Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7465#discussion_r36495071
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/SQLTransformer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#discussion_r36495087
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/ShuffledHashOuterJoin.scala
---
@@ -1,97 +1,94 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apache
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#issuecomment-128616625
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#discussion_r36495089
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/FromUnsafe.scala
---
@@ -52,6 +53,8 @@ case class FromUnsafe(child: Ex
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7465#discussion_r36495070
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/SQLTransformer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7465#discussion_r36495073
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/SQLTransformer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128616385
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#issuecomment-128616462
[Test build #40153 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40153/consoleFull)
for PR 7990 at commit
[`c13d1e3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128616376
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#discussion_r36495029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastHashOuterJoin.scala
---
@@ -1,122 +1,119 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apac
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128616394
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128616378
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128615201
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026
[SPARK-9735][SQL]Respect the user specified schema than the infer partition
schema for HadoopFsRelation
To enable the unit test of `hadoopFsRelationSuite.Partition column type
casting`. It p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#issuecomment-128614684
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#issuecomment-128614705
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7994#issuecomment-128614281
This issue seems to be fixed according to recent build results of the SBT
master builder and my experimental builder. I've stopped the experimental
builder, but didn't
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128613934
[Test build #40151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40151/console)
for PR 7904 at commit
[`82b7e45`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128613936
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128613496
[Test build #40151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40151/consoleFull)
for PR 7904 at commit
[`82b7e45`](https://gith
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8016#issuecomment-128613469
LGTM, thanks to working on this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7981#issuecomment-128613446
[Test build #40152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40152/consoleFull)
for PR 7981 at commit
[`58b7332`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8005#issuecomment-128613097
Merging in master & branch-1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8005#issuecomment-128612972
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8005#issuecomment-128612932
[Test build #40138 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40138/console)
for PR 8005 at commit
[`f9c4aff`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7833#issuecomment-128612930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7833#issuecomment-128612863
[Test build #40141 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40141/console)
for PR 7833 at commit
[`9570bec`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7981#issuecomment-128612856
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128612840
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128612857
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7981#issuecomment-128612833
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#discussion_r36493967
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/RowFormatConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -87,4 +91,36 @@ class RowFormatConvertersSuite extends
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#issuecomment-128611173
@cloud-fan The changes looks good to me, but the title does not reflect the
problem here, it make me confusing in the begging. Could you change it to say
"copy UTF8String
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7802#issuecomment-128611100
[Test build #1402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1402/consoleFull)
for PR 7802 at commit
[`e5e93b2`](https://git
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7788#issuecomment-128611025
Mark it as WIP, I will take more time in investigating that how to
integrate with Hive UDAF.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8020#issuecomment-128610913
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128610404
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128610394
[Test build #40150 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40150/console)
for PR 7904 at commit
[`bdf513c`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7802#issuecomment-128610460
[Test build #1398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1398/console)
for PR 7802 at commit
[`e5e93b2`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8020#issuecomment-128610624
[Test build #40140 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40140/console)
for PR 8020 at commit
[`0e15b12`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128609832
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128609509
[Test build #40150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40150/consoleFull)
for PR 7904 at commit
[`bdf513c`](https://gith
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#discussion_r36493512
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/RowFormatConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -87,4 +91,36 @@ class RowFormatConvertersSuite extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8012
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8012#issuecomment-128609377
Going to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8012#issuecomment-128609246
[Test build #1399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1399/console)
for PR 8012 at commit
[`16f4756`](https://github
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#discussion_r36493352
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/FromUnsafe.scala
---
@@ -52,6 +53,8 @@ case class FromUnsafe(child: Express
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#discussion_r36493358
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -62,111 +100,250 @@ case class SortMergeJoin(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128608757
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128608772
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#discussion_r36493288
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/RowFormatConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -87,4 +91,36 @@ class RowFormatConvertersSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8017#issuecomment-128608097
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7990#discussion_r36493225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/FromUnsafe.scala
---
@@ -52,6 +53,8 @@ case class FromUnsafe(child: Ex
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#discussion_r36493188
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -62,111 +100,250 @@ case class SortMergeJoin(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8010#discussion_r36493200
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128608025
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7904#issuecomment-128608016
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8025#issuecomment-128607786
[Test build #40148 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40148/consoleFull)
for PR 8025 at commit
[`ec88ace`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#issuecomment-128607623
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8025#issuecomment-128607566
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8025#issuecomment-128607523
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8025
[SPARK-8382][SQL] Improve Analysis Unit test framework
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark analysis
Alternatively
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8018#issuecomment-128607278
[Test build #40147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40147/consoleFull)
for PR 8018 at commit
[`c861001`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8018#issuecomment-128607011
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8018#issuecomment-128606998
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#discussion_r36492704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -88,7 +87,6 @@ private[sql] object DataSo
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#discussion_r36492637
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ private[sql] object DataSo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7962
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8017#issuecomment-128606407
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7962#issuecomment-128606243
I've merged this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8017#issuecomment-128606422
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user carsonwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8017#issuecomment-128606109
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8021
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8024#issuecomment-128606081
[Test build #40144 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40144/consoleFull)
for PR 8024 at commit
[`5084675`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8021#issuecomment-128605958
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#issuecomment-128605635
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8024#issuecomment-128605573
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8024#issuecomment-128605614
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#issuecomment-128605586
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8018#issuecomment-128605533
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8018#issuecomment-128605506
[Test build #40139 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40139/console)
for PR 8018 at commit
[`7b70c28`](https://github.
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8024
[SPARK-9733][SQL] Improve explain message for data source scan node.
All data sources show up as "PhysicalRDD" in physical plan explain. It'd be
better if we can show the name of the data source.
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#discussion_r36492462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -98,8 +96,10 @@ private[sql] object DataS
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023
[SPARK-9689][SQL]Fix bug of not invalidate the cache for
InsertIntoHadoopFsRelation
We didn't refresh the cache in `InsertIntoHadoopFsRelation`, however, even
by adding the fresh operation,
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8023#issuecomment-128605307
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7961#issuecomment-128604965
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7986#issuecomment-128604823
duplicated with #7980 :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8006#issuecomment-128604806
cc @JoshRosen for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8009#issuecomment-128604788
cc @JoshRosen for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8015#issuecomment-128603507
[Test build #40132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40132/console)
for PR 8015 at commit
[`225eac2`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8015#issuecomment-128603714
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8008#issuecomment-128602302
[Test build #40134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40134/console)
for PR 8008 at commit
[`df72d8c`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8008#issuecomment-128602326
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7296#issuecomment-128600574
This is still good to have - it doesn't hurt to gzip the output
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7910#issuecomment-128600321
Yeah, we've been combatting a really bad test flakiness issue over the past
48 hours :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#issuecomment-128599819
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7961#issuecomment-128599380
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7961#issuecomment-128599311
**[Test build #40128 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40128/console)**
for PR 7961 at commit
[`ba9cfc7`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8014#issuecomment-128598367
[Test build #40143 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40143/consoleFull)
for PR 8014 at commit
[`8a977cd`](https://gith
GitHub user rotationsymmetry opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022
[SPARK-4980] [MLlib] Add decay factors to streaming linear methods
This PR includes an implementation of decay factors in streaming linear and
logistic regression. Unit tests are also inclu
1 - 100 of 1245 matches
Mail list logo
