Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153501829
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8531#issuecomment-153501486
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43812681
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -488,7 +491,12 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43813114
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153506641
**[Test build #44963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44963/consoleFull)**
for PR 9446 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153507504
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9440#issuecomment-153512622
cc @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9449
[SPARK-11490][SQL] variance should alias var_samp instead of var_pop.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark SPARK-11490
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9434#discussion_r43820137
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -499,6 +499,15 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
new Dataset[T](this,
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43820035
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -499,6 +499,10 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
new Dataset[T](this,
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43820849
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -37,3 +35,39 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43820879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -37,3 +35,39 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#issuecomment-153517822
It would be really great to also try and create a test suite that uses java
8 lambdas (though we may need to pull this into a separate PR as I'm not sure
how many
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450
[SPARK-11491] Update build to use Scala 2.10.5
Spark should build against Scala 2.10.5, since that includes a fix for
Scaladoc that will fix doc snapshot publishing:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153518606
**[Test build #44969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44969/consoleFull)**
for PR 9450 at commit
GitHub user vidma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9451
WIP: Optimize Inner joins with skewed null values
Draft of first step in optimizing skew in joins (it is quite common to have
skew in data, and lots of `nulls` on either side of join is quite common
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153496072
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9424#issuecomment-153496189
Going to merge this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43811146
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43811779
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43811640
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8531#issuecomment-153501196
**[Test build #44950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44950/consoleFull)**
for PR 8531 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446
[SPARK-11489][SQL] Only include common first order statistics in GroupedData
We added a bunch of 2nd order statistics such as skewness and kurtosis to
GroupedData. I don't think they are common enough
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#discussion_r43813063
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GroupedData.scala ---
@@ -316,86 +264,48 @@ class GroupedData protected[sql](
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153502185
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153502213
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#discussion_r43813023
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GroupedData.scala ---
@@ -316,86 +264,48 @@ class GroupedData protected[sql](
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153503614
**[Test build #44962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44962/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447#issuecomment-153506808
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447#issuecomment-153506821
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153508301
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153508491
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153508426
**[Test build #44962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44962/consoleFull)**
for PR 8984 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#issuecomment-153508492
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153509355
**[Test build #44966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44966/consoleFull)**
for PR 9448 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9403#issuecomment-153509437
**[Test build #44956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44956/consoleFull)**
for PR 9403 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153509047
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9385#discussion_r43817697
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1019,7 +1019,16 @@ class Analyzer(
* scoping
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3816#issuecomment-153513026
I think this is the right fix. However, more pairs of eyes on this change
would be better.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43820335
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -499,6 +499,10 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
new Dataset[T](this,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153518428
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43821203
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -37,3 +35,39 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153518050
/cc @srowen @pwendell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9434#issuecomment-153518772
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43810862
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43810744
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9445#issuecomment-153499217
**[Test build #44960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44960/consoleFull)**
for PR 9445 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9422#issuecomment-153500624
For stddev/variance, it's clear that using ImerativeAggregate will be
faster. Then we don't have case that need the MutableProject to be atomic,
should we revert this
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153500615
@davies, @yhuai: I tried taking two sample regression test queries that you
listed here and putting them into AggregationQuerySuite, which should
automatically
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153501959
So, you tried `TungstenAggregationQueryWithControlledFallbackSuite` and it
did not fail?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153502212
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153502172
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153503203
I tried with master, it did failed with the sam exception:
```
[info] *** 1 TEST FAILED ***
[error] Failed: Total 6, Failed 1, Errors 0, Passed 5
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43813962
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153504056
**[Test build #44961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44961/consoleFull)**
for PR 9446 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43814406
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -441,6 +537,17 @@ class Dataset[T] private(
/** Collects the elements to an
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153506241
Yep, confirmed and reproduced. If we just wanted to address that bug, we
could do something like #9447, but I think the broader set of changes here are
a good idea.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153507966
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153507926
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153507883
**[Test build #44961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44961/consoleFull)**
for PR 9446 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153507933
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153507942
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153507945
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447#issuecomment-153508899
**[Test build #44964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44964/consoleFull)**
for PR 9447 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9448#issuecomment-153509074
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-153509965
**[Test build #44965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44965/consoleFull)**
for PR 9344 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9421#discussion_r43817473
--- Diff:
extras/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisCheckpointState.scala
---
@@ -16,39 +16,77 @@
*/
package
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9336#issuecomment-153512190
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3816#issuecomment-153513337
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9449#issuecomment-153514954
Note that this also includes changes from #9446. Look at the last commit
for diff.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153496037
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9429#discussion_r43811041
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -205,45 +205,30 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43811813
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8531#issuecomment-153501491
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153501309
cc @davies @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#discussion_r43812669
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GroupedData.scala ---
@@ -26,42 +26,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions._
import
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9143#discussion_r43814263
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/BatchedWriteAheadLog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153504632
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9383#issuecomment-153504624
There was a problem in my test-selection regex... trying again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9446#issuecomment-153504587
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9313#issuecomment-153505891
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9313#issuecomment-153505715
**[Test build #44952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44952/consoleFull)**
for PR 9313 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9313#issuecomment-153505892
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9447
[SPARK-11486][SQL] Fix TungstenAggregate's handling of empty agg buffers
during fallback
This fixes an issue where TungstenAggregate would extract the wrong
aggregation buffer columns when
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-153506214
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-153506072
**[Test build #44951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44951/consoleFull)**
for PR 9206 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9206#issuecomment-153506212
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3816#issuecomment-153512508
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9422#issuecomment-153513069
ah sorry just saw this message. Since the changed behavior is easier to
reason about, let's keep it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3816#issuecomment-153513322
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9449#issuecomment-153515606
**[Test build #44968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44968/consoleFull)**
for PR 9449 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r43820397
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -441,6 +537,17 @@ class Dataset[T] private(
/** Collects the elements to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9450#issuecomment-153518453
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8984#discussion_r43797767
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/types.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor license
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9443#issuecomment-153468251
**[Test build #44948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44948/consoleFull)**
for PR 9443 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9438#issuecomment-153467262
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8531#issuecomment-153471179
**[Test build #44950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44950/consoleFull)**
for PR 8531 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9317#issuecomment-153471074
Hi @zsxwing , could you take a look at this? There have been some
superficial test failures, but the last one in CoarseMesosSchedulerBackendSuite
looks like it
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7753#discussion_r43801975
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/ExecutorMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9444
Fix typo in WebUI
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaceklaskowski/spark TImely-fix
Alternatively you can review and
301 - 400 of 973 matches
Mail list logo
