GitHub user calvinjia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9204
[SPARK-11236][CORE] Update Tachyon dependency from 0.7.1 -> 0.8.0.
Upgrades the tachyon-client version to the latest release.
No new dependencies are added and no spark facing APIs are cha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-15256
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-15244
**[Test build #44083 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44083/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
[`15ebb3b`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-15251
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-14732
**[Test build #44083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44083/consoleFull)**
for PR 9203 at commit
[`15ebb3b`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r42669119
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnTimelineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,765 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-149998301
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203#issuecomment-149998334
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JihongMA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#issuecomment-149997989
Seth, no need to implement the old interface, simply put a placeholder for
resolving it is sufficient, which will go away when this code path is removed.
here
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149997721
**[Test build #44082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44082/consoleFull)**
for PR 8972 at commit
[`d92c143`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r42668737
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnTimelineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,720 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9203
[SPARK-11243] [SQL] output UnsafeRow from columnar cache
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davies/spark unsafe_cache
Alternatively
Github user noel-smith commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8627#issuecomment-149997391
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149997313
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149997293
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202#issuecomment-149997285
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user rick-ibm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9202
[SPARK-10857] [SQL] Block SQL injection vulnerabilities under
DataFrameWriter.jdbc().
@marmbrus
@rxin
@joshrosen
@srowen
This patch attempts to address both
https://issues.apa
Github user JihongMA commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#discussion_r42668167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -857,3 +857,329 @@ object HyperLogLogPlusPl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9201#issuecomment-149996202
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149995526
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149995521
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user xguo27 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9201
[SPARK-11242][SQL] In conf/spark-env.sh.template SPARK_DRIVER_MEMORY is
documented incorrectly
Minor fix on the comment
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149995360
**[Test build #44080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44080/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
[`2c16ca8`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9197#issuecomment-149995300
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149995342
**[Test build #44081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44081/consoleFull)**
for PR 9199 at commit
[`d89931a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9197#issuecomment-149995302
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9197#issuecomment-149995104
**[Test build #44072 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44072/consoleFull)**
for PR 9197 at commit
[`a3246e5`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-149994494
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-149994496
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-149994326
**[Test build #44073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44073/consoleFull)**
for PR 9051 at commit
[`6d55ef8`](https://git
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#discussion_r42667047
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1048 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user djalova commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9186#issuecomment-149991651
@tdas it looks like Jenkins didn't retest
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149993000
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149993003
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149992916
**[Test build #44077 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44077/consoleFull)**
for PR 9183 at commit
[`d039f9a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149992387
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149992357
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#issuecomment-149991501
Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11238 for the
documentation change.
@shivaram @rxin - Would you, please, take a look at it ?
---
If your projec
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149990915
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JihongMA commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9003#discussion_r42665351
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/functions.scala
---
@@ -857,3 +857,329 @@ object HyperLogLogPlusPl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149990149
**[Test build #44080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44080/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
[`2c16ca8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9198#issuecomment-149989755
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9198#issuecomment-149989753
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9198#issuecomment-149989654
**[Test build #44070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44070/consoleFull)**
for PR 9198 at commit
[`8bf957e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149989430
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-149989384
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r42664614
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -17,6 +17,34 @@
# SQLcontext.R: SQLContext-driven functions
+#' Temporary function to reroute ol
Github user jayantshekhar commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149986723
Thanks @yinxusen following up on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-149984317
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-149985382
**[Test build #44079 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44079/consoleFull)**
for PR 9154 at commit
[`4394f00`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-149985191
**[Test build #44078 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44078/consoleFull)**
for PR 6291 at commit
[`fe5eab3`](https://gith
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r42662379
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -17,6 +17,34 @@
# SQLcontext.R: SQLContext-driven functions
+#' Temporary function to reroute ol
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-149984336
@jayantshekhar You can run the `dev/scalastyle` to check the scala style.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9154#issuecomment-149984278
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149983866
**[Test build #44077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44077/consoleFull)**
for PR 9183 at commit
[`d039f9a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-149983109
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-149983089
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6291#issuecomment-149982831
@kayousterhout DRY'd out the tests. @squito Take a quick look, if you
would -- the little bit of re-ordering in the tests should leave the logic
intact.
---
If yo
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9184#issuecomment-149979698
This looks great. I'm going to merge so that I can resolve any conflicts
with #9190. We can continue to address comments / TODOs in a follow up PR.
---
If your proje
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149981654
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149981692
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9123
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-149981212
**[Test build #44076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44076/consoleFull)**
for PR 8866 at commit
[`019b13e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-149980937
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9123#issuecomment-149980991
Thank you! Merging to master and 1.5 branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-149980939
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-149980692
**[Test build #44068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44068/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`a75931f`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9184
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149980248
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149978046
**[Test build #44075 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44075/consoleFull)**
for PR 9183 at commit
[`d039f9a`](https://git
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r42659746
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -17,6 +17,34 @@
# SQLcontext.R: SQLContext-driven functions
+#' Temporary function to reroute ol
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#discussion_r42659643
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -17,6 +17,34 @@
# SQLcontext.R: SQLContext-driven functions
+#' Temporary function to reroute ol
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-149979224
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9184#discussion_r42659562
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -446,3 +455,32 @@ case class MapObjects(
"""
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-149979221
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9184#discussion_r42659507
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9184#discussion_r42659452
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ClassEncoder.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-149979048
**[Test build #44074 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44074/consoleFull)**
for PR 8866 at commit
[`21048d9`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-149978900
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149978890
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8866#issuecomment-149978926
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9200#issuecomment-149978880
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149978056
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149978054
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srutis commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149978215
Sruti S
9:29 AM (4 hours ago)
to Shagun
A quick look through the source of FunctionRegistry.scala seems to
indicate that the function is miss
Github user shagunsodhani commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149977083
@rxin :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149976897
@shagunsodhani can you change the title to "[SPARK-11233][SQL] register
cosh in function registry".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199#issuecomment-149976810
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
GitHub user huitseeker opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9200
[SPARK-8835] Provide pluggable Congestion Strategies for Receiver-based
Streams
The new (destructive) strategies avoid leaving elements in the TCP buffer,
leading to breakages at the sender leve
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9167
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user shagunsodhani opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9199
fixes SPARK-11233: registered cosh is in function registry
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shagunsodhani/spark proposed-fi
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9167#issuecomment-149974095
Thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149972202
**[Test build #44075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44075/consoleFull)**
for PR 9183 at commit
[`d039f9a`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9195#issuecomment-149972062
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9194#issuecomment-149971619
You should also be able to add a test in `CliSuite`.
Regarding the Hive Version concern. I believe this is only going to touch
the execution version of Hive (a
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9194#discussion_r42654708
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala
---
@@ -308,7 +310,15 @@ private[hive] clas
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149969291
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183#issuecomment-149969265
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9194#issuecomment-149968780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
501 - 600 of 790 matches
Mail list logo
