Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10581
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10514
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user avulanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#issuecomment-169143891
@jkbradley Thanks for explanation! With regards to this particular PR, Do I
understand correct, that you don't want to add a new feature to the
soon-to-be-deprecated
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-169145624
**[Test build #48792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48792/consoleFull)**
for PR 10452 at commit
Github user iyounus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10274#discussion_r48902276
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -86,6 +86,22 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#issuecomment-169134436
There has been a lot of confusion about the spark.ml vs spark.mllib APIs,
so we want to achieve feature parity in spark.ml. There are no set plans to
deprecate
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10579#issuecomment-169135214
Merged into master and 1.5, 1.6 branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10510#issuecomment-169135396
@davies that makes sense, I've updated the change to just add a `.copy()`,
thanks for the suggestion.
@HyukjinKwon I think I understand the point of
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10579
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-169135841
Understood it. Thank you! Will not introduce new APIs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r48897039
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -169,18 +169,3 @@ object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r48897156
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -212,22 +212,47 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9267
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10581#issuecomment-169140437
LGTM, except one minor comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10594#issuecomment-169140841
**[Test build #2329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2329/consoleFull)**
for PR 10594 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-169141968
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-169141963
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10514#issuecomment-169144547
Merged into master and 1.6 branch, could you create a JIRA to clean this
once the bugs are fixed in py4j (and released)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-169144753
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10580#discussion_r48901154
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2005,13 +2005,18 @@ setMethod("saveDF",
#' saveAsTable(df, "myfile")
#' }
setMethod("saveAsTable",
-
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#discussion_r48901213
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -498,7 +548,13 @@ private[execution] final class
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10580#discussion_r48901251
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ setGeneric("sampleBy", function(x, col, fractions,
seed) { standardGeneric("samp
#' @rdname
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#discussion_r48902027
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -661,29 +719,35 @@ private[execution] final class
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10514#issuecomment-169147628
> Merged into master and 1.6 branch, could you create a JIRA to clean this
once the bugs are fixed in py4j (and released)?
Created sub tasks in
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10514#issuecomment-169133324
LGTM, do we need to merge this into 1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10599#issuecomment-169133899
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#issuecomment-169133877
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10573#issuecomment-169136312
**[Test build #48775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48775/consoleFull)**
for PR 10573 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10573#issuecomment-169136491
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8960#issuecomment-169136389
@rahulpalamuttam Yes, please, it'd be great to update this PR to be a test
only (assuming it fails without the Breeze fix?). I'll test and comment on the
Breeze PR.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10573#issuecomment-169136495
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10594#issuecomment-169137240
LGTM pending tests
(There's an indentation bug in the table, but it's fine for now.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10573#issuecomment-169137225
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rahulpalamuttam commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8960#issuecomment-169139021
Actually the test passes regardless of whether the fix is there or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9267#issuecomment-169139805
@yanboliang No problem; thanks for your updates! This LGTM
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user robert3005 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10210#discussion_r48899006
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10514#issuecomment-169141854
> do we need to merge this into 1.6?
Yes since it affects all people using PySpark Streaming checkpoint.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9807#discussion_r48900277
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -396,7 +397,7 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressor(JavaEstimator,
HasFeaturesCol, HasLabelCol, HasPredi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10589#discussion_r48900041
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9807#discussion_r48900273
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ class DecisionTreeClassifier(JavaEstimator,
HasFeaturesCol, HasLabelCol, HasPred
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10158#issuecomment-169143652
LGTM I'll just run the tests once more before merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9535#issuecomment-169144391
@yu-iskw Apologies for the delay. We can get this merged now, once you can
update it. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10580#discussion_r48901574
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2005,13 +2005,18 @@ setMethod("saveDF",
#' saveAsTable(df, "myfile")
#' }
setMethod("saveAsTable",
-
Github user robbinspg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10599
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user robbinspg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10599#issuecomment-169148536
I closed this as per request but it states "Closed with unmerged commits"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-168991991
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10588#issuecomment-168992234
**[Test build #48758 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48758/consoleFull)**
for PR 10588 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10588#issuecomment-168992446
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10588#issuecomment-168992449
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10603#issuecomment-168992549
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48842483
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -240,6 +241,25 @@ private[hive] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48842647
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -189,13 +220,47 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10210#issuecomment-168995289
**[Test build #48760 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48760/consoleFull)**
for PR 10210 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#issuecomment-168995524
**[Test build #48770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48770/consoleFull)**
for PR 10498 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10210#issuecomment-168995484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10210#issuecomment-168995486
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-168996713
**[Test build #48759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48759/consoleFull)**
for PR 10554 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-168996918
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10595#issuecomment-168997214
**[Test build #48761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48761/consoleFull)**
for PR 10595 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10554#issuecomment-168996921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10595#issuecomment-168997399
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10595#issuecomment-168997402
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10603#discussion_r48844388
--- Diff: docs/streaming-custom-receivers.md ---
@@ -273,9 +273,9 @@ class CustomActor extends Actor with ActorHelper {
And a new input stream can be
Github user QiangCai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-168997795
@srowen I have rebased from master and resolved all conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#discussion_r48844423
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2028,6 +2028,7 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169181751
I've added a test using LogisitcRegression - I figured it would be better
to use a real model so as to validate that it got picked up OK on the Java side
too.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-169181495
**[Test build #48803 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48803/consoleFull)**
for PR 10585 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48916985
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -130,15 +133,22 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.1,
maxPatternLength=10, maxLocalProjDBSize=320
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48917047
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -68,11 +68,14 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.3, numPartitions=-1):
"""
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169182466
**[Test build #48802 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48802/consoleFull)**
for PR 10610 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10572#issuecomment-169183501
**[Test build #48804 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48804/consoleFull)**
for PR 10572 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48917244
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -130,15 +133,22 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.1,
maxPatternLength=10, maxLocalProjDBSize=320
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169183803
**[Test build #48805 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48805/consoleFull)**
for PR 9581 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169183941
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169183939
**[Test build #48805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48805/consoleFull)**
for PR 9581 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48917505
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -68,11 +68,14 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.3, numPartitions=-1):
"""
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169183944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user robert-dodier opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611
[SPARK-12663] [MLlib] More informative error message in
MLUtils.loadLibSVMFile
This PR contains 1 commit which resolves
[SPARK-12663](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12663).
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#issuecomment-16918
Thanks @somideshmukh! Could you please look the corrections from
@vijaykiran and me, extend the descriptions to the 100 character limit, and add
the parameter
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169185779
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#issuecomment-169186092
**[Test build #48806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48806/consoleFull)**
for PR 10605 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#issuecomment-169186628
Tests finally pass! (The last build failure was actually triggered by an
older commit.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169187125
**[Test build #48802 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48802/consoleFull)**
for PR 10610 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169187255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169187512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169187257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169187237
**[Test build #48793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48793/consoleFull)**
for PR 10606 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169187517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169189182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169189178
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#discussion_r48918992
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -221,3 +224,147 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#discussion_r48918891
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -221,3 +224,147 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190431
**[Test build #2332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2332/consoleFull)**
for PR 10611 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#discussion_r48919100
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -221,3 +224,147 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190664
**[Test build #2332 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2332/consoleFull)**
for PR 10611 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48919353
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParseUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9614#issuecomment-169191098
OK. I'll close this. Thanks for helping review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#discussion_r48919311
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/MLUtils.scala ---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ object MLUtils {
val indicesLength =
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190994
@robert-dodier thanks for your PR. Can you please fix the style issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user QiangCai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-169191091
I think I have resolved this problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
601 - 700 of 841 matches
Mail list logo
