Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118745945
Thanks for looking at this. Going to merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7197#discussion_r33909453
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -44,60 +47,77 @@
5, 5, 5, 5,
6, 6, 6, 6};
+
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7214#discussion_r33909072
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1580,22 +1580,37 @@ object functions {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118744074
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118744073
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118743990
[Test build #36558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36558/console)
for PR 7232 at commit
[`934d3d1`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118743989
[Test build #36557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36557/console)
for PR 7231 at commit
[`8be4723`](https://github.
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#issuecomment-118743957
We should add a way to cast interval into string and string to interval
too. That can go in a separate pull request though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#discussion_r33908974
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1458,4 +1458,14 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
BeforeAndAfterA
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#discussion_r33908958
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -303,6 +303,10 @@ private[sql] object ResolvedDataSource {
mode: SaveMo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7157#issuecomment-118743737
[Test build #36562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36562/consoleFull)
for PR 7157 at commit
[`2876cbd`](https://gith
Github user mallman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6832#issuecomment-118743436
@srowen I just returned from my vacation abroad and am catching up. Sorry
for the wait. I'll take a look at this tomorrow. Cheers.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7157#issuecomment-118743342
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7157#issuecomment-118743331
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7214#discussion_r33908578
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1580,22 +1580,37 @@ object functions {
///
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-118738599
[Test build #36561 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36561/console)
for PR 6737 at commit
[`06d13ef`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-118738773
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7209#issuecomment-118737760
@scwf Yeah, I didn't make the `element` to `array` change in #7231. It
would be good to have one, either based on this PR or open a new one. The
tricky part is it need
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#discussion_r33908086
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DayTimeIntervalType.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118736827
Tried this out locally and works fine. LGTM as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118735867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118735791
[Test build #36560 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36560/console)
for PR 7084 at commit
[`24728e4`](https://github.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#discussion_r33907699
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +303,27 @@ case class StringLength(child: E
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#discussion_r33907684
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -301,6 +303,27 @@ case class StringLength(child: E
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118735055
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user HuJiayin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-118735097
@rxin @davies @liancheng can you trigger the unit test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-118733142
[Test build #36561 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36561/consoleFull)
for PR 6737 at commit
[`06d13ef`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-118732111
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-118732126
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118730797
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118730681
[Test build #36556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36556/console)
for PR 7219 at commit
[`537579a`](https://github.
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-118730215
Hey @rtreffer, just want to make sure whether you are still working on
this? I'm asking because I just opened #7231 to refactor Parquet read path for
interoperability
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118729997
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7233#issuecomment-118727714
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118726940
[Test build #36560 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36560/consoleFull)
for PR 7084 at commit
[`24728e4`](https://gith
GitHub user ggupta81 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7233
Fixed First and Last aggregates to compute first and last value per Gâ¦
In current implementation, First and Last aggregates were calculating the
values for entire DataFrame partition and then the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118725388
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118725374
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118725060
Thank a lot @jkbradley. I sent an update with:
1. change the class name to CountVectorizerModel.
2. make vocab a val.
3. change minTermCount to minTermFreq and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118724246
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#issuecomment-118724201
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118721775
Yep, just what I need :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#discussion_r33906404
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SqlParser.scala ---
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ class SqlParser extends AbstractSparkSQLParser with
Da
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118721345
[Test build #36558 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36558/consoleFull)
for PR 7232 at commit
[`934d3d1`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7227#issuecomment-118720578
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118720476
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7227#issuecomment-118720548
Jenkins, test this please.
(Did something go wrong with Jenkins?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5632#issuecomment-118720543
Hi @srowen , if the assembly jar is not found using this pattern
`target/scala-*/spark-streaming-kafka-assembly-*.jar`, the python Kafka test
will not be run at all.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7226#discussion_r33906339
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DayTimeIntervalType.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118720493
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#issuecomment-118719989
cc @yijieshen I think you were looking for this in round?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232
[SPARK-8831][SQL] Support AbstractDataType in TypeCollection.
Otherwise it is impossible to declare an expression supporting DecimalType.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runni
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7232#discussion_r33906266
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -708,8 +708,6 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6971#discussion_r33906234
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -47,4 +48,44 @@ case class Md5(child: Expression)
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118719759
I made a minor comment regarding the name. Pending that small update this
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#discussion_r33906211
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1826,6 +1830,26 @@
+
+
+ release-profile
--- End diff --
Actuall
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#discussion_r33906199
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1826,6 +1830,26 @@
+
+
+ release-profile
--- End diff --
Can you
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6971#discussion_r33906097
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -47,4 +48,44 @@ case class Md5(child: Expression)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7214#discussion_r33906065
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1580,22 +1580,37 @@ object functions {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7230
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user zhichao-li commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-118715210
cc @rxin @davies could you take a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7230#issuecomment-118714652
Thanks - merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7204#issuecomment-118711831
@rxin Thank you for letting me know. I have updated my github email in my
account profile.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118710803
[Test build #36557 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36557/consoleFull)
for PR 7231 at commit
[`8be4723`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6971#discussion_r33905466
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -47,4 +48,44 @@ case class Md5(child: Expression)
"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118710134
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118710172
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7214#discussion_r33905262
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1580,22 +1580,37 @@ object functions {
///
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7204#issuecomment-118709270
@yu-iskw you might want to update your github email to include the email
address you used for your commits. Otherwise it doesn't show up in the github
metadata.
---
If y
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7214#discussion_r33905094
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1580,22 +1580,37 @@ object functions {
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7214#discussion_r33904993
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1580,22 +1580,37 @@ object functions {
///
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#discussion_r33904801
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -298,3 +299,56 @@ case class StringLength(chi
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-118708012
@squito oh...I had skipped it...
1) Task attempt now is described in `TaskInfo` in Spark `TaskSetManager`.
`TaskSetManager` is responsible for completing task attem
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7204#issuecomment-118707328
@shivaram Thank you for merging it!
I agree with that. I will check the lintr code and ask Jim it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7204
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7204#issuecomment-118706866
Thanks @yu-iskw. BTW We should investigate how to get rid of the false
warnings `no visible global function definition` as those functions are package
private.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118705402
[Test build #36556 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36556/consoleFull)
for PR 7219 at commit
[`537579a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118703671
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118703711
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118703589
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118703559
[Test build #36555 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36555/console)
for PR 7185 at commit
[`fd13937`](https://github.
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#issuecomment-118703366
@srowen @pwendell please let me know whether I understood your comments
correctly in the latest commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7219#discussion_r33904037
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1826,6 +1830,26 @@
+
+
+ release
--- End diff --
I still need
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-118700999
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-118700970
[Test build #36552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36552/console)
for PR 6783 at commit
[`cbaf9f5`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-118700840
[Test build #999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/999/console)
for PR 7115 at commit
[`f88d320`](https://github.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118700156
[Test build #36555 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36555/consoleFull)
for PR 7185 at commit
[`fd13937`](https://gith
Github user Sephiroth-Lin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7209#issuecomment-118699916
@liancheng OK, good, thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118699892
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118699883
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6971#issuecomment-118699528
[Test build #998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/998/console)
for PR 6971 at commit
[`d79088b`](https://github.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-118699444
[Test build #999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/999/consoleFull)
for PR 7115 at commit
[`f88d320`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6971#issuecomment-118699427
[Test build #998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/998/consoleFull)
for PR 6971 at commit
[`d79088b`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118698676
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118698670
[Test build #36554 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36554/console)
for PR 7231 at commit
[`9b87903`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118695116
[Test build #36554 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36554/consoleFull)
for PR 7231 at commit
[`9b87903`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118694192
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7231#issuecomment-118694202
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7084#discussion_r33902864
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/CountVectorizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
