Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6586#issuecomment-107964601
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-107971214
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107973246
[Test build #33986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33986/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107973253
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-107973252
[Test build #33987 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33987/consoleFull)
for PR 6499 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107975466
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107975367
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6588#issuecomment-107978880
[Test build #33990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33990/consoleFull)
for PR 6588 at commit
Github user potix2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4269#issuecomment-107980205
ok, I understand it. I try to split run-tests and rebase this branch onto
master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6582#issuecomment-107909842
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6581#issuecomment-107926100
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6581#issuecomment-107926090
[Test build #33978 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33978/consoleFull)
for PR 6581 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6586#issuecomment-107965177
[Test build #33984 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33984/consoleFull)
for PR 6586 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6586#issuecomment-107966357
Not all JDKs are OpenJDK, but, I'm also not sure why this would be better?
we don't want to avoid a buffer necessarily?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-107970067
@freeman-lab @mengxr
Please give a first pass. I've update the PR with a couple of tests.
Also, Jenkins is showing me this error in Python 3 for the doctests.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107972614
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587
[SPARK-7269] [SQL] [WIP] Refactor the class AttributeReference
- The methods of `equals` and `hashCode` in case class `AttributeReference`
are quite confusing, as it doesn't work like normal
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107975007
[Test build #33988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33988/consoleFull)
for PR 6587 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107975015
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-107976657
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107979077
[Test build #33989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33989/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-107979002
Mind adding a regression test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107979109
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6588#issuecomment-107978434
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6577#issuecomment-107938951
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6577#issuecomment-107938938
[Test build #33980 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33980/consoleFull)
for PR 6577 at commit
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583
[SPARK-8014] [SQL] Avoid premature metadata discovery when writing a
HadoopFsRelation with a save mode other than Append
The current code references the schema of the DataFrame to be written
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-107941655
[Test build #33981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33981/consoleFull)
for PR 6583 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#discussion_r31517920
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -453,6 +456,20 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6584
[Spark-8043][MLlib][Doc] update NaiveBayes and SVM examples in doc
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8043
I found some issues during testing the save/load examples in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6584#issuecomment-107946714
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6584#issuecomment-107946696
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6584#issuecomment-107947127
[Test build #33982 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33982/consoleFull)
for PR 6584 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-107948021
[Test build #33983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33983/consoleFull)
for PR 6585 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-107938544
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6538#issuecomment-107938527
**[Test build #33979 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33979/consoleFull)**
for PR 6538 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-107947861
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-107940853
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#discussion_r31517707
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -322,19 +322,10 @@ private[sql] object ResolvedDataSource {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6583#issuecomment-107940921
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user dusenberrymw opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585
[SPARK-7969] [SQL] Added a DataFrame.drop function that accepts a Column
reference.
Added a `DataFrame.drop` function that accepts a `Column` reference rather
than a `String`, and added
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-107947845
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6584#issuecomment-107979668
[Test build #33982 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33982/consoleFull)
for PR 6584 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107990804
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107992231
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107992221
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107992268
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107992316
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107982925
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107982978
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6586#issuecomment-107986240
[Test build #33984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33984/consoleFull)
for PR 6586 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#discussion_r31533274
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -400,17 +400,13 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107993570
This failed a totally unrelated streaming test, so I think it's okay.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-107994995
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-107994968
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107994988
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107995146
[Test build #33994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33994/consoleFull)
for PR 6555 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107983944
[Test build #33991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33991/consoleFull)
for PR 6587 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6545#issuecomment-107985041
It makes sense that the issue might be from caching applications. I think
@tsudukim wasn't saying that spark.history.retainedApplications = 0 is a
permanent solution,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-107985428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6585#issuecomment-107985409
[Test build #33983 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33983/consoleFull)
for PR 6585 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6586#issuecomment-107986262
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107987624
[Test build #33991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33991/consoleFull)
for PR 6587 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6587#issuecomment-107987646
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107990627
jenkins test this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578#issuecomment-107993019
[Test build #33993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33993/consoleFull)
for PR 6578 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6579#issuecomment-107993015
[Test build #33992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33992/consoleFull)
for PR 6579 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6578
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6555#issuecomment-107994949
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nitin2goyal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5880#issuecomment-107994772
Sorry for not being clear in my first comment but I meant that for queries
like select a,b,c from table where a=10 where table is cached as schemaRDD
(spark-1.2),
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6360#issuecomment-107995533
[Test build #33995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33995/consoleFull)
for PR 6360 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6572#issuecomment-107996927
With `maxIter=0`, `areaUnderROC` is 0.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-107999369
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-107999889
[Test build #33997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33997/consoleFull)
for PR 5603 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108005849
Jenkins, retest this pleaas.e
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541402
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541397
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541390
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaParamsSuite.java ---
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ public void testParams() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541382
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -345,6 +346,12 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541432
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/JavaStatisticsSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541405
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541385
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +101,9 @@ object Statistics {
*/
def corr(x:
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108006498
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31541648
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ByteArrayChunkOutputStream.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +95,45 @@ class ByteArrayChunkOutputStream(chunkSize:
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2994#issuecomment-108008961
I will get around to this in a few days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31543107
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferInputStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31543142
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferInputStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#discussion_r31537727
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -508,7 +507,7 @@ class Word2VecModel private[mllib] (
*/
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5841#issuecomment-107996878
Ok, last patch LGTM. I wonder if it's worth it to add `KILLED` to the
condition here:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5603#issuecomment-107999296
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user massie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6423#issuecomment-108002390
Thanks for the tip. I'll make sure to leave the commits separate moving
forward.
I looked into the use of `Try` between the `BlockStoreShuffleFetcher` and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-108002278
[Test build #33987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33987/consoleFull)
for PR 6499 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6499#issuecomment-108002307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31540997
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferOutputStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31540947
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferOutputStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541392
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/param/JavaTestParams.java
---
@@ -72,15 +72,31 @@ public JavaTestParams setMyStringParam(String value) {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541375
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +186,7 @@ class DoubleParam(parent: String, name: String, doc:
String,
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6562#discussion_r31541414
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/JavaStreamingLogisticRegressionSuite.java
---
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* limitations under
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6580#issuecomment-108007032
[Test build #33998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33998/consoleFull)
for PR 6580 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5748#issuecomment-108007522
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
701 - 800 of 893 matches
Mail list logo
