Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108064998
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#issuecomment-108065016
[Test build #34005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34005/consoleFull)
for PR 6562 at commit
[`c16821b`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108065053
[Test build #34013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34013/consoleFull)
for PR 6591 at commit
[`fae9c0c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-108065123
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108064953
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108064975
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108064944
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108065006
lol. sorry about the silly mistake.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#issuecomment-108065046
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ogirardot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-108064219
Can you add a test with a join please ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108064317
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108064311
[Test build #34012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34012/consoleFull)
for PR 6591 at commit
[`9f01d7e`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108063632
[Test build #34012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34012/consoleFull)
for PR 6591 at commit
[`9f01d7e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108063490
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108063445
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user ogirardot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-108063274
@rxin @marmbrus can you please review this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108062736
[Test build #34011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34011/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
[`893fb7e`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108062942
@MechCoder please test it on your local and watch the Jenkins error
message. For example,
In
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108062520
lol, nice touch @JoshRosen
(btw, its OK to use jenkins to run tests for me like this as long I dont'
go overboard, right?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108061864
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108061914
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108061216
I see, I misunderstood the comment '"MLlib requires NumPy 1.4+"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user harsha2010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108060699
@jkbradley yes it does much better now
Row(id=4, text=u'spark i j k', probability=DenseVector([0.248, 0.752]),
prediction=1.0)
Row(id=5, text=u'l m n', p
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6342#issuecomment-108060709
LGTM.
@mengxr Could you take a look at this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108060192
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108060118
[Test build #34003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34003/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
[`e89376c`](https://git
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108060181
@MechCoder Why it is `<=` instead of `<`? We do support numpy 1.4.x like
1.4.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#discussion_r31559102
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/__init__.py ---
@@ -23,7 +23,14 @@
# MLlib currently needs NumPy 1.4+, so complain if lower
import numpy
-if
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6576#discussion_r31558278
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/LogisticRegressionExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#issuecomment-108058452
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6479#issuecomment-108056298
[Test build #34010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34010/consoleFull)
for PR 6479 at commit
[`f37c8c3`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31558805
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -345,6 +346,12 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
}
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108056706
@harsha2010 Thanks! (Does it give the hoped-for predictions on the test
data now when you run it?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6576#issuecomment-108056478
Looks good other than those small comments. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6576#discussion_r31558270
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/LinearRegressionExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108056329
![hohollywoodbungalow4907imgsourcesunderconstruction](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/50748/7944291/9c0b3ad8-091e-11e5-9f3d-cc5b5c6e50f7.gif)
![ararea51
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6576#discussion_r31558267
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/LinearRegressionExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6479#issuecomment-108055732
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6479#issuecomment-108055798
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6386#issuecomment-108054234
@dbtsai : would it be reasonable to just run the tests in
databricks/spark-perf#72 instead of waiting on getting it merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6479#discussion_r31557675
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateProjection.scala
---
@@ -38,201 +42,191 @@ object GenerateProj
Github user ogirardot commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108052390
Thanks for taking over :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108050513
[Test build #34009 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34009/consoleFull)
for PR 6590 at commit
[`c0f2069`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108049709
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108049760
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108049445
[Test build #34007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34007/consoleFull)
for PR 6591 at commit
[`b5d8ec5`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108049450
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108048809
[Test build #34007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34007/consoleFull)
for PR 6591 at commit
[`b5d8ec5`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108048876
[Test build #34008 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34008/consoleFull)
for PR 6358 at commit
[`63efda2`](https://gith
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5792#discussion_r31555906
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -335,6 +337,53 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite extends FunSu
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5792#issuecomment-108048755
LGTM, just a few minor things.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-108048336
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108048107
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108047897
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108047946
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108047886
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591#issuecomment-108047919
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5792#discussion_r31555464
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -147,6 +148,86 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108047381
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6590#issuecomment-108047348
[Test build #34002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34002/consoleFull)
for PR 6590 at commit
[`c0f2069`](https://git
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5792#discussion_r31555285
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -335,6 +337,53 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite extends FunSu
Github user harsha2010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108046949
@jkbradley thanks, i have updated the cross validator with enough examples
now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#discussion_r31555361
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tests.py ---
@@ -818,6 +830,78 @@ def test_model_transform(self):
self.assertEqual(model.transform([1.0, 2.0, 3.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-108046460
[Test build #34006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34006/consoleFull)
for PR 6583 at commit
[`1aafabd`](https://gith
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5792#discussion_r31555227
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -335,6 +337,53 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite extends FunSu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-108046188
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6591
just for testing ...
don't look at this yet, just running some tests -- I'll update title /
description when its ready to look at.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-108046222
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5792#discussion_r31554863
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +221,67 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(conf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-108043870
**[Test build #33996 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33996/consoleFull)**
for PR 5841 at commit
[`2821481`](https://gi
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6504#issuecomment-108044100
@coderxiang One more comment: Could you please mention the phrases "Lasso"
and "Ridge Regression" in the spark.ml doc? E.g., say how to set
elasticNetParam to get Las
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-108043914
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#issuecomment-108040143
Except for the issue with needing more training examples, this looks good
to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-108039612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-108039565
**[Test build #33995 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33995/consoleFull)**
for PR 6360 at commit
[`220358b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#issuecomment-108038589
[Test build #34005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34005/consoleFull)
for PR 6562 at commit
[`c16821b`](https://gith
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6358#discussion_r31552943
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/cross_validator.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or mor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#issuecomment-108037911
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#issuecomment-108037814
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31552762
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/JavaStatisticsSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6567#discussion_r31552636
--- Diff: dev/create-release/create-release.sh ---
@@ -228,14 +228,14 @@ if [[ ! "$@" =~ --skip-package ]]; then
# We increment the Zinc port eac
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31552623
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31552366
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -345,6 +346,12 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
}
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6479#discussion_r31552213
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -36,14 +38,12 @@ class LongHashSet extends
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-108035561
LGTM. Merging this, in master and branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user coderxiang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6504#issuecomment-108035368
@dbtsai sounds good. Let me start the your Scala code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108034535
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108035114
[Test build #34004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34004/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
[`e35f0d4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108034579
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108029957
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108029940
[Test build #33999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33999/consoleFull)
for PR 5748 at commit
[`14ee596`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-108029729
[Test build #33997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33997/consoleFull)
for PR 5603 at commit
[`2a2f213`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-108029749
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5915#issuecomment-108029093
Uh oh, those tests won't work because of merge conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108028256
[Test build #34003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34003/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
[`e89376c`](https://gith
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108027679
done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5915#issuecomment-108027840
[Test build #871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/871/consoleFull)
for PR 5915 at commit
[`15d1015`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108027761
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-108027731
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
501 - 600 of 906 matches
Mail list logo