Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32690229
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -125,30 +129,37 @@ public UTF8String substring(final int start, final
int un
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6854#issuecomment-112987424
@srowen Just commented on the JIRA. Let me know what you think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32690041
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -125,30 +129,37 @@ public UTF8String substring(final int start, final
i
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#issuecomment-112986615
A bunch of mostly small cleanups. That's all for now!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689874
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689869
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689854
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689867
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689872
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689862
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689859
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689880
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689870
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689875
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689865
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689873
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689857
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689849
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689852
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689861
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689868
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689850
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-112981135
Hi @jerryshao is this ready for review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112981099
[Test build #35066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35066/console)
for PR 6864 at commit
[`e5e92f3`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112981114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#issuecomment-112980823
@hhbyyh Sorry for the long delay around the release! I'll review this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#issuecomment-112980561
OK, that sounds good. Also, sorry about the long delay in commenting!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112979996
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112979975
[Test build #35063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35063/console)
for PR 6853 at commit
[`c8c382a`](https://github.
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112978856
I don't think a doc change caused a python test failure.
On Jun 17, 2015 5:27 PM, "UCB AMPLab" wrote:
> Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
>
> â
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865#issuecomment-112978374
[Test build #35067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35067/consoleFull)
for PR 6865 at commit
[`79845b1`](https://gith
Github user harsha2010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#issuecomment-112978405
@jkbradley , yes I agree... the pipeline needs to be more complex. The Hive
/ HDFS component is not covered much in SQL examples as far as I can see... but
you are ri
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865#issuecomment-112978032
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865#issuecomment-112978022
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6858#issuecomment-112977799
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user brennonyork opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865
[SPARK-7017][HOTFIX][Project Infra]: Refactor dev/run-tests into Python
Fixed minor nits from the [previous
PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694) and removed unnecessary doc
build code
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6858#issuecomment-11295
[Test build #35061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35061/console)
for PR 6858 at commit
[`d65744d`](https://github.
Github user brennonyork commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-112976517
Thanks for the PR merge @JoshRosen. I'll go ahead and make a hotfix branch
to capture the last few nits you have above!
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112975673
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112975573
[Test build #35059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35059/console)
for PR 6346 at commit
[`79d1ef5`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112974768
[Test build #35064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35064/console)
for PR 6278 at commit
[`7033c90`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112974785
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#discussion_r32684148
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ComplexPipelineExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#discussion_r32684165
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ComplexPipelineExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#discussion_r32684157
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ComplexPipelineExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#discussion_r32684152
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ComplexPipelineExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#discussion_r32684146
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ComplexPipelineExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#issuecomment-112974372
@harsha2010 I added a few comments, but for this example, my intention was
to have a complex chain of feature encoders (maybe using 6+ since the
SimpleTextClassificat
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#discussion_r32684159
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/ComplexPipelineExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973920
[Test build #35066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35066/consoleFull)
for PR 6864 at commit
[`e5e92f3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973514
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973535
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973573
Background and alternative solutions for this issue can be a little bit
complex. Will give a summary of offline discussion with @yhuai here later.
---
If your project
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864
[SPARK-8406] [SQL] Adding UUID to output file name to avoid accidental
overwriting
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/liancheng/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6788#issuecomment-112971247
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6788#issuecomment-112971221
[Test build #35060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35060/console)
for PR 6788 at commit
[`2875bf4`](https://github.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6844
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6844#issuecomment-112969894
Thanks, merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112969443
[Test build #35065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35065/console)
for PR 6863 at commit
[`bb4336b`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112969458
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6829#issuecomment-112969135
I think the assembly is a good idea. Though for that we will have to
1. publish the assembly JAR instead of package JAR. It will be cumbersome
to add additional flume-s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112967694
[Test build #35065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35065/consoleFull)
for PR 6863 at commit
[`bb4336b`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5643#issuecomment-112967276
Mind bringing this up to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112966905
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112966838
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863
[Streaming][Kafka][SPARK-8390] fix docs related to HasOffsetRanges
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/koeninger/spark-1 SPARK-839
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112963546
[Test build #35064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35064/consoleFull)
for PR 6278 at commit
[`7033c90`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112963368
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112963381
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112962475
Merging this in Spark 1.4 and master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112962440
@srowen We have been seeing some flakiness in this test in our daily master
builds in Jenkins. So these fixes LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6326#issuecomment-112961301
Sorry for the delay here. Mind bringing this up to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112961170
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112961128
[Test build #35057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35057/console)
for PR 6758 at commit
[`1292346`](https://github.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659#issuecomment-112960569
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112960343
[Test build #35063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35063/consoleFull)
for PR 6853 at commit
[`c8c382a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112959823
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112959854
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112958839
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112958798
If I understand correctly, you are just delaying the failure until
`checkAnalysis`. A few followup questions: does that mean you don't check
analysis in your code pat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112957441
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112957431
[Test build #35062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35062/console)
for PR 6796 at commit
[`8f6445c`](https://github.
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6146#issuecomment-112956949
Please explain your change. Neither the JIRA nor the PR description
describe why you the original code is incorrect.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112956321
[Test build #35062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35062/consoleFull)
for PR 6796 at commit
[`8f6445c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112955352
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112955333
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112954757
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659#issuecomment-112952353
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659#issuecomment-112952257
[Test build #35056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35056/console)
for PR 5659 at commit
[`cfa79f8`](https://github.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6817#discussion_r32675734
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -553,12 +562,13 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6456
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6826#discussion_r32674770
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -425,6 +425,11 @@ private[spark] object PythonRDD extends Logging {
i
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6456#issuecomment-112948921
Sorry slipped on this a little. I'm merging it into master now thanks Ryan!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6761#issuecomment-11294
@acidghost Thanks for the updated PR! I'll try to make a closer pass soon.
In the meantime, unit tests do sound great. I think one of the best ways to
test correctn
Github user hntd187 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-112948835
@avulanov How about I take the read and you take the write?
In an ideal world we should be able to take the implementation from here
https://github.com/h5py/h5p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6826
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6826#discussion_r32674187
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -425,6 +425,11 @@ private[spark] object PythonRDD extends Logging {
301 - 400 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
