Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117833753
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117833680
[Test build #36304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36304/console)
for PR 7169 at commit
[`65b4930`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117833346
[Test build #36305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36305/consoleFull)
for PR 7131 at commit
[`7104e97`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#discussion_r33728151
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -211,35 +226,43 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#discussion_r33728044
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +123,13 @@ private[spark] class Coa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117832863
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7131#issuecomment-117832900
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#issuecomment-117832235
@tnachen can you address the comments to simplify this patch using
`spark.executor.cores` instead? As discussed above this is an optional setting
and reuses the same
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117832118
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117832007
[Test build #36294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36294/console)
for PR 7139 at commit
[`0226768`](https://github.
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7049#discussion_r33727646
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -379,31 +379,25 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117831769
[Test build #36304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36304/consoleFull)
for PR 7169 at commit
[`65b4930`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117831150
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117831126
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7037#issuecomment-117831062
@holdenk Cool. I'll work on this tonight. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117830413
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117830371
[Test build #36297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36297/console)
for PR 7132 at commit
[`271610b`](https://github.
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117830367
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#issuecomment-117829855
Heroic effort here. It certainly is big but is fixing up a lot of little
issues of this form. I flagged a few more questions about it but it is looking
pretty good.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-117828706
[Test build #36303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36303/consoleFull)
for PR 5423 at commit
[`e7897ae`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726438
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -684,7 +684,9 @@ class UtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
ResetSystemProperties
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7037#issuecomment-117828532
@dbtsai I've extended the test coverage.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-117828219
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726272
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/GradientBoostedTreesSuite.scala
---
@@ -111,8 +115,10 @@ class GradientBoostedTreesSuite extends Sp
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169#issuecomment-117828197
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-117828238
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726211
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/NumericParserSuite.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ class NumericParserSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
GitHub user deroneriksson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7169
[SPARK-1564] [Docs] Added Javascript to Javadocs to create badges for tags
like :: Experimental ::
Modified copy_api_dirs.rb and created api-javadocs.js and api-javadocs.css
files in order to
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33726149
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -124,10 +124,16 @@ private[spark] class DiskBlockManager(blockManager:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117827909
[Test build #36302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36302/consoleFull)
for PR 6648 at commit
[`55a9bb1`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726108
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/debug/package.scala ---
@@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ package object debug {
visited += new
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726033
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -186,7 +186,9 @@ private[hive] object HiveQl {
.map(ast => Opti
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33726020
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientWrapper.scala ---
@@ -360,7 +360,9 @@ private[hive] class ClientWrapper(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33725957
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends QueryT
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33725936
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -253,7 +253,9 @@ class PairUDF extends GenericUDF {
)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117826919
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117826946
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117826411
For copypasteing in Scala mode :paste mode makes the multi-line copy/past
work well (although requires remembering that + ctrl-d)
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117826371
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#issuecomment-117825840
Looking at this is on my to-do list...I'll take a look this afternoon or
tomorrow!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117825721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7139#issuecomment-117825520
@brkyvz Thanks for sending out this PR. Its looking good. I had a couple of
high level points
1. It might be good to point out in some of the error messages how the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117825624
[Test build #36301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36301/console)
for PR 7166 at commit
[`1da3c7f`](https://github.
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#discussion_r33724583
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117823675
**[Test build #36289 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36289/console)**
for PR 6648 at commit
[`55a9bb1`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-117823839
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7168#issuecomment-117823182
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33724190
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user piganesh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7168
[SPARK-8695] [core] [WIP] TreeAggregation shouldn't be triggered for â¦
â¦5 partitions
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ibmsoe/
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6870#discussion_r33723836
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7144#issuecomment-117821666
This is a rare build flakiness issue that we haven't diagnosed. I kicked
off tests just to test out a pull request builder script change. This change
looks fine to m
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33723361
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -124,10 +124,16 @@ private[spark] class DiskBlockManager(blockManager:
Github user Rosstin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117820353
@mengxr Would it be desirable to un-multiline the LOC in the file's
comments? Or should these remain multiline to follow style? (What I mean is,
the lines are long enoug
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167#issuecomment-117820196
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user ckadner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7144#issuecomment-117820180
@JoshRosen -- Hi Josh, thanks for kicking of the tests. Can you help me
make sense of the test results?
I only changed a markdown file, no test cases should be i
Github user jonalter commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#issuecomment-117820014
@srowen - I have addressed the point you made regarding using log rather
than println in some cases. Please let me know what you think. Thank you.
---
If your project
GitHub user Rosstin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7167
[SPARK-8660] [MLLib] removed > symbols from comments in
LogisticRegressionSuite.scala for ease of copypaste
'>' symbols removed from comments in LogisticRegressionSuite.scala, for
ease of copypaste
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#discussion_r33722239
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/CountVectorizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117818218
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117818193
[Test build #36299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36299/console)
for PR 7165 at commit
[`867754a`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117818124
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117818081
[Test build #36291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36291/console)
for PR 7132 at commit
[`fd67721`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117817655
[Test build #36301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36301/consoleFull)
for PR 7166 at commit
[`1da3c7f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117817442
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166#issuecomment-117817472
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user feynmanliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7166
[SPARK-5016] Distribute GMM mixture components to executors
Distribute expensive portions of computation for Gaussian mixture
components (in particular, pre-computation of
`MultivariateGaussia
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#issuecomment-117816243
[Test build #36300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36300/consoleFull)
for PR 6750 at commit
[`ada7726`](https://gith
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#discussion_r33720404
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1002,6 +1001,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
val stageId = task.stageId
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117816111
[Test build #36299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36299/consoleFull)
for PR 7165 at commit
[`867754a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117815559
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#discussion_r33720045
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#issuecomment-117815541
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#issuecomment-117815561
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117815464
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165#issuecomment-117815530
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117815373
[Test build #36288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36288/console)
for PR 6904 at commit
[`252c6b7`](https://github.
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7165
[SPARK-8766] support non-ascii character in column names
Use UTF-8 to encode the name of column in Python 2, or it may failed to
encode with default encoding ('ascii').
You can merge this pull reque
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117813319
> It wasn't clear to me how to use DFs in the result classes I was creating
since they didn't have access to the model parameters (featuresCol,
predictionCol, etc). I
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33719412
--- Diff:
network/shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleClient.java
---
@@ -138,6 +139,26 @@ public void registerWithShuffleSe
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#issuecomment-117812183
@andrewor14 thanks for you thorough review. I'll address your comments
tomorrow (my timezone).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user Rosstin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#discussion_r33719147
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -211,22 +211,22 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite exten
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#discussion_r33719046
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4984#discussion_r33718904
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -124,10 +124,16 @@ private[spark] class DiskBlockManager(blockManager:
Bl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117809340
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-117809049
[Test build #36295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36295/console)
for PR 7099 at commit
[`9509c79`](https://github.
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#issuecomment-117808024
@josepablocam In the PR description, please also include a summary of this
PR because it becomes part of the commit message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#discussion_r33717906
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/KSTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#discussion_r33717824
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/KSTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#discussion_r33717826
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/KSTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#issuecomment-117805703
[Test build #36298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36298/consoleFull)
for PR 7004 at commit
[`d421bf5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#issuecomment-117805393
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JDrit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#discussion_r33716906
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -398,6 +398,40 @@
py4j
0.8.2.1
+
+ org.apache.avro
+ avro
+ ${av
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7004#issuecomment-117805408
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7144#issuecomment-117805209
[Test build #36296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36296/console)
for PR 7144 at commit
[`65d80f7`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7144#issuecomment-117805232
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117804934
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117804894
[Test build #36286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36286/console)
for PR 7132 at commit
[`26cc177`](https://github.
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7064#issuecomment-117804916
topicDistributions does not include the empty documents because those
vertices are dropped during learning. Look at this line:
[https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/1
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7140
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7064#discussion_r33716305
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDASuite.scala ---
@@ -99,9 +99,15 @@ class LDASuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLlibTestS
501 - 600 of 1142 matches
Mail list logo