Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-111793235
[Test build #34873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34873/console)
for PR 3636 at commit
[`8313ba2`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-111793290
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111791373
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111791362
[Test build #34872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34872/console)
for PR 6686 at commit
[`6aeb740`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111790522
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111790437
**[Test build #34867 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34867/console)**
for PR 6725 at commit
[`6089d11`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6807#issuecomment-111788118
[Test build #34876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34876/consoleFull)
for PR 6807 at commit
[`407c46c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6807#issuecomment-111788093
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6807#issuecomment-111788095
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6807#issuecomment-111788053
Looks like R is a little different from other modules because there's no
`src/main/resources`. I added `target` in front of the path. Let's see if this
works.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6606#issuecomment-111787404
[Test build #34875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34875/consoleFull)
for PR 6606 at commit
[`a5928bf`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6606#issuecomment-111787387
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6606#issuecomment-111787391
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-111787259
[Test build #913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/913/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`2f2e48c`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-111787249
[Test build #911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/911/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`2f2e48c`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-111787252
[Test build #912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/912/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`2f2e48c`](https://githu
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6726#issuecomment-111787217
@marmbrus @rxin I think this is ready to review, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32376753
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -131,24 +131,31 @@ public boolean contains(final UTF8String substring) {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32376747
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -131,24 +131,31 @@ public boolean contains(final UTF8String substring) {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32376728
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -131,24 +131,31 @@ public boolean contains(final UTF8String substring) {
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#issuecomment-111786937
@tarekauel Thanks for working on this, could you have some micro benchmark
to show the performance difference? It's good to see the improvements by
numbers.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-111785726
[Test build #34874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34874/consoleFull)
for PR 5694 at commit
[`ec1ae78`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-111785407
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-111785410
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-111785182
[Test build #34873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34873/consoleFull)
for PR 3636 at commit
[`8313ba2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-111785099
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-111785105
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-111785029
@jkbradley Sorry for late fixing. Can you check it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6797
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5358#discussion_r32376607
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/PruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -87,6 +87,27 @@ class PruningSuite extends HiveComparisonTes
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6797#issuecomment-111784944
[Test build #34868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34868/console)
for PR 6797 at commit
[`8a447b1`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6797#issuecomment-111784952
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5358#discussion_r32376603
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ case class Generate(
val boundGenerator = BindRe
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5358#discussion_r32376596
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -502,7 +502,11 @@ class FilterPushdownSuite e
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5358#discussion_r32376589
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +172,10 @@ object ColumnPruning extends Rule[Log
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111784090
[Test build #34872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34872/consoleFull)
for PR 6686 at commit
[`6aeb740`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111784043
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111784039
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6811#issuecomment-111783799
[Test build #34871 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34871/console)
for PR 6811 at commit
[`7cbb530`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6811#issuecomment-111783800
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6811#issuecomment-111783750
[Test build #34871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34871/consoleFull)
for PR 6811 at commit
[`7cbb530`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6811#issuecomment-111783725
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6811#issuecomment-111783722
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6811
[SPARK-8358][SQL] Wait for child resolution when resolving generators
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark aliasExplo
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#discussion_r32376385
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -255,3 +255,18 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right: Expr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111783685
[Test build #34870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34870/consoleFull)
for PR 6686 at commit
[`689e54d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111783629
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111783631
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111783111
**[Test build #34862 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34862/console)**
for PR 6725 at commit
[`db7dc38`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111783117
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#discussion_r32376356
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ def _():
'atan2': 'Returns the angle theta from the conversion of rectangular
coordina
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#discussion_r32376351
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -367,9 +378,54 @@ def __init__(self, fields):
>>> struct1 == struct2
False
"""
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111782720
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111782715
[Test build #34864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34864/console)
for PR 6696 at commit
[`f9616b9`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6726#issuecomment-111782666
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6726#issuecomment-111782665
[Test build #34865 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34865/console)
for PR 6726 at commit
[`73750ea`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111780568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111780478
[Test build #34863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34863/console)
for PR 6725 at commit
[`bc89597`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111780254
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111780252
[Test build #34869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34869/console)
for PR 6686 at commit
[`f497e9e`](https://github.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6801
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111780199
[Test build #34869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34869/consoleFull)
for PR 6686 at commit
[`f497e9e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111780178
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#discussion_r32376192
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -367,9 +378,54 @@ def __init__(self, fields):
>>> struct1 == struct2
False
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111780174
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6801#issuecomment-111780185
Thanks. I'm merging this in master & branch-1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#discussion_r32376189
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -349,13 +349,24 @@ def fromJson(cls, json):
json["metadata"])
+cl
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6792#issuecomment-111779858
Another nit:
```
[warn]
/home/michael/spark/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflectionSuite.scala:24:
imported `InternalRow'
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6797#issuecomment-111778945
[Test build #34868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34868/consoleFull)
for PR 6797 at commit
[`8a447b1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6797#issuecomment-111778601
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111778145
[Test build #34867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34867/consoleFull)
for PR 6725 at commit
[`6089d11`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111777972
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111777968
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#discussion_r32376023
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -349,13 +349,24 @@ def fromJson(cls, json):
json["metadata"])
+class
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-111777949
BTW you might want to remove the "WIP" tag in the pull request title now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#discussion_r32376017
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -367,9 +378,54 @@ def __init__(self, fields):
>>> struct1 == struct2
False
"""
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#issuecomment-111777894
cc @davies for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111777875
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111777873
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6810#issuecomment-111777483
I guess there's not a super easy way to add a regression test for this
since it's kind of hard to just instantiate the operator and run it with some
empty input.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6810#discussion_r32375944
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GeneratedAggregate.scala
---
@@ -270,7 +270,9 @@ case class GeneratedAggregate(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6809#issuecomment-111776515
[Test build #34861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34861/console)
for PR 6809 at commit
[`6520339`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6809#issuecomment-111776518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111776341
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111776334
[Test build #34860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34860/console)
for PR 6725 at commit
[`0634ef7`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6810#issuecomment-111776267
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user navis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6810
[SPARK-8357] [SQL] Memory leakage on unsafe aggregation path with empty
input
Currently, unsafe-based hash is released on 'next' call but if input is
empty, it would not be called ever.
You can mer
Github user navis commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111774230
@JoshRosen ok, sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6726#issuecomment-111774126
[Test build #34865 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34865/consoleFull)
for PR 6726 at commit
[`73750ea`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6726#issuecomment-111773878
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6726#issuecomment-111773882
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111772763
@navis, good catch on finding the memory leak in the unsafe aggregation
path. I think that maybe we should extract that bugfix into its own PR so that
it's easier to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111772546
[Test build #34864 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34864/consoleFull)
for PR 6696 at commit
[`f9616b9`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1839#discussion_r32375677
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/DropRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user navis commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111772515
The memory leakage caused the test fail was a existing bug in master
branch. Currently, unsafe-based hash is released on 'next' call but if input is
empty, it would not be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111772463
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6696#issuecomment-111772460
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#discussion_r32375635
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1084,6 +1084,22 @@ object functions {
def log(columnName: String): Column =
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#discussion_r32375632
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -90,18 +90,26 @@ abstract class UnaryMathExpression(f: Double
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6725#issuecomment-111771425
[Test build #34863 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/34863/consoleFull)
for PR 6725 at commit
[`bc89597`](https://gith
1 - 100 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
