Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#issuecomment-117808024
@josepablocam In the PR description, please also include a summary of this
PR because it becomes part of the commit message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33718904
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -124,10 +124,16 @@ private[spark] class DiskBlockManager(blockManager:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117797061
[Test build #36282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36282/console)
for PR 7132 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#discussion_r33713764
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7162#issuecomment-117799843
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33715021
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1241,8 +1253,37 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117800789
[Test build #36295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36295/consoleFull)
for PR 7099 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117800747
[Test build #36294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36294/consoleFull)
for PR 7139 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7120#issuecomment-117801763
LGTM, so I'm going to merge this into master and branch-1.4. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7064#discussion_r33716204
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -119,6 +120,14 @@ final class EMLDAOptimizer extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7140
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#issuecomment-117805703
[Test build #36298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36298/consoleFull)
for PR 7004 at commit
Github user Rosstin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#discussion_r33719147
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -211,22 +211,22 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117817655
[Test build #36301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36301/consoleFull)
for PR 7166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117817442
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#discussion_r33712588
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -193,11 +199,36 @@ class LinearRegression(override val uid:
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#discussion_r33713902
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +158,25 @@ object Statistics {
def chiSqTest(data:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117799304
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117799319
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33714143
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1223,6 +1232,9 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
}
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6672#issuecomment-117799361
@JoshRosen Any more thoughts on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#discussion_r33714571
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -211,22 +211,22 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#discussion_r33714575
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -211,22 +211,22 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33714625
--- Diff:
network/shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleClient.java
---
@@ -138,6 +139,26 @@ public void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117800161
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33719412
--- Diff:
network/shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleClient.java
---
@@ -138,6 +139,26 @@ public void
GitHub user feynmanliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166
[SPARK-5016] Distribute GMM mixture components to executors
Distribute expensive portions of computation for Gaussian mixture
components (in particular, pre-computation of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7146#issuecomment-117798423
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117798935
It wasn't clear to me how to use DFs in the result classes I was creating
since they didn't have access to the model parameters (featuresCol,
predictionCol, etc).
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33714016
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -111,12 +113,19 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
//
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6433#issuecomment-117799019
@RoyGao Could you please create a JIRA and add it to this PR's title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33714710
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117800154
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117800176
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117800175
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33714772
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#issuecomment-117805393
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#issuecomment-117805408
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JDrit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#discussion_r33716906
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -398,6 +398,40 @@
artifactIdpy4j/artifactId
version0.8.2.1/version
/dependency
+dependency
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#discussion_r33717906
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/KSTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117813319
It wasn't clear to me how to use DFs in the result classes I was creating
since they didn't have access to the model parameters (featuresCol,
predictionCol, etc). I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117815373
[Test build #36288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36288/console)
for PR 6904 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117816111
[Test build #36299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36299/consoleFull)
for PR 7165 at commit
GitHub user Rosstin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167
[SPARK-8660] [MLLib] removed symbols from comments in
LogisticRegressionSuite.scala for ease of copypaste
'' symbols removed from comments in LogisticRegressionSuite.scala, for
ease of copypaste
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#discussion_r33722239
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/CountVectorizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user Rosstin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117820353
@mengxr Would it be desirable to un-multiline the LOC in the file's
comments? Or should these remain multiline to follow style? (What I mean is,
the lines are long
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33723836
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117826371
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117826411
For copypasteing in Scala mode :paste mode makes the multi-line copy/past
work well (although requires remembering that + ctrl-d)
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33725936
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -253,7 +253,9 @@ class PairUDF extends GenericUDF {
)
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33725957
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-117828706
[Test build #36303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36303/consoleFull)
for PR 5423 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726438
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -684,7 +684,9 @@ class UtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
ResetSystemProperties
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#issuecomment-117832235
@tnachen can you address the comments to simplify this patch using
`spark.executor.cores` instead? As discussed above this is an optional setting
and reuses the same
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117832863
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#discussion_r33728044
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +123,13 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117832900
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117835854
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117835834
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117837584
[Test build #36306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36306/console)
for PR 7165 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33729664
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117820196
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ckadner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7144#issuecomment-117820180
@JoshRosen -- Hi Josh, thanks for kicking of the tests. Can you help me
make sense of the test results?
I only changed a markdown file, no test cases should be
GitHub user piganesh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7168
[SPARK-8695] [core] [WIP] TreeAggregation shouldn't be triggered for â¦
â¦5 partitions
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117823839
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117823675
**[Test build #36289 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36289/console)**
for PR 6648 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117827909
[Test build #36302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36302/consoleFull)
for PR 6648 at commit
GitHub user deroneriksson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169
[SPARK-1564] [Docs] Added Javascript to Javadocs to create badges for tags
like :: Experimental ::
Modified copy_api_dirs.rb and created api-javadocs.js and api-javadocs.css
files in order
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33726149
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -124,10 +124,16 @@ private[spark] class
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#issuecomment-117829855
Heroic effort here. It certainly is big but is fixing up a lot of little
issues of this form. I flagged a few more questions about it but it is looking
pretty good.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117831150
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117831126
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117832007
[Test build #36294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36294/console)
for PR 7139 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117832118
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7049#discussion_r33727646
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -379,31 +379,25 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117833346
[Test build #36305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36305/consoleFull)
for PR 7131 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117834553
[Test build #36306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36306/consoleFull)
for PR 7165 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33729199
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117835313
@JoshRosen @shaneknapp -- So in this case the SparkR unit tests failed but
the AmpLabJenkins message says Test Passed ? Do you know what could cause this ?
---
If
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117837038
Let's keep the line width within 100. As @holdenk mentioned, we can copy
paste a paragraph of code to Scala and ipython easily. I also tried RStudio,
which takes
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117836993
[Test build #36307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36307/consoleFull)
for PR 7131 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117818124
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117818081
[Test build #36291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36291/console)
for PR 7132 at commit
Github user jonalter commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#issuecomment-117820014
@srowen - I have addressed the point you made regarding using log rather
than println in some cases. Please let me know what you think. Thank you.
---
If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7144#issuecomment-117821666
This is a rare build flakiness issue that we haven't diagnosed. I kicked
off tests just to test out a pull request builder script change. This change
looks fine to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7168#issuecomment-117823182
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117825520
@brkyvz Thanks for sending out this PR. Its looking good. I had a couple of
high level points
1. It might be good to point out in some of the error messages how the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117825624
[Test build #36301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36301/console)
for PR 7166 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726211
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/NumericParserSuite.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ class NumericParserSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-117828238
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#discussion_r33728151
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -211,35 +226,43 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117833781
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117833756
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33728907
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33729777
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117837626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117818193
[Test build #36299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36299/console)
for PR 7165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117818218
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33723361
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -124,10 +124,16 @@ private[spark] class
401 - 500 of 1082 matches
Mail list logo
