Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6854#issuecomment-112721004
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6855#issuecomment-112720975
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6854#issuecomment-112721117
[Test build #35031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35031/consoleFull)
for PR 6854 at commit
[`2c8f925`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6855#issuecomment-112721005
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6854#issuecomment-112720982
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5984#issuecomment-112720408
[Test build #35029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35029/consoleFull)
for PR 5984 at commit
[`7f21ce9`](https://gith
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6855
[SPARK-8395] [DOCS] start-slave.sh docs incorrect
start-slave.sh no longer takes a worker # param in 1.4+
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://git
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6775#issuecomment-112719572
@rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6854
[SPARK-8335] [MLLIB] DecisionTreeModel.predict() return type not convenient
Make Java-friendly predict return a JavaRDD of java.lang.Double instead of
Scala Double, in the way ClassificationModel et
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5984#issuecomment-112718287
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5984#issuecomment-112718380
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6775#issuecomment-112717485
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6775#issuecomment-112717437
[Test build #35026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35026/console)
for PR 6775 at commit
[`282e958`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112716410
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user smola opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853
[SQL][SPARK-7088] Fix analysis for 3rd party logical plan.
ResolveReferences analysis rule now does not throw when it cannot resolve
references in a self-join.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user smola commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112716142
This is still a work in progress, since I have not tested yet.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6841#issuecomment-112715278
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6841#issuecomment-112715229
[Test build #35024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35024/console)
for PR 6841 at commit
[`2be2090`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-112714878
[Test build #35025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35025/console)
for PR 4887 at commit
[`f364f07`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-112714933
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-112713787
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5632#issuecomment-112713765
OK, then this should happen for flume-sink too? And update the titles here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-112713758
[Test build #35023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35023/console)
for PR 4887 at commit
[`26c4e86`](https://github.
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112712207
Yes I understand that argument, though have you observed a failure as a
result?
There are certainly some memory barriers in between the writes and reads
without this.
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112707759
> In all cases foreachRDD executes serially on the driver; what's the
thread safety issue?
The codes in foreachRDD run in `JobScheduler.jobExecutor`. But the che
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6822#discussion_r32603052
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -160,6 +161,42 @@ case class Expm1(child: Expression) ex
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6822#discussion_r32602793
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -160,6 +161,42 @@ case class Expm1(child: Expression) ex
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112705568
In all cases `foreachRDD` executes serially on the driver; what's the
thread safety issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6822#discussion_r32602667
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -160,6 +161,42 @@ case class Expm1(child: Expression) ex
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#discussion_r32602651
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/JavaDirectKafkaStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -116,7 +114,7 @@ public String call(MessageAndM
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112703034
[Test build #35028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35028/consoleFull)
for PR 6852 at commit
[`d464211`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112701815
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32602451
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class CreateStruct(children:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112701962
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112700126
cc @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852
[SPARK-8404][Streaming][Tests] Use thread-safe collections to make the
tests more reliable
KafkaStreamSuite, DirectKafkaStreamSuite, JavaKafkaStreamSuite and
JavaDirectKafkaStreamSuite use non-thre
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-112695568
Don't forget to implement the `def foldable`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#discussion_r32601604
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionals.scala
---
@@ -312,3 +312,63 @@ case class CaseKeyWhen(key
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#discussion_r32601495
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionals.scala
---
@@ -312,3 +312,63 @@ case class CaseKeyWhen(key
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-112694311
[Test build #35027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35027/consoleFull)
for PR 6851 at commit
[`3e25c6c`](https://gith
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112692973
`named_struct` is not implemented in Spark SQL right? At least, it should
be registered in `FunctionRegistry`. Of course we can leave it for the future.
---
If y
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-112692996
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-112692907
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#discussion_r32601187
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -134,4 +134,21 @@ class ConditionalExpre
Github user kevinpetersavage closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#discussion_r32601142
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/JavaDirectKafkaStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -89,6 +90,16 @@ public void testKafkaStream() t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6850#issuecomment-112692419
Actually never mind I'm going to push a commit to close this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32601130
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class CreateStruct(chil
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851
[SPARK-8203] [SPARK-8204] [WIP] [SQL] conditional function: least/greatest
@chenghao-intel @zhichao-li @qiansl127
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pul
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-112692322
@JoshRosen can you review this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5632#issuecomment-112692394
Hi @srowen , that's what I original meaning, move kafka-assembly into
scala-version folder.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user tellison closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6264
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6832#discussion_r32600697
--- Diff: dev/change-scala-version.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6832#discussion_r32600616
--- Diff: dev/change-scala-version.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5632#issuecomment-112687299
I think the destination of the assembly JARs has been overridden in Maven
because it needs to include the Scala version in order to not get those mixed
up easily, and sam
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32600352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def p
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#discussion_r32599952
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -62,9 +62,14 @@ case class CreateStruct(children:
701 - 758 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
