Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37826150
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37826719
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37826703
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8218#issuecomment-134397827
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#discussion_r37811289
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +92,52 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8218#issuecomment-134397800
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134397628
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8369
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#discussion_r37815327
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/BaseYarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -144,7 +146,12 @@ abstract class BaseYarnClusterSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-134407440
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-134407423
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-134407449
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134407533
@shivaram These are the gists of floor.Rd to show the difference if using
`@name` or not. If there are any issues, I can revert the update.
- [floor.Rd with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-134407429
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8401#issuecomment-134409271
I've merged this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8241#issuecomment-134412363
@sabhyankar looks good overall:
* Do you mind resolving merge conflicts?
* Can you put #8248 #8247 #8243 #8241 and #8249 all in one PR and close
the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-134414470
**[Test build #41471 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41471/console)**
for PR 7629 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-134414535
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-134414533
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7211#issuecomment-134414624
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7211#issuecomment-134414652
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8400#issuecomment-134416658
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#issuecomment-134419771
**[Test build #41472 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41472/console)**
for PR 7052 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8404#issuecomment-134419793
[Test build #41491 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41491/consoleFull)
for PR 8404 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-134423253
[Test build #41492 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41492/consoleFull)
for PR 7629 at commit
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134423280
@shivaram sure. I have just modified it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8404#issuecomment-134423176
[Test build #41493 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41493/consoleFull)
for PR 8404 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8405#issuecomment-134424541
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8405#issuecomment-134424522
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8405
[SPARK-10210] [STREAMING] Filter out non-existent blocks before creating
BlockRDD
When write ahead log is not enabled, a recovered streaming driver still
tries to run jobs using pre-failure block
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8406#issuecomment-134426130
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8406#issuecomment-134426106
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8407#issuecomment-134428463
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134436438
Thank you for merging it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8340#discussion_r37824828
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -426,12 +440,24 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8388#issuecomment-134440584
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37825862
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134445042
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134445031
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37825925
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-134445039
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-134445051
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37826567
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134411921
[Test build #41486 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41486/console)
for PR 8403 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134412052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134412050
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8233#issuecomment-134411685
NVM, confirmed with @jkbradley on the umbrella JIRA.
LGTM except for the minor comment about avoiding closure capture of the
object
---
If your project
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7320#discussion_r37817800
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +62,74 @@ class FPGrowthModel[Item: ClassTag](val freqItemsets:
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7320#discussion_r37817819
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/FPGrowthSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,4 +276,30 @@ class FPGrowthSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8389#issuecomment-134415558
[Test build #41477 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41477/console)
for PR 8389 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8389#issuecomment-134415667
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-134422382
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7629#issuecomment-134422378
Yeah sounds good - might be good to let it run one more time just to be
sure it's not affecting jenkins somehow.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Marcelo
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134422300
@yu-iskw Thanks this is looking great ! I tried this locally and ran into
one small problem while running `knitr` (using `R/create-docs.sh`). It needs
the following
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8405#issuecomment-134427585
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134427495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134427432
[Test build #41494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41494/console)
for PR 8386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8386#issuecomment-134427496
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#discussion_r37823766
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingDecay.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#discussion_r37823725
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingDecay.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134434992
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8371
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7631#issuecomment-134435004
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134436096
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8408#issuecomment-134439126
[Test build #41501 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41501/consoleFull)
for PR 8408 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#discussion_r37824754
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/StreamingLogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -184,4 +184,72 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8340#issuecomment-134439635
[Test build #41502 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41502/consoleFull)
for PR 8340 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134443205
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134443206
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8276#issuecomment-134443143
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8276#issuecomment-134443161
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134443119
[Test build #41490 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41490/console)
for PR 8403 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134445285
[Test build #41505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41505/consoleFull)
for PR 8007 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8338#issuecomment-134449642
Yes this LGTM - these are outdated and I don't even think MapR is advising
their customers to use these. They are asking people to use hadoop-provided,
which was
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-134449756
LGTM
CC @jkbradley this is blocking SPARK-9905 so do you mind reviewing when you
have a chance? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8218#issuecomment-134398249
[Test build #41481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41481/consoleFull)
for PR 8218 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8371#issuecomment-134400804
[Test build #41483 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41483/consoleFull)
for PR 8371 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134398599
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403#issuecomment-134398620
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#discussion_r37812058
--- Diff: core/src/test/resources/log4j.properties ---
@@ -16,13 +16,19 @@
#
# Set everything to be logged to the file target/unit-tests.log
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8276#issuecomment-134404199
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8276#issuecomment-134404198
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134404117
[Test build #41484 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41484/consoleFull)
for PR 8007 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8276#issuecomment-134404148
[Test build #41469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41469/console)
for PR 8276 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#discussion_r37812343
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/launcher/LauncherBackendSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8013#discussion_r37813021
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -645,3 +666,179 @@ private class LeastSquaresCostFun(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7052#discussion_r37813078
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/ChildProcAppHandle.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8013#discussion_r37813105
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -645,3 +666,179 @@ private class LeastSquaresCostFun(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134402295
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8007#issuecomment-134402310
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8403
[SPARK-10195] [SQL] Data sources Filter should not expose internal types
Spark SQL's data sources API exposes Catalyst's internal types through its
Filter interfaces. This is a problem because
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37825669
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-134443706
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-134443708
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-134443639
[Test build #41487 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41487/console)
for PR 8402 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#discussion_r37826062
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/linalg/__init__.py ---
@@ -461,32 +461,41 @@ def __init__(self, size, *args):
self.size = int(size)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-134445431
[Test build #41506 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41506/consoleFull)
for PR 7118 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8404#issuecomment-134449414
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8383#issuecomment-134449170
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
501 - 600 of 762 matches
Mail list logo
