Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162960098
Hey, quick Q.: how do we make sure that the bad version of the dependency
(under a different org / artifact ID) doesn't get pulled in transitively and
wind up taking
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#issuecomment-162958058
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#issuecomment-162957869
**[Test build #47339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47339/consoleFull)**
for PR 10133 at commit
[`b73f3c9`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#issuecomment-162958060
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user keypointt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107#issuecomment-162957856
hi @squito now tests passed, what should I do next?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9427#issuecomment-162948361
[Test build #47344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47344/consoleFull)
for PR 9427 at commit
[`1d35e6f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162948210
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162947991
**[Test build #47341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47341/consoleFull)**
for PR 9057 at commit
[`b17491d`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162948208
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#discussion_r46981968
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQ
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10202#issuecomment-162946298
**[Test build #47343 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47343/consoleFull)**
for PR 10202 at commit
[`8a3f555`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9427#issuecomment-162945042
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9427#issuecomment-162945020
tes this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10203#issuecomment-162944589
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user jbonofre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10203
SPARK-11193 - Hack to support SynchronizedMap trait in Kryo serializer
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbonofre/spark SPARK-11
GitHub user aray opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10202
[SPARK-12205][SQL] Pivot fails Analysis when aggregate is UnresolvedFunction
Delays application of ResolvePivot until all aggregates are resolved to
prevent problems with UnresolvedFunction and adds u
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10163#issuecomment-162942024
**[Test build #47342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47342/consoleFull)**
for PR 10163 at commit
[`c81aa46`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10197#issuecomment-162934829
**[Test build #47340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47340/consoleFull)**
for PR 10197 at commit
[`a397662`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162934620
**[Test build #47341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47341/consoleFull)**
for PR 9057 at commit
[`b17491d`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10197#issuecomment-162931179
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#issuecomment-162930506
**[Test build #47339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47339/consoleFull)**
for PR 10133 at commit
[`b73f3c9`](https://gi
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#issuecomment-162928988
The most recent commit should fix the build failure, but it's probably too
hacky :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162921638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162921419
**[Test build #47337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47337/consoleFull)**
for PR 10174 at commit
[`707ab3d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162921640
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#discussion_r46966053
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -359,10 +359,27 @@ case class LambdaVariable(value: S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10197#issuecomment-162904333
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10197#issuecomment-162904331
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10023#issuecomment-162891662
**[Test build #2181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10023 at commit
[`3cafda5`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162888281
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162890394
**[Test build #47337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47337/consoleFull)**
for PR 10174 at commit
[`707ab3d`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-162888285
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9923#issuecomment-162885919
IIUC, http server is useless once we remove akka? Can you add a line of
comment there as well?
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8513#issuecomment-162885645
**[Test build #2182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2182/consoleFull)**
for PR 8513 at commit
[`c125c3b`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9923#discussion_r46954341
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/netty/NettyStreamManager.scala ---
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ private[netty] class NettyStreamManager(rpcEnv:
NettyRpc
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9923#discussion_r46954401
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -179,6 +179,24 @@ private[spark] trait RpcEnvFileServer {
*/
def addJar(file
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9923#discussion_r46954272
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/netty/NettyStreamManager.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +42,10 @@ private[netty] class NettyStreamManager(rpcEnv:
NettyRp
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9923#discussion_r46954224
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/netty/NettyStreamManager.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +42,10 @@ private[netty] class NettyStreamManager(rpcEnv:
NettyRp
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162884712
I'm going to merge this shortly as a sort of 'hot fix', though it doesn't
fix anything -- the original PR was an improvement but didn't actually have an
effect.
---
If
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9923#discussion_r46954012
--- Diff:
repl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoader.scala ---
@@ -90,6 +94,11 @@ class ExecutorClassLoader(conf: SparkConf, classUri:
String
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162881131
**[Test build #2180 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2180/consoleFull)**
for PR 10198 at commit
[`6711c9c`](https://
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10129#issuecomment-162880724
@tgravescs I have made the changes, Please have a look into this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8513#issuecomment-162874704
**[Test build #2182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2182/consoleFull)**
for PR 8513 at commit
[`c125c3b`](https://git
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8513#discussion_r46948787
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Word2VecSuite.scala ---
@@ -131,7 +131,42 @@ class Word2VecSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLlibTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-162867871
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-162867873
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-162867660
**[Test build #47335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47335/consoleFull)**
for PR 10201 at commit
[`e4372d6`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10133#discussion_r46947151
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -359,10 +359,27 @@ case class LambdaVariable(value: S
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10086#discussion_r46946121
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -151,13 +151,27 @@ Spark on Mesos also supports cluster mode, where the
driver is launched in the c
can find th
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10086#discussion_r46946072
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -151,13 +151,27 @@ Spark on Mesos also supports cluster mode, where the
driver is launched in the c
can find th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-162864236
**[Test build #47335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47335/consoleFull)**
for PR 10201 at commit
[`e4372d6`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10023#issuecomment-162864287
**[Test build #2181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10023 at commit
[`3cafda5`](https://g
GitHub user sun-rui opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201
[SPARK-12204][SPARKR] Implement drop method for DataFrame in SparkR.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sun-rui/spark SPARK-12204
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9748#issuecomment-162860246
@davies here are some problems when deserialize for RoaringBitmap. see the
examples below:
run this piece of code
```
import com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.{Input
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162860159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162860155
**[Test build #47334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47334/consoleFull)**
for PR 9057 at commit
[`5a89d9d`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162860161
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162859323
**[Test build #47334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47334/consoleFull)**
for PR 9057 at commit
[`5a89d9d`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10188#issuecomment-162857586
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9057#issuecomment-162856962
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10200#issuecomment-162856544
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10200#issuecomment-162856543
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10199#issuecomment-162856000
Spurious failure:
```
ERROR: Timeout after 15 minutes
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162855530
**[Test build #2180 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2180/consoleFull)**
for PR 10198 at commit
[`6711c9c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10199#issuecomment-162855436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10199#issuecomment-162855435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002#issuecomment-162854335
Hit some network issue, just reverted this PR from master and branch-1.6 in
#10200.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10200#issuecomment-162854179
Merged to master and branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10157#issuecomment-162853865
@KaiXinXiaoLei do you mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162853196
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10200#issuecomment-162853092
I'm merging this to bring back master build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162853197
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10200
Revert PR #10002 "[SPARK-11551][DOC][EXAMPLE] Replace example code in
ml-features.md using include_example"
This reverts PR #10002, commit 78209b0ccaf3f22b5e2345dfb2b98edfdb746819.
The o
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162852487
Don't know why it fails on Jenkins but passes on local.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9756
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002#issuecomment-162852362
@somideshmukh I give you another PR to fix the Python style issue:
https://github.com/somideshmukh/spark/pull/3. After merging it, we can call
jenkins testing once her
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10172
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9756#issuecomment-162851874
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162851650
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
GitHub user dragos opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10199
[SPARK-12202][REPL] Parse Scala command line arguments
..and pass them to the underlying REPL engine (only for Scala 2.11)
Fixes SPARK-12202
You can merge this pull request into a Git repos
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162851649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10159#issuecomment-162851641
Just removing the warning seems pretty harmless, and I am fairly confident
it's the right thing to do given the JIRA. I'm going to merge later today.
---
If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-162851617
**[Test build #47330 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47330/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`1ca2efc`](https://git
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10172#issuecomment-162851366
Merged to master/1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10132
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user XuTingjun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198#issuecomment-162851296
LGTM, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10132#issuecomment-162850990
Merged to master/1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10185#issuecomment-162849808
**[Test build #2179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2179/consoleFull)**
for PR 10185 at commit
[`21d7bcd`](https://
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9731#issuecomment-162849867
Seehttps://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10198
[SPARK-11652] [CORE] Remote code execution with InvokerTransformer
Fix commons-collection group ID to commons-collections for version 3.x
Patches earlier PR at https://github.com/apache/spar
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10002#issuecomment-162848273
Sorry for that, I will help fixing them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10196#issuecomment-162846435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10196#issuecomment-162846432
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10196#issuecomment-162846309
**[Test build #47325 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47325/consoleFull)**
for PR 10196 at commit
[`2081673`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9940#issuecomment-162843069
@liancheng Sure. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10195#issuecomment-162842892
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10195#issuecomment-162842895
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
601 - 700 of 769 matches
Mail list logo
