Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122505596
[Test build #37696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37696/consoleFull)
for PR 7478 at commit
[`3a53278`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122505389
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122505334
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122504605
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122504600
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6112#issuecomment-122504545
[Test build #37694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37694/consoleFull)
for PR 6112 at commit
[`3e0a939`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#discussion_r34945166
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateMutableProjection.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,37 @@ object GenerateMu
Github user JDrit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34945159
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanSuite.scala
---
@@ -90,4 +90,11 @@ class HiveTableScanSuite extends HiveComp
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#discussion_r34945162
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateMutableProjection.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,37 @@ object GenerateMu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6112#issuecomment-122504419
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6112#issuecomment-122504417
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#discussion_r34945097
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -515,4 +521,91 @@ public int hashCode() {
}
return result
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#discussion_r34945058
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -515,4 +521,91 @@ public int hashCode() {
}
return result
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7486#issuecomment-122493336
[Test build #37693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37693/consoleFull)
for PR 7486 at commit
[`66bfbee`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7486#issuecomment-122491894
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7486#issuecomment-122491967
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mupakoz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7477#issuecomment-122490168
Of course, no problem :). I'll prepare the commit later today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7486#discussion_r34944828
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -208,169 +208,6 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest {
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7486
[SPARK-8240][SQL] string function: concat
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark concat
Alternatively you can review and apply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122489119
[Test build #37692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37692/consoleFull)
for PR 7194 at commit
[`3998ef2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122489096
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122489093
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122489019
[Test build #37691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37691/consoleFull)
for PR 7194 at commit
[`a2ba2e7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122488989
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122488991
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user saurfang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#issuecomment-122485318
I have pushed a new commit that if only one block is generated, then
projections will be inlined as before. Can you please review? Or do you prefer
I doing the other ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7459#issuecomment-122485381
[Test build #37690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37690/consoleFull)
for PR 7459 at commit
[`2ec5ce1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7459#issuecomment-122485082
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7459#issuecomment-122485080
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user saurfang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#discussion_r34944623
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -42,4 +42,8 @@ class CodeGenerationSuite ex
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7459#issuecomment-122485016
@dragos @andrewor14 thanks for suggestions. I updated this and removed the
two methods.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7450#issuecomment-122484843
[Test build #1098 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1098/console)
for PR 7450 at commit
[`e80bf9f`](https://github
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7479#discussion_r34944515
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catal
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7472#issuecomment-122483794
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7472#issuecomment-122483776
[Test build #37687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37687/console)
for PR 7472 at commit
[`b1be549`](https://github.
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7416#discussion_r34944353
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ private[sql] class MyDenseVector(val data: Array[Double]
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122483507
@JDrit Just finished my review. Seems we do not need to make any change in
`LogicalPlan.scala`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7479#discussion_r34944321
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catal
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/VirtualColumnSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944322
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/VirtualColumnSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944318
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanSuite.scala
---
@@ -90,4 +90,11 @@ class HiveTableScanSuite extends HiveComp
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944319
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanSuite.scala
---
@@ -90,4 +90,11 @@ class HiveTableScanSuite extends HiveComp
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944312
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ColumnExpressionSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
+impo
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944314
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.{HashPartitioner, SparkEnv}
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944311
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -1018,6 +1022,20 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
SparkContext)
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944231
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -212,6 +212,25 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944170
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -212,6 +212,25 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944166
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -235,10 +254,13 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extend
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34944153
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -235,10 +254,13 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extend
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7274#issuecomment-122480553
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7274#issuecomment-122480515
[Test build #37684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37684/console)
for PR 7274 at commit
[`f279cdf`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122480369
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122480356
[Test build #37686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37686/console)
for PR 7478 at commit
[`ae7e747`](https://github.
Github user zhangjiajin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#discussion_r34943941
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -82,20 +86,69 @@ class PrefixSpan private (
logWarning("Input
Github user zhangjiajin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#discussion_r34943942
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -82,20 +86,69 @@ class PrefixSpan private (
logWarning("Input
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7380#issuecomment-122480109
@mengxr Sure. I can take a look.
How do we handle API modifications? Any change moves the tag to the newest
version?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122479950
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122479937
[Test build #37685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37685/console)
for PR 7485 at commit
[`6349bbc`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#issuecomment-122479710
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#issuecomment-122479699
[Test build #37688 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37688/console)
for PR 7318 at commit
[`d75e894`](https://github.
Github user serialx commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7443#issuecomment-122479463
@JoshRosen @andrewor14 The ports added are from options flags
'--authorized-address' which should be set to a secure ip origin. So, it's not
opening to the world. I thin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7450#issuecomment-122479420
[Test build #1098 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1098/consoleFull)
for PR 7450 at commit
[`e80bf9f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122479056
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122479053
[Test build #37682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37682/console)
for PR 7194 at commit
[`630ebc5`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#issuecomment-122479020
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#issuecomment-122479010
[Test build #37680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37680/console)
for PR 6981 at commit
[`4afc09c`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122478504
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7380#issuecomment-122477450
@manishamde @chouqin Could you make a pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7482#issuecomment-122477415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7477#issuecomment-122477418
@mupakoz I got the same result as @srowen . I don't think changing the seed
is the solution. Instead, we should add more rows to
`sample_naive_bayes_data.txt`. Could you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7482#issuecomment-122477395
[Test build #37681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37681/console)
for PR 7482 at commit
[`5220cce`](https://github.
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-122477288
This is a very good performance for ML.I will test this feature on
[cloudml/zen](https://github.com/cloudml/zen)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#issuecomment-122477226
[Test build #37688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37688/consoleFull)
for PR 7318 at commit
[`d75e894`](https://gith
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122477206
Thank you for merging it and your continuous support!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7481#issuecomment-122477162
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks! (It would be better to implement this
when we really need it.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7484#issuecomment-122477150
I think the idea is to run stuff like take much faster. Why do we want to
remove this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#issuecomment-122477110
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122477117
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#issuecomment-122477116
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7194#issuecomment-122477114
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#issuecomment-122477096
@shivaram This should be ready for review after Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7318#discussion_r34943565
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -949,6 +949,17 @@ test_that("fillna() on a DataFrame", {
expect_identical(expected, actual)
})
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7472#issuecomment-122476714
[Test build #37687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37687/consoleFull)
for PR 7472 at commit
[`b1be549`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7472#issuecomment-122476591
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7472#issuecomment-122476594
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7472#issuecomment-122476586
Added a wrong entry to `.gitignore`, generated `Suit.java` wasn't
committed, and caused the last build error.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#discussion_r34943299
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -235,10 +254,13 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extend
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122473476
[Test build #37686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37686/consoleFull)
for PR 7478 at commit
[`ae7e747`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122472989
[Test build #37685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37685/consoleFull)
for PR 7485 at commit
[`6349bbc`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122472556
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122472591
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122472590
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122472548
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-12247
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-122472235
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122472184
Yup you can add it to FunctionRegistry and it will be available in the
parser automatically after that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122469640
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7473#discussion_r34943083
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -320,16 +320,17 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Ca
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7485#issuecomment-122469154
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
1 - 100 of 1000 matches
Mail list logo
