Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9240#issuecomment-150512794
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9240#issuecomment-150512844
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9217
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9217#issuecomment-150511744
Thanks. I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7841#issuecomment-150511647
@aray Thanks a lot for updating this. To help api design, can you take a
look at other frameworks and see what their signatures look like?
---
If your project is set up f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9217#issuecomment-150511031
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9217#issuecomment-150511033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9217#issuecomment-150510875
**[Test build #44207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44207/consoleFull)**
for PR 9217 at commit
[`9ff3f66`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8684#issuecomment-150507472
**[Test build #44214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44214/consoleFull)**
for PR 8684 at commit
[`e1e75a5`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9243#issuecomment-150506790
**[Test build #44213 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44213/consoleFull)**
for PR 9243 at commit
[`392975d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8684#issuecomment-150506081
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9245#issuecomment-150506040
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8684#issuecomment-150506121
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9244#issuecomment-150506052
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user stephend-realitymine opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9245
[SPARK-10947] [SQL] With schema inference from JSON into a Dataframe, add
option to infer all primitive object types as strings
Currently, when a schema is inferred from a JSON fil
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9243#issuecomment-150505415
Why is an uncompressed bitset using less space than a compressed one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150505202
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150505200
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user SemMulder opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9244
[SPARK-11276][CORE] SizeEstimator prevents class unloading
The SizeEstimator keeps a cache of ClassInfos but this cache uses Class
objects as keys.
Which results in strong references to the Cl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150504956
**[Test build #44212 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44212/consoleFull)**
for PR 9109 at commit
[`8557977`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9170#issuecomment-150504857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9170#issuecomment-150504855
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9170#issuecomment-150504667
**[Test build #44208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44208/consoleFull)**
for PR 9170 at commit
[`65f0a4c`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9242
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9243#issuecomment-150504119
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9243#issuecomment-150504102
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9242#issuecomment-150503566
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9243
[SPARK-11271][Core] Use Spark BitSet instead of RoaringBitmap to reduce
memory usage
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11271
As reported in the JIRA ticket, when there are to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150501534
**[Test build #44212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44212/consoleFull)**
for PR 9109 at commit
[`8557977`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-150500253
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150500190
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-150500153
**[Test build #44199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44199/consoleFull)**
for PR 9210 at commit
[`11d9092`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-150500252
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150500211
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#discussion_r42840074
--- Diff: docs/_plugins/include_example.rb ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+require 'liquid'
+require 'pygments'
+
+module Jekyll
+ class IncludeExa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9240#issuecomment-150497226
**[Test build #44211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44211/consoleFull)**
for PR 9240 at commit
[`906845b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9240#issuecomment-150496706
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9240#issuecomment-150496694
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-150496646
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-150496647
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9210#issuecomment-150496548
**[Test build #44200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44200/consoleFull)**
for PR 9210 at commit
[`418b472`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9127#issuecomment-150496567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9127#issuecomment-150496568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9127#issuecomment-150496521
**[Test build #44209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44209/consoleFull)**
for PR 9127 at commit
[`e874a45`](https://git
Github user FRosner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9222#issuecomment-150494394
@sun-rui so there is an existing R test case for this method? In the end I
just did a refactoring so existing tests should not break.
The idea of unit tests howe
Github user FRosner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9222#issuecomment-150494201
@felixcheung the ticket is mentioning two numbers
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11258#) in the description. For a
small data frame it is already a speedup
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#discussion_r42838196
--- Diff: docs/_plugins/include_example.rb ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+require 'liquid'
+require 'pygments'
+
+module Jekyll
+ class IncludeExamp
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#issuecomment-150493909
Yes, it looks good. Please remove the example, add Apache header, then
remove `[POC]` from the PR title. It should be good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9109#discussion_r42838120
--- Diff: docs/_plugins/include_example.rb ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+require 'liquid'
--- End diff --
Could you add Apache header? See `copy_api_di
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9127#issuecomment-150493422
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9127#issuecomment-150493424
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9127#issuecomment-150493379
**[Test build #44205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44205/consoleFull)**
for PR 9127 at commit
[`a7e8320`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9239
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
701 - 753 of 753 matches
Mail list logo
