Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8393#issuecomment-135583856
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7878#issuecomment-135584151
[Test build #41711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41711/consoleFull)
for PR 7878 at commit
[`cf58c49`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8490#issuecomment-135584661
LGTM, merging to 1.4, 1.5, and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8393#issuecomment-135584724
BTW - are there any way we can create a lightweight docker container with
some version of DB2 for testing the JDBC connectivity to DB2? (both from a
licensing pov and techn
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8490
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135588372
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492
[SPARK-10323] [SQL] fix nullability of In/InSet/ArrayContain
After this PR, In/InSet/ArrayContain will return null if value is null,
instead of false. They also will return null even if there is a nu
GitHub user feynmanliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491
[SPARK-9905] Adds LinearRegressionSummary user guide
* Adds user guide for LinearRegressionSummary
* Fixes unresolved issues in #8197
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491#issuecomment-135588711
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135588705
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135588718
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491#issuecomment-135588731
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135589035
[Test build #41712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41712/consoleFull)
for PR 8492 at commit
[`c3c65f8`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491#issuecomment-135589491
[Test build #41713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41713/consoleFull)
for PR 8491 at commit
[`4e5aaeb`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135591299
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491#issuecomment-135591430
[Test build #41713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41713/console)
for PR 8491 at commit
[`4e5aaeb`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135591401
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135591410
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491#issuecomment-135591494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8491#issuecomment-135591495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135591740
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135591715
[Test build #41712 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41712/console)
for PR 8492 at commit
[`c3c65f8`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135591739
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135592006
[Test build #41714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41714/consoleFull)
for PR 8484 at commit
[`35371fb`](https://gith
Github user rotationsymmetry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#discussion_r38162690
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingLinearRegressionWithSGD.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +52,7 @@ class StreamingLinearR
Github user rotationsymmetry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8022#discussion_r38163035
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingDecay.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135595930
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135595941
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135596210
[Test build #41715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41715/consoleFull)
for PR 8343 at commit
[`472c767`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135598213
[Test build #41715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41715/console)
for PR 8343 at commit
[`472c767`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135598611
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135598617
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6599#issuecomment-135598700
> I think that we should also backport this to branch-1.4.
+1 since we fix it in 1.5.0. Just confirmed this one didn't have conflicts
with branch-1.4.
---
If y
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#discussion_r38164639
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/local/LimitNode.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8458#issuecomment-135601195
@davies , @shivaram , Could you help to review it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8493
[SPARK-10326] [yarn] Fix app submission on windows.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vanzin/spark SPARK-10326
Alternatively you c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8493#issuecomment-135601511
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8493#issuecomment-135601503
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#discussion_r38165165
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/local/LocalNodeTest.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8493#issuecomment-135602276
[Test build #41716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41716/consoleFull)
for PR 8493 at commit
[`a14dba5`](https://gith
Github user ihainan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8480
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user XuTingjun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8477#issuecomment-135602834
Sorry that I don't declare the problem clearly.
When an app starts with CheckPoint file using [getOrCreate
method](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8399#issuecomment-135603112
Ping @mengxr In case I can't check this soon, it would be great to get this
into 1.5 if there is an RC3.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#issuecomment-135603138
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#discussion_r38165742
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/local/LocalNodeTest.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8399#issuecomment-135603184
[Test build #1700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1700/consoleFull)
for PR 8399 at commit
[`bada453`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#issuecomment-135603152
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#discussion_r38165750
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/local/LimitNode.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#issuecomment-135603859
[Test build #41717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41717/consoleFull)
for PR 8464 at commit
[`7dcd502`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7878#issuecomment-135604767
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7878#issuecomment-135604744
[Test build #41711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41711/console)
for PR 7878 at commit
[`cf58c49`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7878#issuecomment-135604771
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8399#issuecomment-135605403
[Test build #1700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1700/console)
for PR 8399 at commit
[`bada453`](https://github
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8464#discussion_r38166499
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/local/LimitNode.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-135615906
Alright I'm going to merge this as its better to do so before more breaking
style changes get in. Will watch Jenkins for the next couple of hours to make
sure things ar
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8125#discussion_r38167285
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/CombineSmallFile.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135616119
Thanks @lresende -- LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135616345
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135616422
@lresende I'm just retesting this as we merged a R style checker. I'm sure
this PR should be fine, but just want to run this through to make sure things
are working fin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135616551
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135616536
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135617402
[Test build #41718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41718/consoleFull)
for PR 8343 at commit
[`472c767`](https://gith
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7883#issuecomment-135617611
@shivaram thank you for merging it. I keep watching the Jenkins in a couple
of hours. If it will go well, I will inform the community about this lint
script.
---
If yo
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135617728
@yu-iskw I actually an error in Jenkins which says. I guess this is from
the PR that added na.omit to the NAMESPACE yesterday
```
Error in (function (classes, fd
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8362#issuecomment-135617983
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8362#issuecomment-135617993
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135617969
@shivaram I see. I'll investigate the cause. Thank you for letting me know.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135618028
[Test build #41714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41714/console)
for PR 8484 at commit
[`35371fb`](https://github.
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8494
[SPARK-10327][SQL] Cache Table is not working while subquery has alias in
its project list
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.HiveTableScan
sql("select key, v
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135618198
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8484#issuecomment-135618193
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8494#issuecomment-135618510
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8362#issuecomment-135619245
Implemented initial non-sparse HLL++. I am going to take a look at the
sparse version next week. The results are still equal to the Clearspring HLL+
implementation in
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135619437
I think I found the problem. Our `setGeneric` for `na.omit` is wrong. It is
being too restrictive. We need a diff which looks like
```
- function
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8494#issuecomment-135619597
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8494#issuecomment-135619546
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8362#issuecomment-135619890
[Test build #41719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41719/consoleFull)
for PR 8362 at commit
[`1ea722b`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8494#issuecomment-135620007
[Test build #41720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41720/consoleFull)
for PR 8494 at commit
[`bfd40d9`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135620132
[Test build #41718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41718/console)
for PR 8343 at commit
[`472c767`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135620319
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8343#issuecomment-135620315
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135620501
cc @yu-iskw
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user shivaram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495
[SPARKR] [SPARK-10328] Fix generic for na.omit
S3 function is at
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/stats/html/na.fail.html
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by ru
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135620750
Here is the output of some sample tests using hive 1.2.1
```
hive> select cast(null as string) in ('1', cast(null as string));
OK
NULL
Time taken: 0.042
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135620819
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135620803
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135620933
@yu-iskw I also found a minor bug in lint-r that I just fixed. Please let
me know if that is good. With this change lint-r passes on my machine
---
If your project is
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135621454
@shivaram All right. I am checking this on my local machine. Please give me
some minutes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135621545
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135621549
postgresql's output regarding `in`...
```
yhuai=# select cast(null as char(10)) in ('1', cast(null as char(10)));
?column?
--
(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135621561
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135621721
[Test build #41722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41722/consoleFull)
for PR 8495 at commit
[`4758a87`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135622468
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#issuecomment-135622466
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8458#issuecomment-135623380
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8492#issuecomment-135623342
OK. I guess the main question at here is if we want to have a different
semantic with hive on `array_contains` regarding `null`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8458#issuecomment-135623371
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8495#discussion_r38168825
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ setGeneric("dropna",
#' @rdname nafunctions
#' @export
setGeneric("na.omit",
--- End di
Github user jakajancar commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4549#issuecomment-135623856
@lepfhty Has any progress been made on this? Can you point me to a
PR/branch/JIRA issue/... that I can subscribe to?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
401 - 500 of 604 matches
Mail list logo
