Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113690706
[Test build #942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/942/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`8e2d56f`](https://githu
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6672#discussion_r32880575
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -98,6 +99,9 @@ case class SparkListenerExecutorAdded(time: Long,
executorId:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113690652
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113690646
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6915#issuecomment-113690644
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6915#issuecomment-113690648
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113690514
Wait, oh, the title, please fix order :/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113690492
Merging this to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113690421
Can you provide the screenshot of the full UI so that we get sense of the
overall aesthetics?
Also @zsxwing what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for i
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6915
[SQL] [DO NOT MERGE] Use local[*] to launch TestSQLContext and TestHive.
This is just for test. Do not merge it.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113690424
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113690410
[Test build #35337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35337/console)
for PR 5717 at commit
[`211e101`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6897#issuecomment-113690268
[Test build #35342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35342/consoleFull)
for PR 6897 at commit
[`4bf26d6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113690235
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113690222
[Test build #35336 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35336/console)
for PR 6909 at commit
[`5e9d688`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6897#issuecomment-113690160
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6897#issuecomment-113690152
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6866#issuecomment-113690138
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6866#issuecomment-113690124
[Test build #35334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35334/console)
for PR 6866 at commit
[`a86a953`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914#issuecomment-113690081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914#issuecomment-113690075
[Test build #35341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35341/consoleFull)
for PR 6914 at commit
[`e6e15d6`](https://git
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#discussion_r32880332
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientWrapper.scala ---
@@ -136,12 +137,63 @@ private[hive] class ClientWrapper(
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6897#issuecomment-113689869
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910#issuecomment-113689433
Could you please make a separate JIRA and PR for bumping the version. These
are two completely different issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-113689106
@prabeesh Lets revive this PR.
@zsxwing Since you have already done the Flume Python API in #6830 , could
shepherd this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113688246
[Test build #35340 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35340/console)
for PR 6912 at commit
[`7c8ee16`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113688292
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910#issuecomment-113687421
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910#issuecomment-113687397
[Test build #35335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35335/console)
for PR 6910 at commit
[`ca35eb0`](https://github.
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-113687284
I have merged this to master and branch-1.4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914#issuecomment-113687273
[Test build #35341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35341/consoleFull)
for PR 6914 at commit
[`e6e15d6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914#issuecomment-113687114
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914#issuecomment-113687120
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113687010
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113687001
[Test build #35332 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35332/console)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`634b9f5`](https://github.
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914#issuecomment-113686986
@marmbrus This is the backport.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6914
[SPARK-8420] [SQL] Fix comparision of timestamps/dates with strings
(branch-1.4)
This is branch 1.4 backport of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888.
Below is the original description.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#issuecomment-113686436
@koeninger naah, not your fault, we backport stuff at the time of merging.
@srowen dont worry about it, i am cherry-picking this PR and #6863 to
branch 1.4
---
If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113686450
Merging it to master and branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#issuecomment-113686064
@srowen This was not committed to branch-1.4 even though the target version
of Spark 1.4.1 in the JIRA. Causing merge conflicts for other PR #6863 in
branch-1.4
Al
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#issuecomment-113685902
My original pr was against master
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Tathagata Das
wrote:
> Was this committed to branch-1.4?
>
> â
>
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6913
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6913#issuecomment-113685477
Merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6913#issuecomment-113685378
I am merging it to branch-1.4 to fix compilation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6913
[HOT-FIX] Fix compilation (caused by
0131142d98b191f6cc112d383aa10582a3ac35bf)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yhuai/spark branch
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#issuecomment-113685150
Was this committed to branch-1.4?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nishkamravi2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6607#discussion_r32879522
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -308,12 +336,25 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: Strea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113682475
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113682450
[Test build #35331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35331/console)
for PR 6632 at commit
[`321340d`](https://github.
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113680745
It does not merge cleanly with branch 1.4. Will have another pr for 1.4
backport.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113680070
[Test build #35339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35339/console)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`447dea0`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113680080
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113678839
[Test build #35340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35340/consoleFull)
for PR 6912 at commit
[`7c8ee16`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113677726
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113677840
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113676707
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113676455
[Test build #35329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35329/console)
for PR 6632 at commit
[`5a05d0f`](https://github.
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912
[SPARK-6749] [SQL] Make metastore client robust to underlying socket
connection loss
This works around a bug in the underlying RetryingMetaStoreClient
(HIVE-10384) by refreshing the metastore client
Github user ericl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6912#issuecomment-113676454
@yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113675867
[Test build #35339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35339/consoleFull)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`447dea0`](https://gith
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6888#issuecomment-113675079
Thanks! I am merging it to master and branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113674579
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113674573
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911
[SPARK-8492] [SQL] support binaryType in UnsafeRow
Support BinaryType in UnsafeRow, just like StringType.
Also change the layout of StringType and BinaryType in UnsafeRow, by
combining offse
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113674457
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6607#discussion_r32878507
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/SchedulerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674351
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674331
[Test build #35328 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35328/console)
for PR 6909 at commit
[`5e9d688`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113674309
[Test build #35327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35327/console)
for PR 6909 at commit
[`7ede573`](https://github.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6607#discussion_r32878356
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -308,12 +336,25 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: StreamingCont
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6877#discussion_r32878286
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ setMethod("isLocal",
setMethod("showDF",
signature(x = "DataFrame"),
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113673700
[Test build #941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/941/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`8e2d56f`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113673423
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113673416
[Test build #35338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35338/console)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`8e2d56f`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113670942
[Test build #35338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35338/consoleFull)
for PR 6759 at commit
[`8e2d56f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6883#issuecomment-113670872
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6883#issuecomment-113670853
[Test build #35333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35333/console)
for PR 6883 at commit
[`a5dd71c`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113670659
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6759#issuecomment-113670648
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113670505
[Test build #35322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35322/console)
for PR 6876 at commit
[`32d9811`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#issuecomment-113670534
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6799#issuecomment-113670396
Merged. I manually fixed a small conflict for 1.4 branch. Thanks
@NathanHowell !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113670244
[Test build #35337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35337/consoleFull)
for PR 5717 at commit
[`211e101`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113670190
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113670198
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6799#issuecomment-113669845
I am merging it to master and branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-113669761
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113669284
[Test build #35336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35336/consoleFull)
for PR 6909 at commit
[`5e9d688`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6799#issuecomment-113669186
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6799#issuecomment-113669113
[Test build #35324 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35324/console)
for PR 6799 at commit
[`76ac3e8`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113669127
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113669074
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6909#issuecomment-113668048
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user harishreedharan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6910#discussion_r32876281
--- Diff:
external/flume-sink/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/sink/SparkAvroCallbackHandler.scala
---
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ private[flume
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6889
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
101 - 200 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
