Github user ewan-realitymine commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8512#issuecomment-137672455
This change is Hive specific, but could it also apply to Parquet files
stored on s3 with large numbers of part files?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8433#issuecomment-137673141
[Test build #1719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1719/consoleFull)
for PR 8433 at commit
[`0408404`](https://git
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8433#discussion_r38729165
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import java.util.{Collections, ArrayList => JArrayList,
List =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-137678830
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-137678811
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user jbonofre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598
SPARK-10445: Extend Maven version (enforcer)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbonofre/spark SPARK-10445
Alternatively you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598#issuecomment-137680516
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-137680766
[Test build #41995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41995/consoleFull)
for PR 8349 at commit
[`231c810`](https://gith
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599
[SPARK-10437][SQ] Support aggregation expressions in Order By
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10437
If an expression in `SortOrder` is a resolved one, such as `count(1)`, th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137683103
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137683078
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137684190
[Test build #41996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41996/consoleFull)
for PR 8599 at commit
[`452cfb5`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598#issuecomment-137684318
No, we require 3.3.3 explicitly to work around some problems with Maven
3.2. `build/mvn` downloads it for you though. Do you mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598#issuecomment-137684872
Allright, weird, as it works with Maven 3.2.5 for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jbonofre closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user vinodkc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8507#discussion_r38733907
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeansModel.scala ---
@@ -125,16 +126,19 @@ object KMeansModel extends Loader[KMeansModel] {
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598#issuecomment-137686197
Yeah it 99% works -- I recall that the problem was a little bit subtle,
some problem with dependencies or artifacts, and maybe only affects a small
number of use cases, b
Github user vinodkc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8507#issuecomment-137686626
@feynmanliang , I've removed case classes used for schema inference.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8598#issuecomment-137692450
It makes sense, thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600
[SPARK-10446][SQL] Support to specify join type when calling join with
usingColumns
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10446
Currently the method `join(right: DataFrame, using
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137695938
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137695988
[Test build #41997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41997/consoleFull)
for PR 8600 at commit
[`8ff97ed`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137695913
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rapen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4449#issuecomment-137697278
@danielhaviv , see tests in PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8433#issuecomment-137698769
[Test build #1719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1719/console)
for PR 8433 at commit
[`0408404`](https://github
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8433#issuecomment-137707108
Aside from possible removing those imports, yes, this looks good to me for
master/1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137708779
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137708683
[Test build #41996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41996/console)
for PR 8599 at commit
[`452cfb5`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137708777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-137709964
[Test build #41995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41995/console)
for PR 8349 at commit
[`231c810`](https://github.
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38742310
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/SimpleTextRelation.scala
---
@@ -112,11 +114,14 @@ class SimpleTextRelation(
val fi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-137710055
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8349#issuecomment-137710050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38742367
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +104,87 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ex
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38742692
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +104,87 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ex
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38742782
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +104,87 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ex
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38742485
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +104,87 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ex
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38742967
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +104,87 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ex
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-137714184
Generally looks good except for a few minor issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137715324
[Test build #41997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41997/console)
for PR 8600 at commit
[`8ff97ed`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137715358
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137715359
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user skyluc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8433#discussion_r38743996
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import java.util.{Collections, ArrayList => JArrayList,
List =
Github user evacchi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6356#issuecomment-137717489
@marmbrus I have brought this up to date. Might need fixes in order to
merge cleanly, though
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#discussion_r38745091
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends HiveCompari
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#discussion_r38745663
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/ScriptTransformation.scala
---
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ case class ScriptTransformation(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#discussion_r38745795
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/ScriptTransformation.scala
---
@@ -290,7 +300,9 @@ case class HiveScriptIOSchema (
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-137723720
@zhichao-li Could you please add a test case that explicit checks for the
output format of a transformation query?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-137725481
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-137725498
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#discussion_r38747088
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/ScriptTransformation.scala
---
@@ -328,23 +361,27 @@ case class HiveScriptIOSchema (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-137726639
[Test build #41998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41998/consoleFull)
for PR 8537 at commit
[`8660d0e`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-137726968
I'm not super familiar with the script transformation feature. If I
understand this problem correctly, in prior versions, we doesn't support
`RECORDREADER` or `RECORDW
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7520#issuecomment-137728254
@viirya Oh sorry. It would be nice if you ping me after you updated your PR
next time :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7971#discussion_r38748233
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkFunSuite.scala ---
@@ -44,5 +49,27 @@ private[spark] abstract class SparkFunSuite extends
FunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-137737040
[Test build #41998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41998/console)
for PR 8537 at commit
[`8660d0e`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-137737175
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-137737181
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-137745447
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-137745469
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137745960
Sorry Andrew, I certainly didn't mean to imply that I knew your opinion on
this particular patch -- as Sean said, I was just trying to point out the
general situation. M
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8402#issuecomment-137746771
[Test build #41999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41999/consoleFull)
for PR 8402 at commit
[`cfcf4e6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7971#issuecomment-137751364
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7971#issuecomment-137751393
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7971#issuecomment-137751981
[Test build #42000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42000/consoleFull)
for PR 7971 at commit
[`bc8f2be`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137752570
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137752519
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8600#issuecomment-137754680
[Test build #42001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42001/consoleFull)
for PR 8600 at commit
[`efe069a`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8509#discussion_r38760022
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -160,4 +101,168 @@ private[parquet] o
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8509#discussion_r38760227
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystRowConverter.scala
---
@@ -179,31 +154,7 @@ private[parquet] c
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8509#discussion_r38761117
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaSuite.scala
---
@@ -941,4 +942,313 @@ class ParquetSchema
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8512#issuecomment-137765159
@ewan-realitymine, yeah, that is @davies point about `HadoopFsRelation`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#discussion_r38762488
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#discussion_r38762581
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1519,6 +1519,19 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLC
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#discussion_r38764470
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1519,6 +1519,19 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCont
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8509#discussion_r38764680
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -160,4 +101,168 @@ private[parquet] o
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765752
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/libsvm/LibSVMRelation.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765912
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/source/JavaLibSVMRelationSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765946
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/LibSVMRelationSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765935
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/source/JavaLibSVMRelationSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765932
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/source/JavaLibSVMRelationSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765957
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/LibSVMRelationSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765918
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/source/JavaLibSVMRelationSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765954
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/LibSVMRelationSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#discussion_r3878
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#discussion_r38765916
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/ml/source/JavaLibSVMRelationSuite.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137778499
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137778493
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137778525
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137778526
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8599#issuecomment-137778681
[Test build #42003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42003/consoleFull)
for PR 8599 at commit
[`e65f4db`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137779452
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137779431
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137780768
[Test build #42004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42004/consoleFull)
for PR 8180 at commit
[`bb5190f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137781454
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137781457
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137781690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137781452
[Test build #42004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42004/console)
for PR 8180 at commit
[`bb5190f`](https://github.
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#discussion_r38769233
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +104,87 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest extend
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-137781689
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
1 - 100 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
