Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164370649
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164370651
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164370532
**[Test build #47647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47647/consoleFull)**
for PR 10201 at commit
[`14215d3`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#issuecomment-164369953
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171#issuecomment-164369645
To avoid the interference of user loaded packages for this test, we may:
1. Add --vanilla option to R when running tests;
2. or is it possible to pick only confli
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10244#issuecomment-164369503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10244#issuecomment-164369500
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10244#issuecomment-164369418
**[Test build #47644 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47644/consoleFull)**
for PR 10244 at commit
[`3c1d982`](https://g
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289
[SPARK-12311][CORE] Restore previous value of "os.arch" property in test
suites after forcing to set specific value to "os.arch" property
Restore the original value of os.arch property after each tes
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164368190
**[Test build #47647 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47647/consoleFull)**
for PR 10201 at commit
[`14215d3`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164368067
**[Test build #47645 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47645/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`ad24010`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288#issuecomment-164367756
**[Test build #47646 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47646/consoleFull)**
for PR 10288 at commit
[`9971300`](https://gi
Github user winningsix commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164366860
Hi @vanzin, could you help me review the updated patches? In the updated
patch, the following changes come:
1. I added test for shuffle encryption with compressio
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10244#issuecomment-164366213
**[Test build #47644 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47644/consoleFull)**
for PR 10244 at commit
[`3c1d982`](https://gi
Github user winningsix commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r47466929
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnShuffleEncryptionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user yucai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164365408
@yhuai sure, I will do that ASAP.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10244#issuecomment-164365254
@jkbradley thank you for reviewing it. I modified some a few points. Can
you review it again?
- Include the import statments of JavaKMeansExample in the doc
- Si
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164365167
@yucai can you create a 1.5 backport for this one? There was a conflict
when I tried to merge it to branch 1.5. It will be good to have a pr for the
backport and make sur
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164364398
Thanks! Merging to 1.5, 1.6, and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47466167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -246,85 +260,238 @@ object SpecifiedWindowFrame
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47465939
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -736,15 +691,148 @@ private[execution] final class
UnboundedFollowing
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164361133
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164360991
**[Test build #47642 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47642/consoleFull)**
for PR 10265 at commit
[`1b8d570`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164361130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47465844
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -246,85 +260,238 @@ object SpecifiedWindowF
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164360720
Cool. I am merging this one to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47465641
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -246,85 +260,238 @@ object SpecifiedWindowF
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164359997
**[Test build #47643 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47643/consoleFull)**
for PR 10201 at commit
[`e6e9f10`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164360023
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164360026
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47465384
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1097,6 +1118,42 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#issuecomment-164359275
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#discussion_r47465230
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -263,6 +265,10 @@ case class Except(left: SparkPlan, right: Sp
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164358418
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10283#discussion_r47465100
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -604,7 +606,9 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
val className = bean
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164358420
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164358352
**[Test build #47640 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47640/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`2b3220a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288#issuecomment-164358201
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288#issuecomment-164358206
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288#issuecomment-164358154
**[Test build #47641 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47641/consoleFull)**
for PR 10288 at commit
[`d8722bb`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10283#discussion_r47464971
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -937,8 +937,9 @@ object DecimalAggregates extends Rul
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164357016
**[Test build #47643 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47643/consoleFull)**
for PR 10201 at commit
[`e6e9f10`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164356726
@yhuai LGTM. Yea, lets merge this one, I'll create a ticket for the
distinct rules
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#discussion_r47464659
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/RowFormatConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -58,6 +58,48 @@ class RowFormatConvertersSuite extends
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164356661
@felixcheung, @shivaram, documentation for withColumn changed. please take
a review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#discussion_r47464584
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -263,6 +265,10 @@ case class Except(left: SparkPlan, right: Spark
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47464485
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +121,19 @@ sealed trait FrameBoundary {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47464465
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -70,15 +70,32 @@ trait CheckAnalysis {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#discussion_r47464475
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -263,6 +265,10 @@ case class Except(left: SparkPlan, right: Sp
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47464437
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -70,15 +70,32 @@ trait CheckAnalysis {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9819#discussion_r47464278
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -736,15 +691,156 @@ private[execution] final class
UnboundedFollowingWind
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164351154
Merging to master & 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user zjffdu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10242#issuecomment-164351234
@yanboliang Could you help review it ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user mwws commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#discussion_r47463413
--- Diff: streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/Demo.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
--- End diff --
Yes, I will remove this file a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164346090
**[Test build #47642 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47642/consoleFull)**
for PR 10265 at commit
[`1b8d570`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164344648
When merge this, let's also merge it to branch 1.5, 1.6, and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164344594
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164344218
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164344211
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288#issuecomment-164344002
**[Test build #47641 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47641/consoleFull)**
for PR 10288 at commit
[`d8722bb`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10281#issuecomment-164343894
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10281#issuecomment-164343893
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10281#issuecomment-164343853
**[Test build #47638 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47638/consoleFull)**
for PR 10281 at commit
[`50d442e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-164343732
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-164343734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10286#issuecomment-164343601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-164343681
**[Test build #47639 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47639/consoleFull)**
for PR 9952 at commit
[`7c36c1d`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10286#issuecomment-164343602
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10286#issuecomment-164343546
**[Test build #47635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47635/consoleFull)**
for PR 10286 at commit
[`ff9d8b2`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288#issuecomment-164343229
@simplyianm @srowen I create this PR based on #10043. Please see
https://github.com/yhuai/spark/commit/d8722bb30d347fa97c7d358284eb433edb1be6ec
for my change. This PR s
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10288
[SPARK-12057] [SQL] Prevent failure on corrupt JSON records
This PR makes JSON parser and schema inference handle more cases where we
have unparsed records. It is based on #10043. The last commit fix
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10287#issuecomment-164342853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10287#issuecomment-164342850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10287#issuecomment-164342804
**[Test build #47636 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47636/consoleFull)**
for PR 10287 at commit
[`eacb4ea`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164342801
**[Test build #47640 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47640/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`2b3220a`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-164342390
**[Test build #47639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47639/consoleFull)**
for PR 9952 at commit
[`7c36c1d`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10281#issuecomment-164342424
**[Test build #47638 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47638/consoleFull)**
for PR 10281 at commit
[`50d442e`](https://gi
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-164341602
Oh, I'm terribly sorry about that. Pushing the update was failed
- Modified what you pointed out
- Add a Java example and its doc
---
If your project is set
Github user yucai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164339684
@andrewor14 , @yhuai could you kindly help re-trigger testing? Much thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164334538
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164334536
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164334532
**[Test build #47637 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47637/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`f88f011`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-164334418
**[Test build #47637 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47637/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`f88f011`](https://gith
Github user mindprince commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10180#issuecomment-164333244
Can someone review this or if it seems okay, merge it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#issuecomment-164333106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#issuecomment-164333105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10285#issuecomment-164333027
**[Test build #47633 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47633/consoleFull)**
for PR 10285 at commit
[`cbb2c59`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10286#issuecomment-164332710
**[Test build #47635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47635/consoleFull)**
for PR 10286 at commit
[`ff9d8b2`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10287#issuecomment-164332700
**[Test build #47636 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47636/consoleFull)**
for PR 10287 at commit
[`eacb4ea`](https://gi
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10281#discussion_r47458826
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1448,23 +1457,28 @@ test_that("write.df() on DataFrame and works with
read.parquet", {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10283#issuecomment-164332095
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10283#issuecomment-164332075
**[Test build #47634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47634/consoleFull)**
for PR 10283 at commit
[`a0a991a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10283#issuecomment-164332096
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10287#issuecomment-164331892
Actually the test for this PR is not correctly being tested with the result
but I just added it just like the other predicate tests. I will correct the
test as soon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10286#issuecomment-164331911
Actually the test for this PR is not correctly being tested with the result
but I just added it just like the other predicate tests. I will correct the
test as soon
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10287
[SPARK-12315][SQL] isnotnull operator not pushed down for JDBC datasource.
`IsNotNull` filter is not being pushed down for JDBC datasource.
It looks it is SQL standard according to
[SQ
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10281#discussion_r47458635
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -371,13 +371,13 @@ test_that("Collect DataFrame with complex types", {
expect_equal(bob$h
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
