issuecomment-102665291
[Test build #32909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32909/consoleFull)
for PR 6167 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6167#issuecomment-102665297
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user preeze commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5835#issuecomment-102666463
Awesome.
Thanks @andrewor14 and @srowen for being always available for discussions
and making valuable contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6139#issuecomment-102672021
Sure I'll give that a shot tomorrow :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6159#issuecomment-102689423
/cc @rxin for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102625321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102632505
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102632498
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nitin2goyal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6036
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user nitin2goyal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6037
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#discussion_r30461402
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/HadoopTypeConverter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#discussion_r30461406
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/package.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6189#issuecomment-102643964
Can we add it into `MimaExcludes`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#issuecomment-102630662
It's only a hunch so far, but I think that default containerization in
Mesos is deleting all files written by Spark executors (under `/tmp`) as soon
as the executor is
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#issuecomment-102633383
The code looks good. (But I didn't get a chance to try it yet..)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6113#issuecomment-102660254
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6113#issuecomment-102660247
[Test build #32908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32908/consoleFull)
for PR 6113 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6113#issuecomment-102660253
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102625324
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102625293
[Test build #32906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32906/consoleFull)
for PR 6212 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6167#issuecomment-102651614
[Test build #32909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32909/consoleFull)
for PR 6167 at commit
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#issuecomment-102620921
Ok, I could reproduce the failure. Indeed slaves miss the `/tmp/spark-*`
directories, investigating who's deleting them. Thanks for catching this!
---
If your project
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-102621463
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r30460692
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/RpcUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +46,24 @@ object RpcUtils {
}
/** Returns the default
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r30460694
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/RpcUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +46,24 @@ object RpcUtils {
}
/** Returns the default
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r30460729
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ private[spark] abstract class RpcEnv(conf: SparkConf) {
*
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r30460833
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/akka/AkkaRpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ private[spark] class AkkaRpcEnv private[akka] (
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r30460835
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/akka/AkkaRpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -293,9 +292,9 @@ private[akka] class AkkaRpcEndpointRef(
actorRef !
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102624108
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102624109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102624101
[Test build #32905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32905/consoleFull)
for PR 6212 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6212#issuecomment-102624311
Merged to master and branch-1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#discussion_r30466991
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -338,6 +369,41 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
}
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6006#issuecomment-102730578
HiveContext use derby as the metastore database defaultly which only
support single instance for one metastore path.
I think you need config the
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6214
[MINOR] [SQL] Removes an unreachable case clause
This case clause is already covered by the one above, and generates a
compilation warning.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6214#issuecomment-102732502
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6214#issuecomment-102732506
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6214#issuecomment-102732542
[Test build #32923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32923/consoleFull)
for PR 6214 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6214#issuecomment-102732607
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6144#issuecomment-102733070
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6034#issuecomment-102733021
[Test build #816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/816/consoleFull)
for PR 6034 at commit
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6169#issuecomment-102733045
the basic idea here is to ignore window expressions in ResolveSortReferences
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6145#issuecomment-102733059
/cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6144#issuecomment-102733068
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6144#issuecomment-102733078
[Test build #32924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32924/consoleFull)
for PR 6144 at commit
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3753#issuecomment-102733083
i am closing this in favor of #6914
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user scwf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3753
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195#issuecomment-102734781
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195#issuecomment-102734749
[Test build #32919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32919/consoleFull)
for PR 6195 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195#issuecomment-102734779
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195#issuecomment-102736520
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195#issuecomment-102736514
[Test build #32920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32920/consoleFull)
for PR 6195 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6195#issuecomment-102736521
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user shivaram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6215
[MINOR] Add 1.3, 1.3.1 to master branch EC2 scripts
cc @pwendell
P.S: I can't believe this was outdated all along ?
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102743175
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6215#issuecomment-102743539
[Test build #32925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32925/consoleFull)
for PR 6215 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6215#issuecomment-102743164
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6215#issuecomment-102743233
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102743234
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6012#issuecomment-102743939
@viirya Sorry for the late reply, I missed this PR while working on #6090.
This fix LGTM, could you please rebase this PR? Notice that
`fsBasedParquet.scala` was
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6194#issuecomment-102744323
[Test build #32926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32926/consoleFull)
for PR 6194 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467355
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -473,13 +473,16 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6145#issuecomment-102745639
Would you mind to add a test case for this? Otherwise LGTM, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6147#issuecomment-102746723
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6147#issuecomment-102746727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6147#issuecomment-102746693
[Test build #32922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32922/consoleFull)
for PR 6147 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6012#issuecomment-102747335
@liancheng updated. Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467388
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -500,6 +503,55 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6145#issuecomment-102747393
The added clause makes the code path safer, but for now I couldn't think of
a test case that makes the original code fail... I still tend to have this
though.
---
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467395
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -500,6 +503,55 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6012#issuecomment-102747381
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6012#issuecomment-102747386
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6012#issuecomment-102747431
[Test build #32927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32927/consoleFull)
for PR 6012 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6210#issuecomment-102747529
[Test build #32921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32921/consoleFull)
for PR 6210 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6210#issuecomment-102747530
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467442
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -500,6 +503,55 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467430
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -473,13 +473,16 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6145#issuecomment-102747517
yes, actually it is hard to give a test case for now, i met this issue on
my inner branch with a tpcds sql.
that sql is invalid on the master branch so i can not add a
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467448
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -500,6 +503,55 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6210#issuecomment-102747531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6209#discussion_r30467455
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -500,6 +503,55 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6210#issuecomment-102747578
I'm going to merge this in since I have more follow-up PRs on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
