Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107992268
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107992316
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107993019
[Test build #33993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33993/consoleFull)
for PR 6578 at commit
[`720d293`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107993015
[Test build #33992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33992/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
[`22703dd`](https://gith
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107993570
This failed a totally unrelated streaming test, so I think it's okay.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user nitin2goyal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5880#issuecomment-107994772
Sorry for not being clear in my first comment but I meant that for queries
like "select a,b,c from table where a=10" where table is cached as schemaRDD
(spark-1.2),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107994949
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-107994995
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-107994968
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107994988
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107995146
[Test build #33994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33994/consoleFull)
for PR 6555 at commit
[`c0ceea8`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-107995533
[Test build #33995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33995/consoleFull)
for PR 6360 at commit
[`220358b`](https://gith
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#discussion_r31537671
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -426,38 +422,40 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#discussion_r31537727
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -508,7 +507,7 @@ class Word2VecModel private[mllib] (
*/
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6572#issuecomment-107996927
With `maxIter=0`, `areaUnderROC` is 0.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107997181
Ok, last patch LGTM. I wonder if it's worth it to add KILLED to the
condition here:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deplo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-107997557
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-107997533
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6572
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107997452
Lgtm pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6572#issuecomment-107997600
Merged into master and branch-1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-107998131
[Test build #33996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33996/consoleFull)
for PR 5841 at commit
[`2821481`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6423#issuecomment-107998999
By the way, you don't need to squash your commits together, since our merge
script will now take care of it when we commit things. Leaving them separate
makes it easi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-107999296
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-107996878
Ok, last patch LGTM. I wonder if it's worth it to add `KILLED` to the
condition here:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/dep
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-107999369
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-107999889
[Test build #33997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33997/consoleFull)
for PR 5603 at commit
[`2a2f213`](https://gith
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2994#issuecomment-108002092
Great!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user massie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6423#issuecomment-108002390
Thanks for the tip. I'll make sure to leave the commits separate moving
forward.
I looked into the use of `Try` between the `BlockStoreShuffleFetcher` and
`Shuff
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-108002278
[Test build #33987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33987/consoleFull)
for PR 6499 at commit
[`eaace71`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-108002307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31540947
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferOutputStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31540997
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferOutputStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108005849
Jenkins, retest this pleaas.e
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541402
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541397
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541390
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaParamsSuite.java ---
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ public void testParams() {
testParams.setMyIntPara
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541382
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -345,6 +346,12 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541432
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/JavaStatisticsSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541405
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541385
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +101,9 @@ object Statistics {
*/
def corr(x: RDD[Double
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541392
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541375
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +186,7 @@ class DoubleParam(parent: String, name: String, doc:
String, isVa
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541414
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/JavaStreamingLogisticRegressionSuite.java
---
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* limitations under
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108006519
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108006498
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31541648
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ByteArrayChunkOutputStream.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +95,45 @@ class ByteArrayChunkOutputStream(chunkSize: Int
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108006503
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6584#discussion_r31541724
--- Diff: docs/mllib-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -282,8 +277,8 @@ public class SVMClassifier {
System.out.println("Area under ROC = " + auROC);
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108007032
[Test build #33998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33998/consoleFull)
for PR 6580 at commit
[`0d52b89`](https://gith
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108007247
@jkbradley fixed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108007496
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108007522
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108007641
[Test build #33999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33999/consoleFull)
for PR 5748 at commit
[`14ee596`](https://gith
Github user massie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6423#discussion_r31542306
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -290,22 +287,15 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108008248
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108008241
[Test build #33998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33998/consoleFull)
for PR 6580 at commit
[`0d52b89`](https://git
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2994#issuecomment-108008961
I will get around to this in a few days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6588#issuecomment-108009312
[Test build #33990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33990/consoleFull)
for PR 6588 at commit
[`2d85159`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6588#issuecomment-108009327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31543107
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferInputStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apach
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31543142
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferInputStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apach
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#discussion_r31543689
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/__init__.py ---
@@ -23,7 +23,14 @@
# MLlib currently needs NumPy 1.4+, so complain if lower
import numpy
-if
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31543772
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferHelper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-108012118
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108012121
[Test build #869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/869/consoleFull)
for PR 6580 at commit
[`0d52b89`](https://githu
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31543872
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/WrappedLargeByteBuffer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31544111
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/WrappedLargeByteBuffer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-108013062
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-108013087
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108013191
[Test build #869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/869/consoleFull)
for PR 6580 at commit
[`0d52b89`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-108013554
[Test build #34000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34000/consoleFull)
for PR 6538 at commit
[`20a2811`](https://gith
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589
[HOT-FIX] Add EvaluatedType back to RDG
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/87941ff8c49a6661f22c31aa7b84ac1fce768135
accidentally removed the EvaluatedType.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589#issuecomment-108014087
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589#issuecomment-108014117
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589#issuecomment-108014083
I tested locally. Will merge it to branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6581#issuecomment-108014214
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6581#issuecomment-108014407
Merging to master and branch-1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589#issuecomment-108014782
[Test build #34001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34001/consoleFull)
for PR 6589 at commit
[`618c2eb`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31545220
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ByteArrayChunkOutputStream.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +95,45 @@ class ByteArrayChunkOutputStream(chunkSize:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31545270
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ByteArrayChunkOutputStream.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +95,45 @@ class ByteArrayChunkOutputStream(chunkSize:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31545490
--- Diff:
network/common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferHelperSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Ap
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6581
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31545767
--- Diff:
network/common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferHelperSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Ap
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31546071
--- Diff:
network/common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferHelperSuite.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589#issuecomment-108020607
I have merged it into branch 1.4. I am closing it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-108020938
@pwendell but Python hasn't even run yet because it runs after the Scala
streaming tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590
[SPARK-8038] [SQL] [PYSPARK] fix Column.when() and otherwise()
Thanks @ogirardot, closes #6580
cc @rxin @JoshRosen
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6551#issuecomment-108021959
@cloud-fan and @chenghao-intel. Updated, Any more comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-108022324
[Test build #870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/870/consoleFull)
for PR 6578 at commit
[`720d293`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108022532
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#issuecomment-108022625
Hey, one idea for avoiding tests that write huge files: can we use a data
generator + streaming checksum function to be able to detect data corruption
without having t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108022561
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108022747
[Test build #34002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34002/consoleFull)
for PR 6590 at commit
[`c0f2069`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108023111
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108023097
[Test build #33992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33992/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
[`22703dd`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-108023314
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#discussion_r31547675
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/__init__.py ---
@@ -23,7 +23,14 @@
# MLlib currently needs NumPy 1.4+, so complain if lower
import numpy
-
201 - 300 of 906 matches
Mail list logo
