Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339#issuecomment-120256576
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-120256351
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120256352
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120256316
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-120256322
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120256223
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user prabeesh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-120254773
@tdas I am working on it. Will update you soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#discussion_r34331212
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -387,3 +387,67 @@ case class MinOf(left: Expressio
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-120251015
@yhuai it seems not possible to do checking in `CheckAnalysis` because
LogicalRelation or LogicalRDD is not accessible there. Any ideas?
---
If your project is set up
Github user HuJiayin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-120250661
This patch fails MiMa tests.
[error] running /home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder@2/dev/mima
; received return code 255
Can you help on this? Thanks m
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-120249687
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-120249301
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-120249290
[Test build #37017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37017/console)
for PR 7115 at commit
[`59322bc`](https://github.
GitHub user yijieshen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342
[SPARK-6941][SQL] Provide a better error message to when inserting into RDD
based table
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6941
You can merge this pull request into a Git repositor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339#issuecomment-120248189
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7341#issuecomment-120248151
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-120248126
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-120248085
[Test build #37008 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37008/console)
for PR 7280 at commit
[`733015a`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339#issuecomment-120248120
[Test build #37010 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37010/console)
for PR 7339 at commit
[`394d3ac`](https://github.
GitHub user rahulpalamuttam opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7341
[SPARK-8923] [Documentation, MLlib] Add @since tags to mllib.fpm
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rahulpalamuttam/spark T
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7274#issuecomment-120247772
[Test build #37007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37007/console)
for PR 7274 at commit
[`40c8f9f`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7274#issuecomment-120247808
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-120247329
[Test build #37017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37017/consoleFull)
for PR 7115 at commit
[`59322bc`](https://gith
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#issuecomment-120247243
This fix is kind of hack things to me.
It'd be better to check the code size and, if it is over 64KB (the janino
limitation), throw an exception
to fall back into
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120247317
[Test build #37018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37018/consoleFull)
for PR 6444 at commit
[`35dad9f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-120247173
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120247172
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120247145
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-120247127
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120244299
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120244247
[Test build #37003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37003/console)
for PR 7338 at commit
[`4b92e48`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#issuecomment-120243436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#issuecomment-120243289
[Test build #37014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37014/console)
for PR 7278 at commit
[`f9778e0`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-120238252
[Test build #37016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37016/consoleFull)
for PR 4960 at commit
[`aa484c6`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120237679
@davies, there's one minor change in `SparkPlanTest` that I want to
partially undo: the sorting prior to output comparison should continue to be
opt-out, not opt-in, s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-120237734
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#discussion_r34329354
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillWriter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-120237781
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-120237364
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#discussion_r34329090
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -439,6 +439,12 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120234581
[Test build #37015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37015/consoleFull)
for PR 6444 at commit
[`5135200`](https://gith
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#discussion_r34328802
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -439,6 +439,12 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120234234
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120234250
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7340#issuecomment-120234073
[Test build #37013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37013/consoleFull)
for PR 7340 at commit
[`59658cf`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7255#issuecomment-120233904
[Test build #37000 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37000/console)
for PR 7255 at commit
[`e13aab1`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7255#issuecomment-120234002
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120233865
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#issuecomment-120233856
[Test build #37014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37014/consoleFull)
for PR 7278 at commit
[`f9778e0`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#issuecomment-120233731
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#issuecomment-120233721
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7340#issuecomment-120233714
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120233717
[Test build #37006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37006/console)
for PR 7338 at commit
[`d41e80f`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7338#issuecomment-120233735
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7340#issuecomment-120233727
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7278#issuecomment-120233375
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7340
[CORE][Minor]change the log level to info
Too many logs even when set the log level to warning.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-120232978
[Test build #1034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1034/console)
for PR 7091 at commit
[`365838f`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120232832
[Test build #37012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37012/consoleFull)
for PR 6851 at commit
[`7a6bdbb`](https://gith
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#discussion_r34328421
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ArithmeticExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +157,18 @@ class ArithmeticE
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#issuecomment-120232530
Actually, is there much difference between this and `CrossValidator` other
than being able to specify `trainRatio`? There seems to be a lot of code
duplication betw
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120232026
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120232004
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120231828
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120231777
[Test build #36998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36998/console)
for PR 6444 at commit
[`5135200`](https://github.
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120230751
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#discussion_r34328160
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7336#issuecomment-120229996
>This patch we shuffle data by the partition columns firstly so that each
partition will have ony one partition file and this also reduce the gc overhead.
@lianchen
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#issuecomment-120229395
Done for now. This is in very good shape.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user vinodkc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7040#discussion_r34328058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionals.scala
---
@@ -296,9 +295,7 @@ case class CaseKeyWhen(key: Expres
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120227701
[Test build #37011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37011/consoleFull)
for PR 6851 at commit
[`7a6bdbb`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120227614
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120227708
[Test build #37011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37011/console)
for PR 6851 at commit
[`7a6bdbb`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120227720
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120227552
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120227302
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7253#issuecomment-120227192
imo that would not be correct @vanzin for the case when a1 is completed,
and a2 is incomplete if a1 start times before a2, doing descending start time
check would imp
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339#issuecomment-120227206
[Test build #37010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37010/consoleFull)
for PR 7339 at commit
[`394d3ac`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339#issuecomment-120227167
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339#issuecomment-120227159
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-120226921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-120226817
[Test build #36996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36996/console)
for PR 7091 at commit
[`365838f`](https://github.
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6672#issuecomment-120226827
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7339
[SPARK-8970][SQL] remove unnecessary abstraction for ExtractValue
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark minor
Alter
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#discussion_r34327741
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#discussion_r34327673
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#discussion_r34327642
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#discussion_r34327625
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7337#discussion_r34327593
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120224475
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120224398
[Test build #37001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37001/console)
for PR 6851 at commit
[`7a6bdbb`](https://github.
Github user meawoppl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6336#issuecomment-120223987
Should we chime in on that thread?
--Matthew Goodman
=
Check Out My Website: http://craneium.net
Find me on LinkedIn: http:/
Github user meawoppl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6336#issuecomment-120223770
I dosen't appear there was ever a consensus reached there. My major
complaint in this all is that I actually had to sit down an draw a giant
flow chart of how al
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120223080
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6380#issuecomment-120222961
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6380#issuecomment-120222941
[Test build #36995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36995/console)
for PR 6380 at commit
[`25d`](https://github.
Github user nssalian commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7250#discussion_r34327159
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -581,6 +579,9 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#discussion_r34327077
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -47,11 +47,15 @@
5, 5, 5, 5,
6, 6, 6, 6};
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120222114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-120222067
[Test build #36992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36992/console)
for PR 6444 at commit
[`2f48777`](https://github.
1 - 100 of 1132 matches
Mail list logo
