Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167063931
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167063910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167063911
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167063904
**[Test build #48291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48291/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
[`fcb5af9`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167063932
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167063848
**[Test build #48290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48290/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
[`40d52c9`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10468#issuecomment-167061262
**[Test build #48297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48297/consoleFull)**
for PR 10468 at commit
[`7f0a2e6`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061036
**[Test build #48288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48288/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061069
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10468
[SPARK-12409][SPARK-12387][SPARK-12391][SQL] Support AND/OR/IN/LIKE
push-down filters for JDBC
This is rework from #10386 and add more tests and LIKE push-down support.
You can merge this pull requ
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167060473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167060472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48400022
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin extend
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167060381
**[Test build #48287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48287/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
[`8d5710a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167060213
**[Test build #48293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48293/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
[`3fb9199`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10402#issuecomment-167060193
**[Test build #48294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48294/consoleFull)**
for PR 10402 at commit
[`cf58954`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#issuecomment-167059780
**[Test build #48296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48296/consoleFull)**
for PR 10330 at commit
[`fdc0097`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-167059552
**[Test build #48295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48295/consoleFull)**
for PR 8915 at commit
[`592ed63`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#discussion_r48399567
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -200,6 +204,10 @@ case class TakeOrderedAndProject(
proj
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10272#issuecomment-167059047
Current implementation still outperforms the one from
https://github.com/utcompling/Scalabha/blob/master/src/main/scala/opennlp/scalabha/lang/eng/PorterStemmer.scala,
by
Github user zhichao-li commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-167058985
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9350#issuecomment-167058892
**[Test build #48292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48292/consoleFull)**
for PR 9350 at commit
[`c2363aa`](https://gith
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9350#issuecomment-167056743
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9589#discussion_r48398910
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientWrapper.scala ---
@@ -151,29 +152,34 @@ private[hive] class ClientWrapper(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167056106
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167056107
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167056049
**[Test build #48286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48286/consoleFull)**
for PR 10463 at commit
[`8157ee0`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167055194
**[Test build #48291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48291/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
[`fcb5af9`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992#issuecomment-167055004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992#issuecomment-167055003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992#issuecomment-167054764
**[Test build #48289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48289/consoleFull)**
for PR 9992 at commit
[`de8f4c7`](https://git
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-167052293
@squito @mridulm I am afraid an additional state can not help here, your
use case requires "TaskSet related nodeBlacklist" which is not supported with
current implementatio
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167051327
**[Test build #48290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48290/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
[`40d52c9`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167050976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167050979
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167050810
**[Test build #48285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48285/consoleFull)**
for PR 10463 at commit
[`8157ee0`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9992#issuecomment-167048778
**[Test build #48289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48289/consoleFull)**
for PR 9992 at commit
[`de8f4c7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10467#issuecomment-167047758
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167047677
**[Test build #48288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48288/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://gi
GitHub user yuzhanghan1982 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10467
Branch 1.6
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dukedbgroup/spark branch-1.6
Alternatively you can review and apply these ch
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167046672
**[Test build #48287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48287/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
[`8d5710a`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167046527
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167046506
```
[info] PostgresIntegrationSuite:
[info] Exception encountered when attempting to run a suite with class
name: org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.PostgresIntegrationSuit
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167045790
@HyukjinKwon Anyway, I added a test by reflecting this discussion. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167045672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167045673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167045613
**[Test build #48282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48282/consoleFull)**
for PR 10465 at commit
[`d68f856`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044665
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044664
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044643
**[Test build #48283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48283/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466#issuecomment-167044424
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466#issuecomment-167044425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466#issuecomment-167044370
**[Test build #48284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48284/consoleFull)**
for PR 10466 at commit
[`6a0efed`](https://g
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167044200
@maropu I agree that can be another way! but I just think an interface
should be inclusive not exclusive. Handing in `ParquetRelation` might mean
other datasources
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167043478
**[Test build #48286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48286/consoleFull)**
for PR 10463 at commit
[`8157ee0`](https://gi
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167043114
add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4399#issuecomment-167042951
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167042504
**[Test build #48285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48285/consoleFull)**
for PR 10463 at commit
[`8157ee0`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48395965
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin ex
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167042310
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167042309
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167042286
**[Test build #48281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48281/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
[`e4d7b82`](https://g
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167042101
Adding a special handing for Parquet is better? I think that required
columns for push-down filters should be passed to each data sources, and this
is a more natural wa
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167041948
LGTM as well. Could you add testcases for this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466#issuecomment-167041784
**[Test build #48284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48284/consoleFull)**
for PR 10466 at commit
[`6a0efed`](https://gi
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167041637
ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466
[SPARK-12375] [ML] add handleinvalid for vectorindexer
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12375
>"Add option for allowing unknown categories, probably via a parameter like
"allowU
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167040023
And you are right I think the comments I said is not related with this PR.
Let's wait for their comments!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167039831
If this patch merged, the comment below is not suitable for `JDBCRelation`.
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039814
**[Test build #48279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48279/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`5011926`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039837
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167039644
@maropu I believe it is a Parquet stuff. AFAIK, the columns in filters
should be set to `requestedSchema` for Parquet. But
[this](https://github.com/apache/spark/bl
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167039229
@HyukjinKwon ISTM the root problem is that catalyst cannot fill required
columns on-the-fly for data sources. `unhandleFilters` is little related to the
problem.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167038901
**[Test build #48282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48282/consoleFull)**
for PR 10465 at commit
[`d68f856`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167038607
**[Test build #48283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48283/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://gi
Github user guoxu1231 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464#issuecomment-167038464
Not sure why 2 commits in this PR? Do I need t re-submit this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465
[SPARK-12515][SQL][DOC] minor doc update for read.jdbc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/felixcheung/spark dfreaderjdbcdoc
A
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167037408
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167037407
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167037362
**[Test build #48277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48277/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
[`56d14cf`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167036143
**[Test build #48281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48281/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
[`e4d7b82`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464#issuecomment-167036016
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user guoxu1231 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464
[SPARK-12513] [Streaming] SocketReceiver hang in Netcat example
Close client side socket connection before restart socket receiver.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runnin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167035310
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167035311
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167035212
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463
[SPARK-12502][Build][Python] Script /dev/run-tests fails when IBM Java is
used
fix an exception with IBM JDK by removing update field from a JavaVersion
tuple. This is because IBM JDK does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10462#issuecomment-167035224
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user yaooqinn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10462
[Core] remove redundant collection conversion.
remove redundant collection conversion.
Array toArray
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull http
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033952
**[Test build #48274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48274/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
[`207ca84`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-167033940
@cloud-fan @marmbrus Are you ok for latest updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48393687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin ext
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167033459
**[Test build #48279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48279/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`5011926`](https://gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167033198
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033099
**[Test build #48272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48272/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
[`f12cbb6`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033130
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
